Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:04:46.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

General Factor of Personality Questionnaire (GFPQ): Only one Factor to Understand Personality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Salvador Amigó ,
Antonio Caselles  and
Joan C. Micó
Salvador Amigó*
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
Antonio Caselles
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
Joan C. Micó
Affiliation:
Universitat Politècnica de Valéncia (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Salvador Amigó. Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos. Universidad de Valencia. Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21. 46010 Valencia. (Spain). Phone: +34-963864476. Fax: +34-963864669. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study proposes a psychometric approach to assess the General Factor of Personality (GFP) to explain the whole personality. This approach defends the existence of one basic factor that represents the overall personality. The General Factor of Personality Questionnaire (GFPQ) is presented to measure the basic, combined trait of the complete personality. The questionnaire includes 20 items and is constituted by two scales with 10 items each one: the Extraversion Scale (ES) and the Introversion Scale (IS). The GFPQ shows adequate internal consistency and construct validity, while the relationships with the personality factors of other models and with psychopathology are as expected. It correlates positively and significantly with Extraversion (E) and Psychoticism (P), and negatively with Neuroticism (N) of Eysenck's EPQ (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire); it correlates positively and significantly with the Sensation Seeking Scaled (SSS) of Zuckerman, and is inside the expected direction with Sensitivity to Reward (SR) and Sensitivity to Punishment (SP) of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ), which represent the approach and avoidance trends of behavior, respectively. It not only relates negatively with the personality disorders of the anxiety spectrum, but also with the emotional disorders in relation to anxiety and depression, and it relates positively with the antisocial personality disorder.

El presente estudio propone una aproximación psicométrica a la evaluación del Factor General de Personalidad (FGP) para explicar la personalidad completa. Esta aproximación defiende la existencia de un factor básico que representa la personalidad general. El Cuestionario del Factor General de Personalidad (CFGP) se presenta como herramienta para medir este rasgo básico combinado de la personalidad global. El cuestionario incluye 20 ítems y está constituido por dos escalas con 10 ítems cada una: la Escala de Extraversión (EE) y la Escala de Introversión (EI). El CFGP muestra una consistencia interna adecuada y validez de constructo, mientras que sus relaciones con los factores de personalidad de otros modelos y con la psicopatología son las que se esperan. Correlaciona positiva y significativamente con Extraversión (E) y con Psicoticismo (P) y negativamente con Neuroticismo (N) del Cuestionario de Personalidad de Eysenck (CPE); correlaciona positiva y significativamente con la Escala de Búsqueda de Sensaciones (EBS) de Zuckerman y se encuentra en la dirección esperada en su relación con Sensibilización al Refuerzo (SR) y Sensibilización al Castigo (SC) del Cuestionario de Sensibilización al Castigo y Sensibilización al Refuerzo (CSCSR), los cuales representan respectivamente las tendencias conductuales de aproximación y evitación. No solo se relaciona negativamente con los trastornos de personalidad del espectro de ansiedad sino también con los trastornos emocionales que tienen relación con la ansiedad y la depresión y, se relaciona positivamente con el trastorno antisocial de la personalidad.

Keywords

general factor of personalityunique traitpersonality traitsassessmentintroversionextraversionFactor general de personalidadrasgo únicorasgos de personalidadevaluaciónintroversiónextraversión
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 5 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amigó, S. (2005). La teoría del rasgo único de personalidad. Hacia una teoría unificada del cerebro y la conducta (The unique-trait personality theory. Towards a unified theory of brain and behavior). Editorial de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
Amigó, S., Caselles, A., & Micó, J. C. (2008). A dynamic extraversion model. The brain's response to a single dose of a stimulant drug. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 211–231.Google Scholar
Ball, S., & Zuckerman, M. (1990). Sensation seeking. Eysenck's personality dimensions and reinforcement sensibility in concept formation. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, R., Renwick, S. J. D., Donnely, J. P., & Logan, C. (2004). Big Five or Big Two? Superordinate factor in the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 957–970.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R., Logan, C., & Renwick, S. J. D. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of personality disorder: Hierarchical structure and relationships with the five-factor model, the interpersonal circle, and psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 597–623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogaert, A. F., & Rusthon, J. P. (1989). Sexuality, delinquency and r/K reproductive strategies: Data from Canadian university sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1071–1077.Google Scholar
Brim, O. G., Baltes, P. B., Bumpass, L. L., Cleary, P. D., Featherman, D. L., Hazzard, W. L. et al. National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS), 1995-1996 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. DataStat and Harvard Medical School, Dept of Health Care Policy [producers], 1996. ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
Buckingham, R. M., Charles, M. A., & Beh, H. (2001). Extraversion and neuroticism, partially independent dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S, Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, Emotion, and Personality: Emerging Conceptual Integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impeding reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselles, A., Micó, J. C., & Amigó, S. (in press). Cocaine Addiction and Personality: A Mathematical Model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.Google Scholar
Caseras, X., Ávila, C., & Torrubia, R. (2003). The measurement of individual differences in Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Systems: a comparison of personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 999–1013.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odesa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2001). J.A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derogatis, L. (1994). SCL-90-R. Symptom Checklist-90-R. Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis: National Computer System.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2001). Higher-order factors of the big five predict conformity: Are the neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-Avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdle, S., Irwing, P., Rushton, J. P., & Park, J. (2010). The general factor of personality and its relation to self-esteem in 628,640 Internet respondents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48. [Published on-line].Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? –Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1992 a). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1992 b). A reply to Costa and McCrae. P or A and C –the role of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 867–868.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1985). Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-R) and Short Scale (EPQ-RS). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., & Rushton, J. P. (2009). Evidence for shared genetic dominante between the general factor of personality, mental and physical health, and life history traits. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 555–563.Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R. et al. , (2006). Consilience and Life History Theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 2, 243–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. R. (2007). The K-Factor, Covitality, and Personality. A Psychometric Test of Life History Theory. Human Nature, 18, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowles, D. C. (1987). Application of a behavioral theory of motivation to the concepts of anxiety and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 417–435.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (1987) The neuropsychology of emotion and personality. In Stahl, S.M., Iverson, S. & Goodman, E. (eds.), Cognitive Neurochemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 171–190.Google Scholar
Harary, K., & Donahue, E. (1994). Who do you think you are? San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
Heubeck, B. G., Wilkinson, R. B., & Cologon, J. (1998). A second look at Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 785–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. J., & Smille, L. D. (2004). Appetitive motivation predicts the majory of personality and an ability measure: A comparison of BAS measures and a reevaluation of the importance of RST. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1627–1636.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Henderson, A. S., Jacomb, P. A., Korten, A. E., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation: Factor structure and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassebaum, G. C., Couch, A. S., & Slater, P. E. (1959). The factorial dimensions of the MMPI. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 23, 226–236.Google Scholar
Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Personality Psychology: domains of knowledge about nature. McGraw-Hill. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Liebert, R. M., & Liebert, L. L. (1999). Personality. Strategies and Issues. Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
López-Ibor, J. J., Pérez, A., & Rubio, V. (1996). IPDE. International Personality Disorder Examination. Meditor. Madrid.Google Scholar
Loranger, A. W., Sartorius, N., Andreoli, A., Berger, P., Buchheim, P., Channabasavanna, S. M. et al. (1994). The International Personality Disorder Examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lykken, D.T. (1982, September). Fearlessness. Psychology Today, 23–26.Google Scholar
MacAndrew, C., & Steele, T. (1991). Gray's behavioral inhibition system: a psychometric evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.Google Scholar
Musek, J. (2006). Higher-order factors of personality. Unpublished manuscript. University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M. I., Moro, M., & Silva, F. (1997). Cuestionario revisado de Personalidad de Eysenck. Versiones completa (EPQ-R) y abreviada (EPQ-RS). Adaptación al español. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.Google Scholar
Pérez, J., & Torrubia, R. (1986). Fiabilidad y validez de la versión española de la escala de búsqueda de sensaciones (forma V)(Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the sensation seeking scale). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 18, 7–22.Google Scholar
Quilty, L. C., & Oakman, J. M. (2004). The assessment of behavioral activation –the relationship between impulsivity and behavioral activation. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J. P. (1985). Differential K theory: The socio-biology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J. P. (1990). Sir Francis Galton, epigenetic rules, genetic similarity theory, and human life history analysis. Journal of Personality, 58, 117–140.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., & Hur, Y-M. (2008). The genetics and evolution of the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173–1185.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., Ando, J., Hur, Y-M., Irwing, P., Vernon, P. A. et al. (2009). A general factor of personality from mulitrait-multimethod data and cross-national twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 356–365.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2008). A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrik, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679–683.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009a). A general factor of personality in the Comrey Personality Scales, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, and the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 437–442.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009b). A general factor of personality in 16 sets of the Big Five, the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey, the California Psychological Inventory, and the Temperament and Character Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 558–564.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2009c). A general factor of personality (GFP) from the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 571–576.Google Scholar
Rushton, J.P.& Irwing, P. (2009d). A General Factor of Personality in the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III, the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology, and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1091–1095.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Vernon, P. A., & Bons, T. A. (2007). No evidence that polymorphisms of brain regulator genes Microcephalin and ASPM are associated with general mental ability, head circumference, or altruism. Biology Letters, 3, 157–160.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2003). The structure of personality attributes. In Barrick, M.R. & Ryan, A.M. (Eds.), Personality and work (pp. 1–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). The correlation between general intelligence (g), a general factor of personality (GFP), and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 187–189.Google Scholar
Smits, D. J. M., & Boeck, P. D. (2006). From BIS/BAS to the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 20, 255–270.Google Scholar
SPSS Inc. (2007). SPSS 16.0. Base User's Guide. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Torrubia, R., Ávila, C., Moltó, J., & Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and Impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862.Google Scholar
Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Petrides, K. V., Cherkas, L. F., Spence, T. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2009a). A general factor of personality: Evidence from the HEXACO Model and a measure of trait emotional intelligence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 420–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Petrides, K. V., & Vernon, P. A. (2009b). Evidence for a heritable general factor of personality in two studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 254–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (1999). Susceptibility to affect: A comparison of three personality taxonomies. Journal of Personality, 67, 761–791.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139–149.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Khulman, D. M., & Camac, C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analysis of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Khulman, D. M., Thornquist, M., & Kiers, H. (1991). Five (or three) robust questionnaire scale factors of personality without culture. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 929–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar