Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:38:59.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Category Learning in Schoolchildren. Its Relation to Age, Academic Marks and Resolution Patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2019

Cristina Casadevante Open the ORCID record for Cristina Casadevante [Opens in a new window] ,
Miriam Romero ,
Tatiana Fernández-Marcos  and
José Manuel Hernández
Cristina Casadevante*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Miriam Romero
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Tatiana Fernández-Marcos
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
José Manuel Hernández
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Cristina Casadevante. Departamento de Psicología Biológica y de la Salud de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Calle Iván Pavlov, 6, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this research was to study the learning process using an objective and computerized task. The performance of 466 schoolchildren aged between 6 and 11 in a category learning task, the Category Learning Test (CLT), was examined. The results showed evidence of category learning throughout the trials for the whole sample, F(7, 469) = 29.979, p <.001. In addition, categorization performance improved with age, H(2) = 48.475, p <.001. However, there were old children that struggled with the task and young children that performed very well. The ability to learn the categories was related to the children’s behavior when trying to solve the task: the response speed (r = –.217, p <.01) and the organization index (r = .247, p <.01). Nevertheless, performance in the task and academic marks were not related. We discuss the impact of these findings on the promotion and improvement of learning in schools: an intervention to promote slowness and organization might help some children to learn.

Keywords

category learningexecution patternsschoolchildrenresponse speed
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 22 , 2019 , E48
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article:

Casadevante, C., Romero, M., Fernández-Marcos, T., & Hernández, J. M. (2019). Category learning in schoolchildren. Its relation to age, academic marks and resolution patterns. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22. e48. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2019.56

References

Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2014). Overconfidence in children’s multi-trial judgments of learning. Learning and Instruction, 32, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, R., Diesendruck, G., Weinshall, D., & Hochstein, S. (2009). The development of category learning strategies: What makes the difference? Cognition, 112(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang-Pollock, C. L., Maddox, W. T., & Karalunas, S. L. (2011). Development of implicit and explicit category learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, J. M. (2000). Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minda, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2004). Learning categories by making predictions: An investigation of indirect category learning. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1355–1368. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meichenbaum, D. H., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minda, J. P., Desroches, A. S., & Church, B. A. (2008). Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: A comparison of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34(6), 1518–1533. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013355Google ScholarPubMed
Quiroga Estévez, M. A., Santacreu Mas, J., Montoro, A., Martínez-Molina, A., & Chun Shih, P. C. (2011). Evaluación informatizada de la atención para niños de 7 a 11 Años: El DiViSA-UAM y el TACI-UAM [Computerized assessment of attention for children from 7 to 11 years old: DiViSA-UAM and TACI-UAM]. Clínica y Salud, 22(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.5093/cl2011v22n1a1Google Scholar
Rabi, R., & Minda, J. P. (2014). Rule-based category learning in children: The role of age and executive functioning. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santacreu, J., & Quiroga, M. A. (2016). Some children do not learn even while paying attention: Their focus is on winning. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self-regulation and learning. In Weiner, I. B. (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology. Vol. 6. Educational Psychology (pp. 59–78). NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sloutsky, V. M. (2010). From perceptual categories to concepts: What develops?. Cognitive Science, 34(7), 1244–1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01129.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Loon, M., Destan, N., Spiess, M. A., de Bruin, A., & Roebers, C. M. (2017). Developmental progression in performance evaluations: Effects of children’s cue-utilization and self-protection. Learning and Instruction, 51, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Loon, M., de Bruin, A., Leppink, J., & Roebers, C. (2017). Why are children overconfident? Developmental differences in the implementation of accessibility cues when judging concept learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed