Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:19:34.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chilean Version of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) Scale: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2021

Ana María Fernández Open the ORCID record for Ana María Fernández [Opens in a new window] ,
Carmen Gloria Baeza ,
Paula Pavez Open the ORCID record for Paula Pavez [Opens in a new window]  and
Nerea Aldunate
Ana María Fernández
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (Chile)
Carmen Gloria Baeza
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (Chile)
Paula Pavez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Playa Ancha (Chile)
Nerea Aldunate
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (Chile)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated the psychometric properties of the empathy quotient (EQ) scale translated to Spanish in Chile. We estimated its structural validity, and its construct validity with other convergent measures of empathy and attachment, as well an inversely associated construct such as aggression. We used a general sample of students and community individuals (n = 336). Participants completed the EQ, Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), and Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Another exclusively community group (n = 102) completed Collins Adult Attachment scale and the EQ. CFA and ESEM analyses confirmed the structural model fit of the data to three previously reported dimensions of the EQ: cognitive empathy (CE), emotional reactivity (ER) and social skills (SS). Sex-differences in emotional reactivity, and the predicted relationships with the convergent measures were observed. The current Chilean version of the EQ resulted in an appropriate multidimensional measurement of empathy. Finally, providing a specific social skills dimension extends the traditional conception of cognitive and affective empathy to the social realm in the Chilean context.

Keywords

confirmatory factor analysis/structural equational modelingconstruct validationempathy assessmentindividual differences
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 24 , 2021 , e24
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to the participants of our study for their valuable contribution to research. We also wish to thank the Psychologists Sebastián Hernández, Yvone Acevedo and Camila Alvarez for their help with data collection.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Funding Statement: This work was supported by University of Santiago (CGB & AMF Project USA 1799 – VRIDEI 031993FT-PAP), and the Government of Chile (AMF, Grant Fondecyt Regular# 1181114, PP Grant Fondecyt Initiation # 11190245, NA Grant Fondecyt Postdoctoral #3170801).

References

Angulo, B., Estévez, A., Iriarte, L., & Troyas, I. (2019). Empatía y mindfulness como factores mentalizadores intervinientes en las relaciones entre el apego y la sensibilidad interpersonal en mujeres [Empathy and mindfulness as intervening mentalizing factors in the relationships between attachment and interpersonal sensitivity in women]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 25(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2019.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assis Gomes, C. M., Almeida, L. S., & Núñez, J. C. (2017). Rationale and applicability of exploratory structural equation modeling (esem) in psychoeducational contexts. Psichothema, 29(3), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.369Google ScholarPubMed
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high‐functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient (EQ): An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, S., Farrington, D. P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2005). Explaining gender differences in crime and violence: The importance of social cognitive skills. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(3), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2004.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besel, L. D. S., & Yuille, C. J. (2010). Individual differences in empathy: The role of facial expression recognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. (2018). Traits of empathy and anger: Implications for psychopathy and other disorders associated with aggression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170155. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1: Attachment (2nd Ed.). Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brown, M. M., Thibodeau, R. B., Pierucci, J. M., & Gilpin, A. T. (2017). Supporting the development of empathy: The role of theory of mind and fantasy orientation. Social Development, 26(4), 951–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810–832. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.4.810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J. (2005). Perspective taking as the royal avenue to empathy. In Malle, B. F. & Hodges, S. D. (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (p. 143–157). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Deuse, L., Wudarczyk, O., Rademacher, L., Kaleta, P., Karges, W., Kacheva, S., Gründer, G., & Lammertz, S. E. (2019). Peripheral oxytocin predicts higher-level social cognition in men regardless of empathy quotient. Pharmacopsychiatry, 52(3), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0590-4850Google ScholarPubMed
Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., & Milojević, S. (2011). Psychological characteristics of future helping professionals: Empathy and attachment of psychology students. Psihologija, 44(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.2298/psi1102097dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiStefano, C., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, D. (2018). Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: Evidence for trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling, 25(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryburgh, N. S. J., & Vachon, D. D. (2019). Relating sex differences in aggression to three forms of empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, Article 109526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2013). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. The British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández, A. M., & Dufey, M. (2015). Adaptation of Collins’ dimensional adult attachment scale revised to the Chilean context. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica, 28(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, A. M., Dufey, M., & Kramp, U. (2011). Testing the psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in Chile. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantiva, C., Cendales, R., Díaz, M., & González, Y. (2018). Is there really a relationship between empathy and aggression? Evidence from physiological and self-report measures. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518776999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, L. E., Barrada, J. R., Aguasvivas, J. A., Martínez-Molina, A., Arias, V. B., Golino, H. F., Legaz, E., Ferrís, G., & Rojo-Moreno, L. (2020). Is small still beautiful for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire? Novel findings using exploratory structural equation modeling. Assessment, 27(6), 1349–1367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118780461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., Gouveia, R. S. V., Neto, J. R., & Galvão, L. (2012). Brazilian-Portuguese Empathy Quotient: Evidences of its construct validity and reliability. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38889CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilera, T., Batalla, I., Forné, C., & Soler-González, J. (2019). Empathy and big five personality model in medical students and its relationship to gender and specialty preference: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1485-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R. (2018). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambleton, R. K., & de Jong, J. H. A. L. (2003). Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests. Language Testing, 20(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt247xxCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshanloo, M. (2018). Evaluating the factor structure of the midi personality scale using exploratory structural equation modeling. Japanese Psychological Research, 60(3), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidron, R., Kaganovskiy, L., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Empathizing-systemizing cognitive styles: Effects of sex and academic degree. PLOS ONE, 13(3), Article e0194515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194515CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911–920. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C.-H. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Romero, L., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Romero, E. (2014). Assessing callous-unemotional traits in a Spanish sample of institutionalized youths: The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37(3), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9469-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchers, M. C., Li, M., Haas, B. W., Reuter, M., Bischoff, L., & Montag, C. (2016). Similar personality patterns are associated with empathy in four different countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, C. B., Allison, C., Lai, M.-C., Cassidy, S., Langdon, P. E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2016). Do adults with high functioning autism or Asperger syndrome differ in empathy and emotion recognition? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 1931–1940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2698-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muncer, S. J., & Ling, J. (2006). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noten, M. M. P. G., van der Heijden, K. B., Huijbregts, S. C. J., van Goozen, S. H. M., & Swaab, H. (2019). Indicators of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and social attention during emotional clips in relation to aggression in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 185, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolo Senese, V., De Nicola, A., Passaro, A., & Ruggiero, G. (2018). The factorial structure of a 15-item version of the Italian Empathy Quotient Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(5), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual-Sagastizabal, E., Sánchez-Martín, J. R., Vegas, O., Muñoz, J. M., Braza, P., Carreras, M. R., del Puerto-Golzarri, N., & Azurmendi, A. (2019). Aggressive behavior in school-aged children: Clusters based on anger, empathy and testosterone and cortisol measures. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22, E42. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, O. C., & Anestis, J. C. (2020). The indirect relationships between psychopathic traits and proactive and reactive aggression through empathy and emotion dysregulation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 42(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09760-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redondo, I., & Herrero-Fernández, D. (2018). Adaptación del Empathy Quotient (EQ) en una muestra española [Adaptation of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) in a Spanish sample]. Terapia Psicológica, 36(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082018000200081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saracco-Álvarez, R. A., Fresán, A., Rodríguez-Pérez, V., Robles-García, R., Escamilla Orozco, R. I., Díaz-Martínez, L. R., Tovilla-Zárate, C.-A., & Olivares-Neumann, J. L. (2020). Development of the Mexican version of the Empathy Quotient. Salud Mental, 43(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2020.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanger, N., Kavussanu, M., McIntyre, D., & Ring, C. (2016). Empathy inhibits aggression in competition: The role of provocation, emotion, and gender. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, J. A., Borelli, J. L., & Smiley, P. A. (2014). Assessing parental empathy: A role for empathy in child attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2014.969749CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, J. A., & Cassidy, J. (2018). Empathy from infancy to adolescence: An attachment perspective on the development of individual differences. Developmental Review, 47, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. L., & Gullone, E. (2008). Prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescents: An investigation into associations with attachment and empathy. Anthrozoös, 21(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303708x305774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, I. N., Foster, J. D., & Webster, G. D. (2019). The Dark Triad’s inverse relations with cognitive and emotional empathy: High-powered tests with multiple measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdivia-Peralta, M., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., González-Bravo, L., & Lemos-Giráldez, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of the AQ Aggression Scale in Chilean students. Psicothema, 26(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.84Google ScholarPubMed
Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., R., Smith, & Weil, L. (2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, A., & Kawashima, H. (2015). Is empathizing in the E–S theory similar to agreeableness? The relationship between the EQ and SQ and major personality domains. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Xiang, J., Wen, J., Bian, W., Sun, L., & Bai, Z. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Empathy Quotient among Chinese minority college students. Annals of General Psychiatry, 17(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-018-0209-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Q., Neumann, D. L., Cao, X., Baron-Cohen, S., Sun, X., Cao, Y., Yan, C., Wang, Y., Shao, L., & Shum, D. H. K. (2018). Validation of the Empathy Quotient in mainland China. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1324458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Fernández et al. supplementary material

Fernández et al. supplementary material

Download Fernández et al. supplementary material(File)
File 47.1 KB