Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:36:16.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Categorization and Hierarchy of Workplace Bullying Strategies: A Delphi Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Álvaro Rodríguez-Carballeira ,
Jordi Escartín Solanelles ,
Bienvenido Visauta Vinacua ,
Clara Porrúa García  and
Javier Martín-Peña
Álvaro Rodríguez-Carballeira*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Jordi Escartín Solanelles
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Bienvenido Visauta Vinacua
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Clara Porrúa García
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Javier Martín-Peña
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Álvaro Rodríguez-Carballeira. Departamento de Psicología Social. Universidad de Barcelona. Pg. Vall d'Hebron, 171. 08035 Barcelona. (Spain). Phone: +34-933125178. Fax: +34-934021366. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports a study of the characteristics of psychological abuse strategies deployed in the workplace (mobbing or workplace bullying). Based on a literature review, the aim of the present study is two fold: firstly to propose a new taxonomy of mobbing strategies and to provide an operational definition for each of them, and secondly, to assess this taxonomy with the aid of several experts, by using a Delphi survey, and to evaluate the severity of each of the mobbing strategies. The experts were asked to evaluate the adequacy and the severity of the definitions for each mobbing strategy. Thirty experts working in various professions (psychology, medicine, law, sociology, etc.) participated in a two-round Delphi survey. The experts estimated that the new taxonomy and the operational definitions were appropriate, establishing content and construct validity. They ranked the workplace bullying strategies in terms of descending importance: strategies of direct nature, followed by indirect strategies. Theoretical implications of the study, its limitations and future research are discussed.

Este estudio psicosocial analiza las estrategias de abuso psicológico que se aplican en el lugar de trabajo (mobbing o bullying laboral). A partir de una revisión de la literatura científica, el primer objetivo pretende proponer una nueva clasificación de las estrategias del mobbing y dotar de una definición operativa a cada una de dichas estrategias. El segundo objetivo trata de evaluar esta clasificación y la severidad de las estrategias de mobbing a través del juicio de un panel de expertos utilizando para ello un estudio Delphi. Los expertos tuvieron que juzgar la adecuación de las estrategias y sus definiciones, y evaluar cuantitativamente la severidad de cada estrategia en el conjunto del mobbing. Treinta expertos de diferentes profesiones (psicólogos, médicos, abogados, sociólogos, etc.) participaron en el estudio Delphi de dos pasaciones. Los expertos juzgaron la nueva categorización y sus definiciones operativas como apropiadas estableciendo de este modo, validez de contenido y de constructo. Además, jerarquizaron las estrategias de mobbing resultando en su conjunto con mayor severidad las de naturaleza más directa, por encima de aquéllas más indirectas. Finalmente, se discuten los resultados y las limitaciones de esta investigación, así como las implicaciones teóricas y prácticas que pueden derivarse de ella.

Keywords

workplace bullyingmobbingworkplace violenceDelphi surveyseverityweighted scoresbullying laboralmobbingviolencia laboralmétodo Delphiseveridadpuntajes ponderados
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 297 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agervold, M. (2007). Bullying at work: A discussion of definitions and prevalence, based on an empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K. (2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: the effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26, 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, R., & Neumann, J. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behaviour, 22, 161–173.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkeland, M., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Sampling in research on interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behaviour, 33, 1–8.Google Scholar
Buss, A. (1961). The Psychology of Aggression. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, D., Pintabona, Y., Hamilton, G., & Hall, M. (2000). A Delphi study of successful practice in the prevention, reduction and management of bullying in schools. Bentley, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology, Western Australian Centre for Health Promotion Research.Google Scholar
Cross, D., Pintabona, Y., Hall, M., Hamilton, G., & Erceg, E. (2004). Validated guidelines for school-based bullying prevention and management. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 6(3), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, J.& Jogerst, G. (2005). Definitions and indicators of elder abuse: A Delphi survey of APS caseworkers. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 17(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, N., Schwartz, R., & Elliot, G. (2002). Mobbing. Emotional abuse in the American workplace. USA: Civil Society Publishing.Google Scholar
Delbecq, A., & Van de Ven, G. (1984). Técnicas grupales para la planeación. México: Ed. Trillas.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behaviour: A Review Journal, 4, 371–401.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (Eds). (2003). The Concept of Bullying at work. The European Tradition. In Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice. (pp. 3–30). London/New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E. (2003). Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (Eds), Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice. (pp. 127–144). London/New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Einarsen, S., & Raknes, I. (1997). Harassment at work and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escartín, J., Arrieta, C., & Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. (2009). Mobbing o Acoso laboral: Revisión de los principales aspectos teórico-metodológicos que dificultan su estudio. Actualidades en Psicología, 23(110), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escartín, J.; Rodríguez-Carballeira, A.; Gómez-Benito, J., Zapf, D. (in press). Development and validation of the workplace bullying scale (EAPA-T). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology.Google Scholar
Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Porrúa, C., & Martín-Peña, J. (2008). Estudio y análisis sobre cómo perciben el mobbing los trabajadores. Revista de Psicología Social, 23(2), 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Zapf, D., Porrúa, C., & Martín-Peña, J. (2009). Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying. Work and Stress, 23(3), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escartín, J., Zapf, D., Arrieta, C., & Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. (in press). Workers' perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.Google Scholar
Fendrich, M., Woodward, P., & Richman, J. (2002). The structure of harassment and abuse in the workplace: a factorial comparison of two measures. Violence and Victims, 17(4), 491–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In Cooper, C. and Payne, R. (Eds), Causes, coping, and consequences of stress at work. (pp. 375–411). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Glomb, T., & Liao, H. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutek, B. (1997). Sexual harassment policy initiatives. In: O'Donohue, W., (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research and treatment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, (pp. 185–198).Google Scholar
Hansen, A., Hogh, A., Persson, R., Karlson, B., Garde, A., & Orbaek, P. (2006). Bullying at work, health outcomes, and physiological stress response. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, D., & Phillips, J. (1997). Preventing sexual harassment. In Phillips, J. (Ed.), In action: Measuring return on investment, 2. (pp. 17–35). Alexandria: American Society for Training and Development.Google Scholar
Hoel, H., & Beale, D. (2006). Workplace bullying, psychological perspectives and industrial relations: towards a contextualised and interdisciplinary approach. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(2), 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoel, H., Einarsen, S., & Cooper, C. (2003). Organizational effects of bullying. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D. & Cooper, C. (Eds), Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice (pp. 145–161). London/New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hoel, H., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. (2004). Bullying is detrimental to health, but all bullying behaviours are not necessarily equally damaging. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 32(3), 367–387.Google Scholar
Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2, 216.Google Scholar
Hudson, M. (1991). Elder mistreatment: A taxonomy with definitions by Delphi. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 3(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennifer, D., Cowie, H., & Ananiadou, K. (2003). Perceptions and experience of workplace bullying in five different populations. Aggressive Behaviour, 29, 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keashly, L. (2001). Interpersonal and systemic aspects of emotional abuse at work: The target's perspective. Violence & Victims, 16(3), 233–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keashly, L., & Harvey, S. (2005). Emotional abuse at work. In Spector, P., & Fox, S. (Eds), Counterproductive workplace behaviour; an integration of both actor and recipient perspectives on causes and consequences (pp. 201–236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R., & Folkeman, S. (1986) Cognitive theories of stress and the issue of circularity. In Appley, M. L., & Trumbull, R. (Eds.), Dynamics of stress. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lengnick-Hall, M. (1995). Sexual harassment research: A methodological critique. Personnel Psychology 48, 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstone, H, & Turoff, M. (1995). The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2003). The communicative cycle of employee emotional abuse. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 471–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2007). Bad words will never hurt me: Abuse and bullying at work, a comparison between two worker samples. Ohio Communication Journal, 45, 27–52.Google Scholar
Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Tracy, S., & Alberts, J. (2007). Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 837–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magley, V., Hulin, C., Fitzgerald, L.; & Denardo, M. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 390–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martín-Peña, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, Á., Escartín, J., Porrúa, C.& Winkel, F. W. (2010). Strategies of psychological terrorism perpetrated by ETA's network: Delimitation and classification. Psicothema, 22(1), 118–123.Google ScholarPubMed
Mayhew, C., & Chappell, D. (2007). Workplace Violence: An overview of patterns of risk and the emotional/stress consequences on targets. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P. (2003). Bullying at work: a postmodern experience. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (Eds), Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace. International Perspectives in Research and Practice. (pp. 231–245). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Meseguer, M., Soler, M., García-Izquierdo, M., Sáez, M., & Sánchez, J. (2007). Los factores psicosociales de riesgo en el trabajo como predictores del mobbing. Psicothema, 19(2), 225–230.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, E., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moayed, F., Daraiseh, N., Shell, R., & Salem, S. (2006). Workplace bullying: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(3), 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, B., Rodríguez, A., Martínez, M., & Gálvez, M. (2007). Assessing workplace bullying: Spanish validation of a reduced version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 449–457.Google Scholar
Niedl, K. (1996). Mobbing and Well-being: Economic and Personnel Development Implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, L. (2003). Workplace bullying, psychological distress, and job satisfaction in junior doctors. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Ethics, 12, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, C. (1999). From Research to implementation: finding leverage for prevention. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, C., & Hoel, H. (1997). A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 181–191.Google Scholar
Reetoo, K., Harrington, J., & Macdonald, E. (2005). Required competencies of occupational physicians - a Delphi survey of UK customers. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 62, 406–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richman, J., Rospenda, K., Nawyn, S., Flaherty, J., Fendrich, M., & Drum, M. (1999). Sexual harassment and generalized workplace abuse among university employees: Prevalence and mental health correlates. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: a review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the life experiences survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, P., Huynh, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2007). Defining workplace bullying behaviour professional lay definitions of workplace bullying. Law and Psychiatry, 30, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R., & Liefooghe, A. (2002). Definitions of bullying; a comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child development, 73(4), 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockdale, M., Bisom-Rapp, S., O'Connor, M., & Gutek, B. (2004). Coming to terms with zero-tolerance sexual harassment policies. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R., & Wheaton, B. (1995). Checklist measurement of stressful life events. In Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (Eds.), Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. (pp. 29–58). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. (1996). Computer Based Delphi Processes. In Adler, M. & Ziglio, E. (Eds.), Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Yamada, D. (2000). The phenomenon of “Worplace Bullying” and the need for Status-Blind Hostile Work Environment Protection. The Georgetown Law Journal, 88(3), 474–536.Google Scholar
Yamada, D. (2004). Crafting a legislative response to workplace bullying. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 8, 474–521.Google Scholar
Zapf, D. (1999). Organizational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2003). Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (Eds.), Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace. International Perspectives in Research and Practice. (pp. 103–126). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Zapf, D., Escartín, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2010). Empirical findings on the prevalence rate and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Development in theory, research and practice. London & New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Zapf, D., & Gross, C. (2001). Conflict escalation and coping with workplace bullying: A replication and extension. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 497–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapf, D., Knorf, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationships between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar