Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:26:32.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factor Structure of Items from the Personality Adjective Check List in a Sample of Normal Adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Josep M. Tous ,
Núria Pont  and
Ruben Muiños
Josep M. Tous*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona
Núria Pont
Affiliation:
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Ruben Muiños
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Josep Maria Tous. Departament de Personalitat, Avaluació i Tractaments Psicològics, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Barcelona. Ps. Vall d'Hebron, 171, 08035 Barcelona (Spain). Telephone: (34) 93 312 51 08. Fax: (34) 93 402 13 62. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present the results of a principal-components analysis of the Personality Adjective Check List (PACL) at the item level, rather than at the scale level. The PACL was constructed by Strack (1987) to evaluate the personality scales proposed by Millon (1981). Data were obtained from a sample of normal adolescents. A scree test was applied to determine the number of factors to be extracted, and the retained factors were then rotated using a varimax procedure. Using the data from this second analysis, congruence coefficients were calculated by correlating the factor weights from the two analyses of men and women. Results reveal the existence in the whole sample of five unipolar personality factors, which we have called: Aggressive, Conscientious, Inhibited, Impulsive and Gregarious. These are not similar to those obtained from a sample of normal adults.

Se presentan los resultados de un análisis de componentes principales del Personality Adjective Check List (PACL) al nivel de los ítems en vez del nivel de escala. El PACL fue construido por Strack (1987) para evaluar las escalas de personalidad propuestas por Millon (1981). Los datos se obtuvieron de una muestra de adolescentes normales. Se aplicó una prueba scree para determinar el número de factores a extraer, y los factores retenidos se rotaron con el procedimiento varimax. Empleando los datos de este segundo análisis, se calcularon los coeficientes de congruencia al correlacionar los pesos factoriales de los dos análisis de varones y mujeres. Los resultados revelan la existencia en toda la muestra de cinco factores unipolares de personalidad, que hemos denominado: Agresivo, Concienzudo, Inhibido, Impulsivo y Gregario. No se parecen a los factores obtenidos de una muestra de adultos normales.

Keywords

abnormal personality typesadolescentspersonality adjective check listprincipal components analysis at the items levelpersonality disorderstipos de personalidad anormaladolescenteslistado de adjetivos de personalidadcomponentes principalesanálisis al nivel de ítemstrastornos de personalidad
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , November 2006 , pp. 228 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, A., García, O., & García, L.F. (2003). Replicability of the three, four and five Zuckerman's personality super-factors: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the EPQ-RS, ZKPQ and NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1093–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree for the number of factors. Multivariable Behavior Research, 1, 245–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R.B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life science. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chico, E., Tous, J.M., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2003). Spanish adaptation of Dickman's impulsivity inventory: Its relationship to Eysenck's personality questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1883–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Clerq, B., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). Personality disorder symptoms in adolescents: A five factor model perspective. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, M.W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Millon, T. (1981). Disorders of personality: DSM-III, Axis II. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Millon, T. (1983). Modern psychopathology. Prospect Height, IL: Wavelan Press.Google Scholar
Millon, T. (1987). Manual for the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Millon, T. (1996). Disorders of personality. DSM-IV and beyond. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Millon, T., Green, C. J., & Meagher, R.B. (1982). Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory manual. Minneapolis MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Muiños, R. (2003). Significación de los indicadores del PMK-RD a partir de diferentes pruebas verbales de personalidad. Unpublished Advanced License research (DEA). Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Pont, N. (1998) Adaptación y baremación de un listado de adjetivos para la evaluación de la personalidad adolescente. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Strack, S. (1987). Manual for the Personality Adjective Check List (PACL). Draft Psychology Service, 116b. Veterans' Administration Outpatients Clinic.Google Scholar
Strack, S., & Lorr, M. (1990). Item factor structure of the Personality Adjective Check List (PACL). Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar