Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:34:39.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Character Cues Modulate the Affordance Effects during Danger Warning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2020

Liang Zhao Open the ORCID record for Liang Zhao [Opens in a new window]
Liang Zhao*
Affiliation:
Baoji University of Arts and Sciences (China)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Liang Zhao. Baoji University of Arts and Sciences. School of Education. No. 1 Hi-Tech Avenue, Baoji, 721013 Shaanxi (China). E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +917–3566366.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that perception of objects automatically evokes potential actions to interact with those objects; this is termed as affordance. The present study investigated how the corresponding affordance effect of graspable objects was modulated by the cue about risk levels of object. Participants were presented with pictures of dangerous graspable objects or neutral graspable objects. The participants were required to perform an upright/upside down discrimination task by pressing different keys. Results showed that both the affordance effects of dangerous object and neutral object in children were enhanced when a cue preceded the object, t(35) = 3.83, p < .01, Cohen’s d = 1.29. These results indicate that the prompt of risk level can improve individual’s appropriate manipulation to the object.

Keywords

cuerisk levelsobject affordance
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 23 , 2020 , e2
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosini, E., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Costantini, M. (2012). Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1551–1557. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2012). Grasping the pain: Motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1627–1639. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Bolzani, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2013). Keep away from danger: Dangerous objects in dynamic and static situations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 344. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 351. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouwer, A. M., Georgiou, I., Glover, S., & Castiello, U. (2006). Adjusting reach to lift movements to sudden visible changes in target’s weight. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 629–636. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0406-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. NeuroImage, 35, 940–948. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hudson, M., Nicholson, T., Simpson, W. A., Ellis, R., & Bach, P. (2016). One step ahead: The perceived kinematics of others’ actions are biased toward expected goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannerod, M., Arbib, M. A., Rizzolatti, G., & Sakata, H. (1995). Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neurosciences, 18, 314–320. http://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(95)93921-JCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makris, S., Hadar, A. A., & Yarrow, K. (2013). Are object affordances fully automatic? A case of covert attention. Behavioral Neuroscience, 127, 797–802. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0033946CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murata, A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Raos, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2226–2230. http://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.4.2226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, S., van Velzen, J., & de Fockert, J. W. (2012). The role of perceptual load in action affordance by ignored objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1122–1127. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0299-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myachykov, A., Ellis, R., Cangelosi, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2013). Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects. Experimental Brain Research, 229, 545–559. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3616-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panis, S., Vangeneugden, J., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Similarity, typicality, and category-level matching of morphed outlines of everyday objects. Perception, 37, 1822–1849. http://doi.org/10.1068/p5934CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panis, S., Vangeneugden, J., de Beeck, H. P. O., & Wagemans, J. (2008). The representation of subordinate shape similarity in human occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1167/8.10.9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: The effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2190–2201. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.486903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raos, V., Umiltá, M. A., Murata, A., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2006). Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 709–729. http://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00463.2005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar
Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., & Glenberg, A. (2009). Language-induced motor activity in bi-manual object lifting. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 43–53. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1593-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. B. (2005). Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science, 29, 665–679. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica, 124, 238–255. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830Google ScholarPubMed
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). Micro-affordance of grasp type in a visual categorization task. Visual Cognition, 8, 769–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umilta, M. A., Brochier, T., Spinks, R. L., & Lemon, R. N. (2007). Simultaneous recording of macaque premotor and primary motor cortex neuronal populations reveals different functional contributions to visuomotor grasp. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 488–501. http://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01094.2006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vingerhoets, G., Vandamme, K., & Vercammen, A. L. I. C. E. (2009). Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain and Cognition, 69, 481–489. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, L. (2017). Separate pathways for the processing of affordance of neutral and dangerous object. Current Psychology, 36, 833–839. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9472-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, L. (2018). The time course of response activation with dangerous objects. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21, e27. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, L., Bai, Y., Ma, J., & Wang, Y. (2015). Local control mechanisms of implicit and explicit conflicts. Experimental Psychology, 62, 153–160. http://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed