Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:32:22.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“It is Typical of Teenagers”: When Teachers Morally Disengage from Cyberbullying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2022

Nádia Salgado Pereira Open the ORCID record for Nádia Salgado Pereira [Opens in a new window] ,
Paula Da Costa Ferreira Open the ORCID record for Paula Da Costa Ferreira [Opens in a new window] ,
Ana Margarida Veiga Simão Open the ORCID record for Ana Margarida Veiga Simão [Opens in a new window] ,
Andreia Cardoso ,
Alexandra Barros Open the ORCID record for Alexandra Barros [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexandra Marques-Pinto Open the ORCID record for Alexandra Marques-Pinto [Opens in a new window] ,
Aristides I. Ferreira Open the ORCID record for Aristides I. Ferreira [Opens in a new window] ,
Ana Cláudia Primor  and
Sara Carvalhal Open the ORCID record for Sara Carvalhal [Opens in a new window]
Nádia Salgado Pereira*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Paula Da Costa Ferreira
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Ana Margarida Veiga Simão
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Andreia Cardoso
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Alexandra Barros
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Alexandra Marques-Pinto
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Aristides I. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Portugal)
Ana Cláudia Primor
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
Sara Carvalhal
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Nádia Salgado Pereira. Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Psicologia and Centro de Investigação em Ciência Psicológica (CICPSI). Alameda da Universidade. 1649–013 Lisboa (Portugal). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Teachers can contribute to preventing and solving cyberbullying situations. Therefore, it is relevant to investigate what may influence their involvement and actions concerning this phenomenon. A first study analyze teachers’ definitions of cyberbullying, how they would intervene and feel morally implicated with the phenomenon. A second study aimed to investigate the association between teachers’ being aware of cyberbullying and their perceived severity, moral disengagement with the phenomenon, perceived performance to solve such situations and their acquired knowledge about cyberbullying. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted in the first study with 25 to 65-year-old teachers. An online inventory was answered in study two by 541 middle and high school teachers (Mage = 50, SD = 7). A thematic analysis from the first study revealed that most teachers did not report repetition of behavior, power imbalance, intentionality to harm, and occurrence among peers as defining features of cyberbullying. Also, strategies they would use to intervene mainly focused on reporting the incident. Moreover, moral disengagement mechanisms were found in teachers’ discourse, which contribute to displacing responsibility for intervening and perceiving cyberbullying as less severe. In the second study, path analysis revealed that teachers’ awareness of cyberbullying among their students was positively associated with moral disengagement and acquired knowledge of the phenomenon. The mediating role of acquired knowledge of cyberbullying was significant between being aware of cyberbullying and teachers’ perceived severity of the situation, moral disengagement, and perceived performance to solve these situations. These findings highlight the relevance of developing cyberbullying training actions involving teachers.

Keywords

cyberbullyingknowledge of cyberbullyingmoral disengagementteachersteachers’ training
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 25 , 2022 , e30
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de la Psicología de Madrid

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Funding Statement: This work received national funding from FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I. P. (grant number PTDC/PSI–GER/1918/2020), Centro de Investigação em Ciência Psicológica (CICPSI), Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa (grant numbers UIDB/04527/2020 and UIDP/04527/2020), and Business Research Unit (BRU), Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (grant number UID/GES/00315/2019).

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Data sharing: Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Author note: Nádia Salgado Pereira, Paula da Costa Ferreira, Ana Margarida Veiga Simão, Alexandra Barros and Alexandra Marques Pinto are at Centro de Investigação em Ciência Psicológica (CICPSI) and Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa.

References

Allison, K. R., & Bussey, K. (2016). Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses’ responses to cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 183–194. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2008). An agentic perspective on positive psychology. In Lopez, S. J. (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people. Vol. 1, Discovering human strengths (pp. 167–196). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bautista Alcaine, P., & Vicente Sánchez, E. (2020). How the education community perceives cyberbullying: A comparison of students, teachers and families. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Sage Publications, Ltd.Google Scholar
Campbell, M., Whiteford, C., & Hooijer, J. (2019). Teachers’ and parents’ understanding of traditional and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1507826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, L., Campbell, M. A., & Mergler, A. (2014). Teacher, parent and student perceptions of the motives of cyberbullies. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9254-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, K., Bell, D., & Leschied, A. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding school-based bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 34, 21–33.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeSmet, A., Aelterman, N., Bastiaensens, S., van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2015). Secondary school educators’ perceptions and practices in handling cyberbullying among adolescents: A cluster analysis. Computers & Education, 88, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, P., & Cefai, C. (2016). How to prevent and tackle bullying and school violence: Evidence and practices for strategies for inclusive and safe schools. NESET II Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/0799Google Scholar
Eden, S., Heiman, T., & Olenik‐Shemesh, D. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions, beliefs and concerns about cyberbullying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1036–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01363.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, P. C., Veiga Simão, A. M., Paiva, A., & Ferreira, A. (2019). Responsive bystander behaviour in cyberbullying: A path through self-efficacy. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(5), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1602671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finne, J., Roland, E., & Svartdal, F. (2018). Relational rehabilitation: Reducing harmful effects of bullying. Nordic Studies in Education, 38, 352–367. http://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-2018-04-05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, V. A., Johnston, M., Mattioni, L., Prior, T., Harcourt, S., & Lynch, T. (2016). Who is responsible for addressing cyberbullying? Perspectives from teachers and senior managers. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 5(2), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2016.1194240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.Google Scholar
Lo Cricchio, M. G., García-Poole, C., te Brinke, L., Bianchi, D., & Menesini, E. (2021). Moral disengagement and cyberbullying involvement: A systematic review. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 271–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1782186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, P. J., Betts, L. R., Stiller, J., & Kellezi, B. (2018). Perceptions and responses towards cyberbullying: A systematic review of teachers in the education system. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 43, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, P. J. R., Betts, L. R., Stiller, J., & Kellezi, B. (2019). “It’s so fluid, it’s developing all the time”: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions and understanding of cyberbullying in the school environment. Educational Studies, 46(5), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1620693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, P. J. R., Betts, L. R., Stiller, J., & Kellezi, B. (2021). ‘The more public it is, the more severe it is’: Teachers’ perceptions on the roles of publicity and severity in cyberbullying. Research Papers in Education, 36, 726–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marôco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações [Structural equation analyses: Theoretical foundations, software and applications]. ReportNumber.Google Scholar
Myers, C.-M., & Cowie, H. (2019). Cyberbullying across the lifespan of education: Issues and interventions from school to university. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, Article 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikolaou, D. (2022). Bullying, cyberbullying, and youth health behaviors. Kyklos, 75(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozansoy, K., Altınay, Z., & Altınay, F. (2018). Developing strategies to prevent “cyber-bullying”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1925–1929. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2015). Measuring cyberbullying: Implications for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., Grotpeter, J. K., Ingram, K., Michaelson, L., Spinney, E., Valido, A., Sheikh, A. E., Torgal, C., & Robinson, L. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Prevention Science, 23(3), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01259-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa, H., Pereira, N., Ribeiro, R., Ferreira, P. C., Carvalho, J. P., Oliveira, S., Coheur, L., Paulino, P., Veiga Simão, A. M., & Trancoso, I. (2019). Automatic cyberbullying detection: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, J. L., Mishna, F., Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2011). The missing voice: Parents’ perspectives of bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10), 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sourander, A., Brunstein Klomek, A., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., Ristkari, T., & Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(7), 720–728. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stauffer, S., Heath, M. A., Coyne, S. M., & Ferrin, S. (2012). High school teachers’ perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49(4), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. J., Connor, J. P., & Scott, J. G. (2015). Integrating traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Challenges of definition and measurement in adolescents – A review. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9261-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping”, “joining in”, and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meulen, K., Soriano, L., Granizo, L., del Barrio, C., Korn, S., & Schäfer, M. (2003). Recordando el maltrato entre iguales en la escuela: Consecuencias e influencia en la actuación del profesorado [Remembering school bullying: Consequences and influence on teachers’ performance]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 26(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1174/02103700360536428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga Simão, A. M., Ferreira, P. C., Freire, I., Caetano, A. P., Martins, M. J., & Vieira, C. (2017). Adolescent cybervictimization: Who they turn to and their perceived school climate. Journal of Adolescence, 58, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.04.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veiga Simão, A. M., Ferreira, P., Francisco, S. M., Paulino, P., & de Souza, S. B. (2018). Cyberbullying: Shaping the use of verbal aggression through normative moral beliefs and self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 14, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818784870Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pereira et al. supplementary material

Pereira et al. supplementary material

Download Pereira et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.9 KB