Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:53:34.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences and Similarities among Volunteers who Drop out During the first Year and Volunteers who Continue after eight Years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

María Luisa Vecina Jiménez ,
Fernando Chacón Fuertes  and
Manuel J. Sueiro Abad
María Luisa Vecina Jiménez*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Fernando Chacón Fuertes
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Manuel J. Sueiro Abad
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to María Luisa Vecina Jiménez. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Complutense. Campus de Somosaguas. 28223 Madrid. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differences and similarities between 130 volunteers who remain for more than eight years in the same non-profit organization and 110 volunteers who quit during the first year were analyzed in this paper. Both groups were chosen from a sample of 851 volunteers that were working as volunteers when we assessed the independent variables (Time 1). After a 12-month follow-up (Time 2), 209 (25%) of them had dropped out and 642 (75%) continued in the same organization. Using the previous time, we formed two groups made up of those who dropped out and had been in the organization less than a year and those who continued and had been in the organization more than 8 years. Results show that differences and similarities between both groups are coherent with the three-stage model of volunteer's duration (Chacón, Vecina, & Dávila, 2007). This model includes the functional approach of volunteers' motivations (Clary & Snyder, 1991), and the role identity approach (Callero, 1985), and indicates that people will remain as volunteers insofar as this satisfies the motivations that are relevant for them at the first stage, they develop organizational commitment at the second stage, and they develop role identity as volunteers at the third stage. More specifically, results show that it is possible to predict 85% of the cases correctly using seven variables. Volunteers who remain after eight years feel a higher level of emotional exhaustion, a higher level of organizational commitment, and a strong role identity as volunteers. They are also highly satisfied with the friendships in the organization and have a stronger intention to remain at the long term (2 years).

En este trabajo se analizan las diferencias y semejanzas entre dos grupos extremos de voluntarios, uno compuesto por 110 voluntarios que abandonan antes del primer año y otro compuesto por 130 voluntarios que continúan después de ocho. Estos dos grupos fueron seleccionados de una muestra total de 851 voluntarios, que, en el momento en el que se tomaron las medidas de las variables independientes (T1), estaban en activo y que, doce meses más tarde, cuando se midió la variable dependiente tiempo de permanencia (T2), resultó que habían abandonado 209 (25%) y que continuaban con su trabajo voluntarios en la misma organización 642 (75%). Puesto que en todos los casos se midió en el momento inicial (T1) el tiempo previo, se aplicaron dos criterios de selección para configurar los grupos, uno relativo al tiempo previo (menor a un año o mayor de 8 años) y otro relativo a la permanencia (abandona o sigue). Los resultados muestran una pauta de diferencias y semejanzas coherente con los supuestos del Modelo de las tres etapas de la permanencia del voluntariado (Chacón, Vecina y Dávila, 2007), que integra las dos principales líneas de investigación sobre la permanencia del voluntariado, la teoría funcional de las motivaciones (Clary y Snyder, 1991) y la basada en la identidad de rol (Callero, 1985), y que establece como variables explicativas fundamentales en la primera etapa la satisfacción, en la segunda el compromiso con la organización y en la tercera la identidad de rol. Más concretamente los resultados muestran que a través de siete variables es posible predecir correctamente la pertenencia a uno de los dos grupos en un 85% de los casos. Los voluntarios permanentes presentan niveles mayores de cansancio emocional, de compromiso organizacional y de identidad de rol como voluntarios. También parecen estar más satisfechos con las relaciones de amistad en la organización y tienen mayor intención de permanecer a largo plazo (dos años).

Keywords

volunteerismemotional exhaustionorganizational commitmentvolunteer role identitysatisfactionvoluntariadopermanenciamotivacionescansancio emocionalsatisfacciónidentidad de rolcompromiso organizacional
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 343 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Jul, J. & Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action-control: From cognitions to behaviors (pp. 11–39). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Arias, A., & Barrón, A. (2008). El apoyo social en la predicción a corto y medio plazo de la permanencia del voluntariado socioasistencial. Psicothema, 20, 97–103.Google Scholar
Brickman, P. (1987). Commitment, Conflict, and Caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capner, M., & Caltabiano, M. L. (1993). Factors affecting the progression towards burnout. A comparison of professional and volunteer counseling. Psychological-Reports, 73, 555–561.Google ScholarPubMed
Chacón, F., Vecina, M. L., Barrón, A., & De Paúl, P. (1999). Burnout en voluntarios que trabajan con pacientes de SIDA o cáncer. Clínica y Salud, 10, 137–150.Google Scholar
Chacón, F., Vecina, M. L., & Dávila, M. C. (2007). The three-stage model of volunteer's duration of service. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clary, E., & Orenstein, L. (1991). The amount and effectiveness of help: The relationship of motives and abilities to helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clary, E., & Snyder, M. (1991). A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior: The case of volunteerism. In Clark, M. S. (Ed.), Prosocial behavior. Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 119–148). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clary, E., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J. et al. , (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claxton, R. P. R., Catalán, J., & Burgess, A. P. (1998). Psychological distress and burnout among buddies: Demographic, situational and motivational factors. AIDS-Care, 10, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortes, L., Hernán, M. J., & López, O. (1998). Las organizaciones de voluntariado en España. Madrid: Plataforma para la Promoción del Voluntariado en España.Google Scholar
Dávila, M. C. (2003). La incidencia diferencial de los factores psicosociales en distintos tipos de voluntariado. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Dávila, M. C., & Chacón, F. (2003). Adaptación de instrumentos para la evaluación de aspectos organizacionales en ONGs. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 19, 159–179.Google Scholar
Dávila, M. C., & Chacón, F. (2007). Prediction of longevity of volunteer service: A basic alternative proposal. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 115–121.Google Scholar
Davila, M. C., Chacón, F., & Vecina, M. L. (2005). El modelo de la identidad de rol de voluntario: análisis de sus componentes básicos en una muestra de voluntarios. Revista de Psicología General Aplicada, 58, 333–346.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., Hall, J. A., & Meyer, M. (2003). The first year: Influences on the satisfaction, involvement, and persistence of new community volunteers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FEAPS. (2004). El voluntariado en el movimiento asociativo FEAPS, retrieved from http://www.feaps.org/voluntarios/documentos/voluntariado_interesa.pdfGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, M. A., Penner, L. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2005). Motive, role identity, and prosocial personality as predictors of volunteer activity. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introductions to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Florin, P. K., Jones, E., & Wandersman, A. (1986). Black participation in voluntary associations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 15, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenslade, J. H., & White, K. M. (2005). The prediction of above-average participation in volunteerism: A test of the theory of planned behavior and the Volunteers' Functions Inventory in older Australian adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grube, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1108–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Jamison, I. B. (2003). Turnover and retention among volunteers in human service agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23, 114–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafer, B. (1991). The attrition of hospice volunteers. Omega Journal of Death and Dying, 23, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemon, M., Paisleys, B. J., & Jacobson, P. E. (1972). Dominant status and involvement in formal voluntary associations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1, 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2007). Young people and volunteerism: A model of sustained volunteerism during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Adult Development 15, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maslanka, H. (1996). Burnout, social support and AIDS volunteers. AIDS Care, 8, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medina, M. E. (2000). Perfil del voluntario. Murcia, Spain: Plataforma para la Promoción del Voluntariado en la región de Murcia.Google Scholar
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W.& Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, W. H., Ross, M. W., Sunderland, R. H., & Shelp, E. E. (1996). Prediction of grief and HIV/AIDS related burnout in volunteers. AIDS Care, 8, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okun, M. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1992). Motives and intent to continue organizational volunteering among residents of a retirement community area. Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 183–187.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 671–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penner, L. A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piliavin, J. A., Grube, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (2002). Role as resource for action in public service. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (1991). Giving blood: The development of an altruistic identity. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez, V.& López, J.P. (2003). El tercer sector social en España, Madrid: MTAS.Google Scholar
Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T.& Boulian, P.V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. W., Greenfield, S. A., & Bennett, L. (1999). Predictors of dropout and burnout in AIDS volunteers: A longitudinal study. AIDS Care, 11, 723–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. H. (1983). Synanthrometrics: On progress in the development of a general theory of voluntary action and citizen participation. In Smith, D. H., Til, J. V. & otros (Eds.), International perspectives on voluntary action research. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., Clary, E. G., & Stukas, A. A. (2000). The functional approach to volunteerism. In Maio, G. R. & Olson, J. M. (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 365–393). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., Omoto, A. M., & Crain, A. L. (1999). Punished for their good deeds: Stigmatization of AIDS volunteers. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1175–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecina, M. L. (2001). Factores psicosociales que influyen en la permanencia del voluntariado. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Vecina, M. L., Astray, A. A., Dávila, M. C., Barrón, A., Chacón, F., & De Paúl, P. (2001). Influencia del burnout en el abandono de los voluntarios. Intervención Psicosocial, 10, 157–168.Google Scholar
Vecina, M. L., & Chacón, F. (1999). Estudio sobre las motivaciones de una muestra de voluntarios españoles en el campo del SIDA. Estudios de Psicología, 62, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecina, M. L., & Chacón, F. (2005). Positive emotions in volunteerism. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 30–35.Google Scholar
Vecina, M. L., Chacón, F., & Sueiro, M. J. (2009). Satisfacción en el voluntariado: estructura interna y relación con la permanencia en las organizaciones. Psicothema, 21(1), 112–117Google Scholar
Wandersman, A., Florin, P. K., Friedmann, R. R., & Meier, R. (1987). Who participates, who does not participate, and why? Participation in block and neighborhood organizations in the United States and Israel. Sociological Forum, 2, 534–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winniford, J., Carpenter, D., Stanley, , & Grider, C. (1995). An analysis of the traits and motivations of college students involved in service organizations. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 27–38.Google Scholar