Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:42:32.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dyadic Coping, Dyadic Coping Based Gratitude (DC-G), and Relationship Satisfaction in Pakistani Couples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2022

Sultan Shujja Open the ORCID record for Sultan Shujja [Opens in a new window] ,
Guy Bodenmann Open the ORCID record for Guy Bodenmann [Opens in a new window] ,
Ashley K. Randall Open the ORCID record for Ashley K. Randall [Opens in a new window] ,
Adnan Adil Open the ORCID record for Adnan Adil [Opens in a new window]  and
Farah Malik Open the ORCID record for Farah Malik [Opens in a new window]
Sultan Shujja
Affiliation:
University of Sargodha (Pakistan)
Guy Bodenmann
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich (Switzerland)
Ashley K. Randall
Affiliation:
Arizona State University (USA)
Adnan Adil*
Affiliation:
University of Sargodha (Pakistan)
Farah Malik
Affiliation:
University of Punjab (Pakistan)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Adnan Adil. University of Sargodha. Department of Psychology. 40100 Sargodha, Punjab (Pakistan). E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dyadic coping-based gratitude (DC-G) refers to the reaction of appreciation and thankfulness in response to received problem-focused and emotion-focused positive dyadic coping (DC) behaviors by the partner. The actor-partner interdependent mediation model was used to test the mediating role of DC-G between DC and relationship satisfaction in a purposive sample of 300 Pakistani married couples, which were treated as indistinguishable following the use of a test for distinguishability. Mediation analysis demonstrated that DC-G partially mediated the couples’ DC and relationship satisfaction implying that the association between DC and relationship satisfaction strengthened as the DC-G intervenes in the path model. Additionally, the actor-actor or partner-partner indirect effects were stronger compared to the cross-partner effect suggesting that husbands or wives’ DC more strongly predicted corresponding relationship satisfaction via DC-G compared to husbands-wives’ DC. Implications are discussed within collectivistic cultural orientation and Islamic religious obligations regarding marital relationships in Pakistani couples.

Keywords

cultural orientationDC-based gratitude couples’ interdependencePakistanreligious obligations
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 25 , 2022 , e31
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de la Psicología de Madrid

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Funding Statement: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Data Sharing: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Al-Ghazzali, I. (1999). The beginning of guidance. (Ramzan, M., Trans.). Hanfia Pak Publications.Google Scholar
Al-Ghazzali, A. H. M., & Daniel, E. D. (Ed.). (2015). The alchemy of happiness (Field, C., Trans.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L., & Maisel, N. C. (2010). It’s the little things: Everyday gratitude as a booster shot for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01273.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8(3), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Algoe, S. B., Kurtz, L. E., & Hilaire, N. M. (2016). Putting the “you” in “thank you” examining other-praising behavior as the active relational ingredient in expressed gratitude. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616651681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algoe, S. B., & Stanton, A. L. (2012). Gratitude when it is needed most: Social functions of gratitude in women with metastatic breast cancer. Emotion, 12(1), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Algoe, S. B., & Zhaoyang, R. (2016). Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1117131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, S. A., Ahmed, M., Bhatti, O. K., & Farooq, W. (2020). Gratitude and its conceptualization: An Islamic perspective. Journal of Religion and Health, 59, 1740–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00850-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arshad, Z., & Iqbal, N. (2016). Dyadic coping in Pakistani couples. In Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 203–217). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie,/Revue Suisse de Psychologie 54(1), 34–49.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping-a systematic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 47, 137–140.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11031-002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenmann, G., & Shantinath, S. D. (2004). The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53, 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00056.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, G., Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2004). Gratitude in practice and the practice of gratitude. In Linley, P. A. & Joseph, S. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 464–481). http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939338.ch29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds: I. Aetiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(3), 201–210. http://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.130.3.201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, R. A., & Shelton, C. M. (2002). Gratitude and the science of positive psychology. In Snyder, C. R. & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 459–471). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, J., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconier, M. K., & Kuhn, R. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., and Bodenmann, G. (2016). Cultural considerations in understanding dyadic coping across cultures. In Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 23–35). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, B. C., & van Vleet, M. (2010). Growing through attachment: The interplay of attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In Emmons, R. A. & McCullough, M. C. (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 144– 166). http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195150100.003.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2012). To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028723CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermaen, H., & Bhutto, Z. H. (2020). Gratitude and forgiveness as predictors of subjective well-being among young adults in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 35, 725–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., Alghraibeh, A. M., Aryeetey, R., Bertoni, A., Bettache, K., Błazejewska, M., Bodenmann, G., Borders, J., Bortolini, T. S., Butovskaya, M., Castro, F. N., Cetinkaya, H., Cunha, D., David, O. A., … Yoo, G. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iida, M., Seidman, G., & Shrout, P. E. (2018). Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517725407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, N., & Safdar, H. (2014). Emotional stability, intimacy, and dyadic coping and its relationship with marital satisfaction among love and arranged married couples. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
Kanter, J. B., & Schramm, D. G. (2018). Brief interventions for couples: An integrative review. Family Relations, 67(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, K., & Revenson, T. A. (2016). Including the cultural context in dyadic coping: Directions for future research and practice. In Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 285–299). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, B. C. H. (2011). Culture’s consequences on coping theories, evidences, and dimensionalities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 1084–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1985). Stress and coping. Springer.Google ScholarPubMed
Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Rudaz, M., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00595.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Does gratitude promote prosocial behavior? The moderating role of attachment security. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 267–283). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nepomuceno, R. W., Gonçalves, A. d. S., & Hernandez, J. A. E. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Dyadic Coping Inventory: Systematic review. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 16(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.7597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasha-Zaidi, N., & Al-Seheel, A., & Bridges-Lyman, K., & Dasti, R. (2021). Gratitude and wellbeing: Cultivating Islamically-integrated pathways to health and wellness. In Pasha-Zaidi, N. (Ed.), Cross-cultural advancements in positive psychology (Vol. 15; pp. 207–234). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72606-5_10Google Scholar
Qadir, F., de Silva, P., Prince, M., & Khan, M. (2005). Marital satisfaction in Pakistan: A pilot investigation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990500113260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qadir, F., Khan, M. M., Medhin, G., & Prince, M. (2011). Male gender preference, female gender disadvantage as risk factors for psychological morbidity in Pakistani women of childbearing age-a life course perspective. BMC Public Health, 11(1), Article 745. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramzan, N., & Rana, S. A. (2014). Expression of gratitude and subjective well-being among university teachers. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 21, 756–762.Google Scholar
Røysamb, E., Vittersø, J., & Tambs, K. (2014). The Relationship Satisfaction Scale - Psychometric properties. Norsk Epidemiologi, 24, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusu, P. P., Nussbeck, F. W., Leuchtmann, L., & Bodenmann, G. (2020). Stress, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction: A longitudinal study disentangling timely stable from yearly fluctuations. PLOS ONE, 15(4), Article e0231133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabourin, S., Laporte, L., & Wright, J. (1990). Problem solving self‐appraisal and coping efforts in distressed and nondistressed couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(1), 89–97. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1990.tb00048.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah-Kazemi, R. (2014). The wisdom of gratitude in Islam. In Walsh, R. (Ed.). The world’s great wisdom: Timeless teachings from religions and philosophies (pp. 55–85). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Shujja, S., Adil, A., Randall, A. K., Bodenmann, G., & Malik, F. (2020). Psychometric properties and validity of Dyadic Coping Inventory-Urdu Version for use in Pakistan. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 14(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v14i2.4069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shujja, S., Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., Adil, A., & Malik, F. (2022). Development and validation of the Dyadic Coping Based Gratitude Questionnaire (DC-GQ). Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32(2), 128–155.Google Scholar
Tsang, J. A. (2007). Gratitude for small and large favors: A behavioral test. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701229019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmann, M., Sprang, S., & van den Brink, F. (2019). Adult attachment and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of gratitude toward the partner. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11-12), 3875–3886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519841712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, N., DeHaan, C. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Attributing autonomous versus introjected motivation to helpers and the recipient experience: Effects on gratitude, attitudes, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 34(4), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9183-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Brown, G. D., & Maltby, J. (2011). Thanks, but I’m used to better: A relative rank model of gratitude. Emotion, 11(1), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., & Maltby, J. (2008). Gratitude uniquely predicts satisfaction with life: Incremental validity above the domains and facets of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Stewart, N., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008). A social-cognitive model of trait and state levels of gratitude. Emotion, 8(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahra, S. (2019). Dyadic coping, gratitude-based dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction among couples: An intergenerational perspective [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Institute of Southern Punjab, Multan, Pakistan.Google Scholar