Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:58:20.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composite and Preferences Scales of Morningness: Reliability and Factor Invariance in Adult and University Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Juan Francisco Díaz Morales  and
María Pilar Sánchez-López
Juan Francisco Díaz Morales*
Affiliation:
Complutense University of Madrid
María Pilar Sánchez-López
Affiliation:
Complutense University of Madrid
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Juan Francisco Díaz Morales, Departamento de Psicología Diferencial y Psicología del Trabajo, Facultad de Psicología.Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Campus de Somosaguas. 28223 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The creation and adaptation of scales or inventories assessing specific circadian typologies has been a predominant focus within the field of chronopsychology. The present study addressed the psychometric properties of two scales of morningness-eveningness: the Morningness Composite Scale (CS; Smith, Reilly, & Midkiff, 1989) and the Early/Late Preferences Scale (PS; Smith, Folkard, Schmieder, Parra, Spelten, & Almirall, 1993). Internal consistency and factor invariance of the CS and PS were analyzed in two samples: a group of 203 university students (age range = 19-30) and a group of 125 working adults (age range = 31-65). Results indicated satisfactory internal consistency for both full scales with each age group and confirmed the factor invariance across age for the two CS factors and one of the PS factors. A higher tendency in morningness on both scales was noted in the adult sample.

Uno de los campos de estudio más desarrollado por la cronopsicología ha sido la creación y adaptación de escalas o inventarios para evaluar la tipología circadiana. En este estudio se presentan las propiedades psicométricas de dos escalas de evaluación de la matutinidad-vespertinidad: la Escala Compuesta de Matutinidad (CS; Smith, Reilly y Midkiff, 1989) y la Escala de Preferencias (PS; Smith, Folkard, Schmieder, Parra, Spelten y Almirall, 1993). Para cada escala, se analizó tanto la consistencia interna como la invarianza factorial en dos muestras: un grupo de 203 universitarios (edad entre 19 y 30 años) y un grupo de trabajadores adultos (edad entre 31-65 años). Los resultados indican una consistencia interna adecuada para cada una de las escalas en ambos grupos, así como una estructura factorial invariante en función de la edad para los dos factores de la CS y uno de los factores de la PS. Aparece una mayor tendencia a la matutinidad en el grupo adulto.

Keywords

morningness-eveningnessundergraduatesadultsreliabilityfactor invarianceage differencesmatutinidad-vespertinidaduniversitariosadultosfiabilidadinvarianza factorialdiferencias de edad
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , November 2004 , pp. 93 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adan, A., & Almirall, H. (1991). Horne and Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire: A reduced scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alzani, V., & Natale, A. (1998). Uno strumento per la valutazione delle differeze ne ritmi circadiani: una versione italiana della Composite Scale of Morningness. Testing Psicometría Metodología, 5, 19–31.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariance and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohle, P. (1989). The impact of night work on psychological well-being. Ergonomics, 32, 1089–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohle, P., Tilley, A.J., & Brown, S. (2001). Psychometric evaluation of the Early/Late Preferences Scale. Ergonomics, 44, 887–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, F.M. (1993). Psychometric equivalence of an improved Basic Language Morningness (BALM) Scale using industrial population within comparisons. Ergonomics, 36(13), 191–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, B., Shavelson, R., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caci, H., Nadalet, L., Staccini, P., Myquel, M., & Boyer, P. (1999). Psychometric properties of the French version of the Composite Scale of Morningness in adults. European Psychiatry, 14, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrier, J., & Monk, T. (2000). Circadian rhythms of performance: New trends. Chronobiology International, 17, 719–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz Ramiro, E. (2000). Estudio de los aspectos psicológicos determinantes de la adaptación al trabajo nocturno. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Complutense University of Madrid.Google Scholar
Díaz Morales, J.F., & Sánchez-López, M.P. (in press). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Compuesta de Matutinidad y la Escala de Preferencias. Psicothema.Google Scholar
Folkard, S., & Monk, T.H. (Eds). (1985). Hours of work: Temporal factors in work scheduling. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Folkard, S., Monk, T.H., & Lobban, M.C. (1979). Toward a predictive test of adjustment to shiftwork. Ergonomics, 22, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furham, A., & Hughes, K. (1999). Individual difference of nightwork and shift-work rotation. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 941–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, K.N. (1994). Long-term stability and psychometric properties of the Composite Scale of Morningness. Ergonomics, 37, 377–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guthrie, J.P., Ash, R.A., & Bendapudi, V. (1995). Additional validity evidence for a measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härmä, M. (1993). Individual differences in tolerance to shiftwork: A review. Ergonomics, 36, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, J.A., & Östberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Ishihara, K., Saitoh, T., Inoue, Y., & Miyata, K. (1984). Validity of the Japanese version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skill, 59, 863–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K.G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Kerkhof, G. (1985). Inter-individual differences in the human circadian system: A review. Biological Psychology, 20, 83–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koscec, A., Radosevic-Vidacek, B., & Kostovic, M. (2001). Morningness-eveningness across two student generations: Would two decades make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 627–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luijben, T. (1989). Statistical guidance for model modification in covariance structure analysis. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (1988). Morningness-eveningness as a dimension of personality: Trait, state and psychopshysiological correlates. European Journal of Personality, 2, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mecacci, L., & Rochetti, G. (1998). Morning and evening types: Stress-related personality aspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moog, R. (1981). Morning-evening types and shiftwork. A questionnaire study. In Reinberg, A., Vieux, N. & Andlauer, P. (Eds.). Night and shiftwork: Biological and social aspects (pp. 481–488). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Natale, A. & Alzani, V. (2001). Additional validity evidence for the Composite Scale of Morningness. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natale, V., & Cicogna, P. (1996). Circadian regulation of subjective alertness in morning and evening “types.” Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 491–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pornpitakpan, C. (1998). Psychometric properties of the Composite Scale of Morningness: A shortened version. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pornpitakpan, C. (2000). Additional validity of the Basic Language Morningness (BALM) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R., & Kyllonen, P. (1999). Morningness-eveningness and intelligence: Early to bed, early to rise will likely make you anything but wise! Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1123–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. D., & Irvine, S. (1999). Development and construct validation of the Lark-Owl (Chronotype) Indicator (LOCI): Technical Report. Manuscript in Preparation.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Folkard, S., Schmieder, R., Parra, L., Spelten, E., Almirall, H., Sen, R., Sahu, S., Pérez, L., & Tisak, J. (2002). Investigation of morning-evening orientations in six countries using the Preferences Scale. Personality an Individual Differences, 32, 949–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C., Folkard, S., Schmieder, R., Parra, L., Spelten, E., & Almirall, H. (October, 1993). The Preferences Scale: Multinational assessment of a new measure of morningness. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Reilly, C., & Midkiff, K. (1989). Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 728–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C., Tisak, J., Bauman, T., & Green, E. (1991). Psychometric equivalence of a translated circadian rhythm questionnaire: Implications for between- and within-population assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 628–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.S., Guilleminault, C., & Efron, B. (1997). Circadian rhythms and enhanced athletic performance in the national football league. Sleep, 20, 362–365.Google ScholarPubMed
SPSS, Inc. (1988). SPSS-X user's guide. New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Tankova, I., Adan, A., & Buela-Casal, G. (1994). Circadian typology and individual differences. A review. Personality an Individual Differences, 16, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testu, F. (1989). Chronopsychologie et rythmes scolaires. París: Masson.Google Scholar
Torsvall, L., & Åkerstdt, T. (1980). A diurnal type scale. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 6, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, W. (1982). Biological rhythms, sleep, and performance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zickar, M., Russell, S., Smith, C., Bohle, P., & Tilley, A. (2002). Evaluating two morningness scales with item response theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar