Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:45:18.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impulsivity, Intelligence, and Discriminating Reinforcement Contingencies in a Fixed-Ratio 3 Schedule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

José Héctor Lozano Bleda  and
Miguel Ángel Pérez Nieto
José Héctor Lozano Bleda*
Affiliation:
Universidad Camilo José Cela (Spain)
Miguel Ángel Pérez Nieto
Affiliation:
Universidad Camilo José Cela (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to José Héctor Lozano Bleda. Dpto. de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Camilo José Cela. C/ Castillo de Alarcón, 49. Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research conducted in academic contexts suggests a moderating effect of impulsive behavior on the relationship between aptitude and achievement. According to these studies, intelligence scores being equal, higher levels of impulsivity have an adverse effect on achievement (Helmers, Young, & Pihl, 1995; Vigil-Colet & Morales-Vives, 2005; Zeidner, 1995). The present study aims to contrast the aforementioned moderator effect in the context of a discriminant learning task, carried out under a fixed-ratio 3 reinforcement schedule. To that end, an impulsive behavioral pattern was identified in a sample of 1,600 participants' task execution based on response rate and latency. Said pattern was consistent and stable across several trials and can be ascribed to subjects' interactive style (Hernández, 2000). The observed interaction effect supports the hypothesis that impulsivity has a moderating effect on the aptitude-achievement relationship, highlighting how it impacts achievement differentially depending on the subject's level of aptitude.

Estudios relativos a contextos académicos sugieren un efecto moderador del comportamiento impulsivo sobre la relación entre aptitud y rendimiento. De acuerdo con estos trabajos, a igualdad de valores de inteligencia, una mayor impulsividad iría en perjuicio del aprendizaje (Helmers, Young, & Pihl, 1995; Vigil-Colet & Morales-Vives, 2005; Zeidner, 1995). El presente trabajo tiene por objeto contrastar dicho efecto moderador en el contexto de una tarea de aprendizaje discriminativo bajo un programa de reforzamiento razón fija 3. A tal fin, se ha identificado un patrón de comportamiento impulsivo en la ejecución de una muestra de 1,600 participantes con base en indicadores comportamentales de tasa y latencia de respuesta. El patrón de comportamiento identificado permite ser atribuido al estilo interactivo de los individuos, mostrando consistencia y estabilidad a lo largo de diferentes ensayos (Hernández, 2000). El efecto de interacción observado viene a respaldar la hipótesis de un efecto moderador de la impulsividad en la relación aptitud-rendimiento, poniendo a su vez de manifiesto cómo la impulsividad afecta al rendimiento de manera diferencial, en virtud del nivel aptitudinal que presentan los individuos.

Keywords

impulsivityintelligencelearningdiscriminationimpulsividadinteligenciaaprendizajediscriminación
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 922 - 929
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Vernon, P. A., & Lang, K. L. (2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 198–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizot, J. C., & Thiébot, M. H. (1996). Impulsivity as a confounding factor in certain animal tests of cognitive function. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 243–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(96)00010-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolster, B., Marshall, W., Bow, J., & Chalmers, N. (1986). Visual selective attention and impulsivity in learning-disabled children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2, 25–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565648609540325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. T., & Wynne, M. A. (1984). Attentional characteristics and teachers ratings in hyperactive, reading disabled, and normal boys. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 13, 38–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374418409533167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. New York, NY: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.58.1.95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilger, J., Eliason, M., & Richman, C. (1989). A comparison of cognitive and behavioral patterns in learning-disabled children: Subtype and sex differences. Developmental Neuropsychology, 5, 227–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565648909540434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, M., & Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.84.4.537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmers, K. F., Young, S. N., & Pihl, R. O. (1995). Assessment of measures of impulsivity in healthy male volunteers. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 927–935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(95)00107-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, J. M. (2000). La personalidad: Elementos para su estudio [Personality: Elements of its study]. Madrid, Spain: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.91.2.153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1996). Social skills deficits in learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 226–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lozano, J. H., Hernández, J. M., Rubio, V., & Santacreu, J. (2011). Fluid intelligence and discriminative operant learning of reinforcement contingencies in a fixed ratio 3 schedule. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 585–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynam, D., Moffitt, T., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1993). Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure or self-control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 187–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.102.2.187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J., Flory, K., Lynam, D., & Leukefeld, C. (2003). A test of the four-factor model of impulsivity-related traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1403–1418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00122-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, F. G., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., & Schmitz, J. M. (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1783–1793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagle, R. J., & Thwaite, B. C. (1979). Modeling effects on impulsivity with learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 331–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221947901200509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, L. H., & Rabbit, P. M. A. (1995). Impulsivity and speedaccuracy strategies in intelligence test performance. Intelligence, 21, 13–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(95)90036-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Routh, D. K. (1979). Activity, attention, and aggression in learning disabled children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 8, 183–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374417909532916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio, V., & Santacreu, J. (2003). TRAS-I: Test adaptativo informatizado para la evaluación del razonamiento secuencial y la inducción [Adaptive, computerized test to assess sequential reasoning and induction]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Santacreu, J. (2004). Flag test to assess discriminant learning and persistence. (Technical report). Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Santacreu, J. (2007). SIDEP, a Computer Based Assessment System (CBA). (Technical report). Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Santacreu, J., Hernández, J. M., Adarraga, P., & Márquez, M. O. (2002). La personalidad en el marco de una teoría del comportamiento humano [Personality within the framework of a theory of human behavior]. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Pirámide.Google Scholar
Santacreu, J., Rubio, V., & Hernández, J. (2004). Evaluación objetiva de la personalidad: Una alternativa a los cuestionarios [Objective personality assessment: An alternative to questionnaires]. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 30, 803–825.Google Scholar
Schweizer, K. (2002). Does impulsivity influence performance in reasoning? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1031–1043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00209-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigg, J. M., & Gargiulo, R. M. (1980). Creativity and cognitive style in learning disabled and nondisabled school age children. Psychological Reports, 46, 299–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1980.46.1.299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarver, S. G., & Hallahan, D. P. (1974). Attention deficits in children with learning disabilities: A review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7 560–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221947400700906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A., & Morales-Vives, F. (2005). How impulsivity is related to intelligence and academic achievement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeidner, M. (1995). Personality trait correlates of intelligence. In Saklofske, D. H. and Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar