Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:03:17.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Energy Expenditure Affect the Perception of Egocentric Distance? A Failure to Replicate Experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Jeffrey J. Hutchison  and
Jack M. Loomis
Jeffrey J. Hutchison*
Affiliation:
University of California
Jack M. Loomis
Affiliation:
University of California
*
Correspondence concerning this arcitle should be addressed to Jeffrey J. Hutchison, Department of Cognitive & Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02192 (USA).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a series of recent studies, Proffitt and his colleagues have reported that the perceived distance to a target is influenced by the energy expenditure associated with any action, such as walking or throwing, for spanning the distance to the target. In particular, Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003) reported that wearing a heavy backpack caused verbal reports of distance to increase. We conducted a study to determine whether three responses dependent on perceived distance (verbal report of distance, blind walking, and estimates of object size) are influenced by the backpack manipulation. In two experiments, one involving a between-participants design and the other involving a within-participants design, we found that none of the three responses were influenced by the wearing of a heavy backpack.

En una serie reciente de trabajos, Proffitt y sus colegas informaron de que la distancia a la que se percibe una estimulación diana se ve afectada por el gasto de energía asociado a la realización de cualquier acción, como andar o lanzar un objeto, que pueda realizarse para cubrir la distancia hasta la estimulación diana. Concretamente, Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton y Epstein (2003) afirmaron que llevar una mochila pesada hizo que se incrementasen los informes verbales sobre la distancia. Realizamos un estudio para verificar si tres respuestas que dependen de la distancia percibida (informe verbal de distancia, andar a ciegas y estimaciones del tamaño de un objeto) son afectadas por el uso de la mochila. En dos experimentos, uno con un diseño inter-participantes y el otro con un diseño intra-participantes, encontramos que ninguna de las tres respuestas era afectada por llevar una mochila pesada.

Keywords

distance perceptionenergy expenditurepercepción de la distanciagasto de energía
Type
Monographic Section: Spatial Vision and Visual Space
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , November 2006 , pp. 332 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, D.R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in perceiving geographical slants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 1076–1096.Google Scholar
Creem-Regehr, S.H., Gooch, A.A., Sahm, C.S., & Thompson, W.B. (2004). Perceiving virtual geographic slant: Action influences perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 811–821.Google ScholarPubMed
Creem-Regehr, S.H., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A.A., & Thompson, W.B. (2005). The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual indoor environments. Perception, 34, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foley, J.M., Ribeiro, N.P., & Da Silva, J.A. (2004). Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space. Vision Research, 44, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukusima, S.S., Da Silva, J.A., & Loomis, J.M. (1997). Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 86–100Google ScholarPubMed
Gilinsky, A.S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gogel, W.C., Loomis, J.M., Newman, N.J., & Sharkey, T.J. (1985). Agreement between indirect measures of perceived distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchison, J.J. (2005). The effect of physiological potential on egocentric distance and size perception. Honors undergraduate thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Califorinia.Google Scholar
Kelly, J.W., Loomis, J.M., & Beall, A.C. (2004). Judgments of exocentric distance in large-scale space. Perception, 33, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, J.M., & Loomis, J.M. (2004). Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence, 13, 572–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Philbeck, J.W., & Golledge, R.G. (1998). Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 966–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loomis, J.M. & Knapp, J.M. (2003). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Hettinger, L.J. & Haas, M.W. (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments (pp. 21–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ooi, T.L., Wu, B., & He, Z J. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ooi, T.L., Wu, B., & He, Z.J. (in press). Perceptual space in the dark affected by the intrinsic bias of the visual system. Perception.Google Scholar
Philbeck, J.W., Loomis, J.M., & Beall, A.C. (1997). Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Perception and Psychophycsics, 59, 601–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proffitt, D.R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 409–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proffitt, D.R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., & Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in distance perception. Psychological Science, 14, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, H.A. (1986). Space perception. In Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L., & Thomas, J.P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 21.1–21.57). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A.A., Creem-Regehr, S.H., Loomis, J.M., & Beall, A.C. (2004). Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence, 13, 560–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, J.K., Proffitt, D.R., & Epstein, W. (2004). Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception, 33, 577–590CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, B., Ooi, T.L., & He, Z.J. (2004). Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information. Nature, 428, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed