Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:17:30.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incremental Validity of Personality Measures in Predicting Underwater Performance and Adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

Joaquín Colodro*
Affiliation:
Delegación de Defensa en la Región de Murcia (Spain)
Enrique J. Garcés-de-los-Fayos
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
Juan J. López-García
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)
Lucía Colodro-Conde
Affiliation:
Universidad de Murcia (Spain)

Abstract

Intelligence and personality traits are currently considered effective predictors of human behavior and job performance. However, there are few studies about their relevance in the underwater environment. Data from a sample of military personnel performing scuba diving courses were analyzed with regression techniques, testing the contribution of individual differences and ascertaining the incremental validity of the personality in an environment with extreme psychophysical demands. The results confirmed the incremental validity of personality traits (ΔR 2 = .20, f2 = .25) over the predictive contribution of general mental ability (ΔR 2 = .07, f2 = .08) in divers’ performance. Moreover, personality ( $R_L^2$ = .34) also showed a higher validity to predict underwater adaptation than general mental ability ( $R_L^2$ = .09). The ROC curve indicated 86% of the maximum possible discrimination power for the prediction of underwater adaptation, AUC = .86, p < .001, 95% CI (.82–.90). These findings confirm the shift and reversal of incremental validity of dispositional traits in the underwater environment and the relevance of personality traits as predictors of an effective response to the changing circumstances of military scuba diving. They also may improve the understanding of the behavioral effects and psychophysiological complications of diving and can also provide guidance for psychological intervention and prevention of risk in this extreme environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anegg, U., Dietmaier, G., Maier, A., Tomaselli, F., Gabor, S., Kallus, K. W., & Smolle-Juttner, F. M. (2002). Stress-induced hormonal and mood responses in scuba divers: A field study. Life Sciences, 70, 27212734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(02)01537-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, A. J., & Egstrom, G. H. (1987). Stress and performance in diving. San Pedro, CA: Best Publishing.Google Scholar
Bachrach, A. J., Ginzburg, H., Joiner, J., Miller, J. W., Parks, R., & Stewart, J. (1976). Psychological factors involved in undersea-hyperbaric exposures: Selection and training of professional divers. In Beckett, M. W. (Ed.), National Plan for the Safety and Health of Divers in their quest for subsea energy (pp. 5.15.43). Bethesda, MD: Undersea Medical Society.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Godden, D. R., Moray, N. P., Ross, H. E., & Synodinos, N. E. (1978). Final report on training services agency contract - Selection of diving trainees. Cambridge, UK: Stirling University and Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1804_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00160 Google Scholar
Beckman, T. J., Lall, R., & Johnson, W. B. (1996). Salient personality characteristics among Navy divers. Military Medicine, 161, 717719.Google Scholar
Bennett, P. B., & Elliott, D. H. (Eds.) (1993). The physiology and medicine of diving (4 th Ed.). London, UK: Saunders.Google Scholar
Berghage, T. E. (1972). The use of Standard Navy Classification Test scores for the selection of diver first class candidates. NEDU Res. Rep. 2072. Panama City, FL: U.S. Navy Experimental Diving Unit.Google Scholar
Biersner, R. J. (1984). Physical and psychological examination of diver: Psychological standards for diving. In Shilling, C. W., Carlston, C. B., & Mathias, R. A. (Eds.), The physician’s guide to diving medicine (pp. 520530). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Biersner, R. J., & Larocco, J. M. (1987). Personality and demographic variables related to individual responsiveness to diving stress. Undersea Biomedical Research, 14, 6773.Google Scholar
Brubakk, A. O., & Neuman, T. S. (Eds.) (2003). Bennett and Elliott’s physiology and medicine of diving (5 th Ed.). London, UK: Saunders.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In Schmitt, N. & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 3570). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., & Zook, L. M. (1991). Improving the selection, classification, and utilization of Army enlisted personnel: Final report on Project A. Res. Rep. ARI-1597. Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castillo, M. D. (2010, February). Estrés, ansiedad y rendimiento cognitivo. Una síntesis de seis teorías [Stress, anxiety and cognitive performance. A synthesis of six theories]. Paper presented at the 11th Virtual Congress of Psychiatry. Interpsiquis 2010. Retrieved from http://www.psiquiatria.com/bibliopsiquis/bitstream/10401/1193/1/8cof345431.pdf Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1998). 16 PF, Cuestionario Factorial de Personalidad (adolescentes y adultos) [16PF, Personality Factor Questionnaire (adolescents and adults)]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Colodro, J., Garcés de los Fayos, E., & Velandrino, A. (2012). Diferencias de personalidad en la aptitud psicológica para el buceo militar [Personality differences in the psychological fitness for military diving]. Anales de Psicología, 28, 434443. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.28.2.148971 Google Scholar
Colom, R., & Andrés-Pueyo, A. (1999). El estudio de la inteligencia humana: Recapitulación ante el cambio de milenio [The study of human intelligence. A revision at the turn of the century]. Psicothema, 11, 453476.Google Scholar
Cordero, A, Seisdedos, N. González, M., & de la Cruz, M. V. (1994). TIG-2: Test de Inteligencia General (serie dominós - Forma 2) [TIG-2: General Intelligence Test (series dominoes - Form 2)]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2006). Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: A third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10, 251267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). The psychology of personnel selection. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, C. W. (1972). The diver. RANSUM Project 2/72. Balmoral, UK: Royal Australian Navy School of Underwater Medicine (RANSUM).Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (2008). Personality and intelligence at work: Exploring and explaining individual differences at work. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Where and why g matters: Not a mystery. Human Performance, 15, 2546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2002.9668082 Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2004). Intelligence: Is it the epidemiologists’ elusive «fundamental cause» of social class inequalities in health? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 174199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174 Google Scholar
Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100 Google Scholar
Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2007). Personality and career success. In Gunz, H. P. & Peiperl, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of career studies (pp. 5978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976107.n4 Google Scholar
Moray, N. P., Ross, H. E., & Synodinos, N. E. (1979). Final report on a tests battery for the selection of trainee divers. Stirling, UK: Stirling University.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. P., Raglin, J. S., & O’Connor, P. J. (2004). Trait anxiety predicts panic behavior in beginning scuba students. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 25, 314322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-815829 Google ScholarPubMed
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 10291049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00100.x Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, O., & Dilchert, S. (2005). Cognitive ability in selection decisions. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 431468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 Google Scholar
Pelechano, V. (1975). El cuestionario MAE (Motivación y Ansiedad de Ejecución) [The questionnaire MAE (Motivation and achievement anxiety)]. Madrid, Spain: Fraser Española.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1992). Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 8689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768746 Google Scholar
Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x Google Scholar
Rostain, J. C., & Balon, N. (2006). Recent neurochemical basis of inert gas narcosis and pressure effects. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, 33, 197204.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 3043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30 Google Scholar
Salgado, J. F. (1998). Big Five personality dimensions and job performance in Army and civil occupations: A European perspective. Human Performance, 11, 271288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.1998.9668034 Google Scholar
Salgado, J. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 323346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647201 Google Scholar
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J. P. (2003). A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 10681081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1068 Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SPSS. (2010). IBM SPSS Regression 19. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
Stankov, L., Boyle, G. J., & Cattell, R. B. (1995). Models and paradigms in personality and intelligence research. In Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 1543). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wijk, C. (2002). Comparing personality traits of Navy divers, Navy non-divers and civilian sport divers. Journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society, 32, 28.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, C., & Waters, A. H. (2001). Personality characteristics of South African Navy divers. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, 28, 2530.Google Scholar