Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:39:50.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Classification of Spanish Adolescents Based on Substance Consumption Patterns and the Analysis of the Relationships within their Social Developmental Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Pilar Ramos ,
Carmen Moreno ,
Francisco Rivera  and
Ana López
Pilar Ramos*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
Carmen Moreno
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
Francisco Rivera
Affiliation:
Universidad de Huelva (Spain)
Ana López
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Pilar Ramos. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Facultad de Psicología. C/ Camilo José Cela s/n. 41018 Sevilla (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research is part of the 2006 edition of the Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. The data presented were composed of a sample of 15942 Spanish adolescents ranging from 13 to 18 years of age. The instruments used included a variety of questions related to substance consumption among adolescents, their bio-psycho-social adjustment and developmental contexts, all of which are part of the HBSC study instrument bank. Through classification analysis, as well as significance and effect size tests, we obtained relevant information about the current epidemiology of substance consumption among Spanish adolescents. These results are representative of the Spanish adolescent population which allows the typical risk profile attributed to young people to be clarified. A gradual adjustment can be seen in terms of substance consumption levels in youth and that same level in their friends. Likewise, the analysis of the developmental context (family, friends and school) provides important information when it comes to preventing substance consumption, thus showing the advantages that coherence and connection have between the different environments where youth live, grow up and develop.

Esta investigación forma parte de la edición 2006 del estudio Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC). Los datos que se presentan constituyen una muestra de 15942 adolescentes españoles de 13 a 18 años. Los instrumentos utilizados han sido diversas preguntas relacionadas con el consumo de sustancias, el ajuste biopsicosocial de los adolescentes y sus contextos de desarrollo, que forman parte del banco de instrumentos del estudio HBSC. Realizando análisis de clasificación, pruebas de significación y tamaños de efecto, se obtiene información relevante acerca de la epidemiología actual del consumo de sustancias en los adolescentes españoles. Se trata de resultados representativos de la población española que permiten matizar con detalle el perfil de riesgo típicamente atribuido a los jóvenes. Se demuestra una graduación en la relación entre el nivel de consumo de sustancias de los jóvenes y el nivel de consumo de sus amistades. Así mismo, el análisis de los contextos de desarrollo (familia, amistades y escuela) aporta información relevante a la hora de prevenir el consumo de sustancias, demostrando las ventajas que supone la coherencia y conexión entre los diferentes ámbitos donde los jóvenes viven, crecen y se desarrollan.

Keywords

substance consumptionadolescencehealthdevelopmental contextsSpainconsumo de sustanciasadolescenciasaludcontextos de desarrolloEspaña
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , November 2011 , pp. 734 - 745
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdi, H. (2007). Kendall rank correlation. In Salkind, N. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 508–510). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berns, R. M. (2009). Child, family, school, community: Socialization and support (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Brook, J. S., Cohen, P., Whiteman, M., & Gordon, A. S. (1992). Psychosocial risk factors in the transition from moderate to heavy use or abuse of drugs. In Glantz, M. D. & Pickens, R. (Eds.), Vulnerability to drug abuse. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cantril, G. (1965). The pattern of human concern. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curran, P. J., Stice, E., & Chassin, L. (1997). The relation between adolescent alcohol use and peer alcohol use: A longitudinal random coefficients model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, C., Roberts, C., Morgan, A., Smith, R., Settertobulte, W., Samdal, O., & Rasmussen, B. (2008). Inequalities in young people's health: International report from the HBSC 2005/06 survey. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Chassin, L., Hussong, A., Barrera, M., Molina, B., Trim, R., & Ritter, J. (2004). Adolescent substance use. In Lerner, R. M., & Steinberg, L. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 665–696). New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedobbeleer, N., & Desjardins, S. (2001). Outcomes of an ecological and participatory approach to prevent alcohol and other drug “abuse” among multiethnic adolescents. Substance Use & Misuse, 36, 1959–1991. doi:10.1081/JA-100108434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00354.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, T. E., Tildesley, E., Duncan, S. C., & Hops, H. (1995). The consistency of family and peer influences on the development of substance use in adolescence. Addiction, 90, 1647–1660. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.901216477.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosebruch, G., Sánchez, M., Delva, J., Wagner, F., & Anthony, J. C. (2003). Family attention and tobacco smoking among adolescents in Central America, Panama, and the Dominican Republic. Substance Use & Misuse, 38, 1037–1062. doi:10.1081/JA-120017650CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, J., Collins, L. M., Hill, K. G., & Hawkins, J. D. (2000). Developmental pathways to alcohol abuse and dependence in young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 61, 799–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, J., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2002). A developmental analysis of sociodemographic, family, and peer effects on adolescent illicit drug initiation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 838–845. doi:10.1097/00004583-200207000-00017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence. New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Hibell, B., Guttormsson, U., Ahlström, S., Balakireva, O., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., & Kraus, L. (2009). The 2007 ESPAD Report. Substance use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm, Sweden: The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs.Google Scholar
Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use. Science, 190, 912–914. doi:10.1126/science.1188374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, C., Sanchez-Queija, I., Muñoz-Tinoco, V., Gaspar, M., Dallago, L., Ter Bogt, T., … Rivera, F. (2009). Cross-national associations between parent and peer communication and psychological complaints. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios (2009). Se vende alcohol a menores [Alcohol is sold to minors]. OCU- Salud, 83, 20–23.Google Scholar
Paulson, M., Combs, R., & Richardson, M. (1990). School performance, educational aspirations, and drug use among children and adolescents. Journal of Drug Education, 20, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plan Nacional sobre Drogas (2009). Informe de la Encuesta Estatal sobre Uso de Drogas en Estudiantes de Enseñanzas Secundarias – ESTUDES 2008 [State survey on drug use among students in secondary schools – ESTUDES, 2008]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social.Google Scholar
Ramos, P., Moreno, C., Rivera, F., & Pérez, P. J. (2010). Integrated analysis of the health and social inequalities of Spanish adolescents. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 477–498.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Dwyer, K. M., Kim, A. H., & Burgess, K. B. (2004). Attachment, friendship, and psychosocial functioning in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 326–356. doi:10.1177/0272431604268530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schkad, A., & Kahnema, D. (1998). Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life. Satisfaction Psychological Science, 9, 340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons-Morton, B. G., Farhat, T., ter Bogt, T. F. M., Hublet, A., Kuntsche, E., Gabhainn, S. N., … the HBSC Risk Behaviour Focus Group (2009). Gender specific trends in alcohol use: Cross-cultural comparisons from 1998 to 2006 in 24 countries and regions. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson International Edition.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1948). WHO Constitution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar