Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:10:06.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: can Beliefs about Voices Mediate the Relationship Patients establish with them and Negative Affect?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2015

María de Gracia León-Palacios
Affiliation:
Hospital Virgen del Rocío (Spain)
Juan Úbeda-Gómez
Affiliation:
Hospital Virgen del Rocío (Spain)
Silvia Escudero-Pérez
Affiliation:
Hospital Virgen del Rocío (Spain)
María Dolores Barros-Albarán
Affiliation:
Hospital Virgen del Rocío (Spain)
Ana María López-Jiménez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
Salvador Perona-Garcelán*
Affiliation:
Hospital Virgen del Rocío (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Salvador Perona-Garcelán. Servicio Andaluz de Salud - Hospital de Dia de Salud Mental Virgen del Rocío. Sevilla (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study was designed to find out whether a person’s relationship with his voices and the negative affect he suffers from are mediated by beliefs about the voices. Research done to date shows contradictory results (Sorrell, Hayward, & Meddings, 2010, Vaughan & Fowler, 2004). A cross-sectional study was done to study the associations among variables, and a multiple mediation model (Preacher & Hayes, 2008) in which the beliefs about voices were the mediating variables was tested. Sixty subjects who heard voices participated. The VAY (Hayward, Denney, Vaughan, & Fowler, 2008), BAVQ (Chadwick & Birchwood, 1995), BAI (Beck & Steer, 1993) and BDI-II (Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996) were given. We found a significant positive correlation between perception of voices as dominant and intrusive and maintaining a position of distance from them on one hand, and negative affect [anxiety (r = .57, p < .001; r = .40, p < .001; r = .34, p < .01 respectively) and depression (r = .58, p < .001; r = .37, p < .01; r = .38, p < .001 respectively)] on the other. We also found that beliefs of malevolence and omnipotence mediated between relating style and negative affect (anxiety and depression). The theoretical implications of the results and clinical implications of the mediating relationships found are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aleman, A., & LarØi, F. (2008). Hallucinations: The science of idiosyncratic perception. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1993). Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L. S. (1989). Is chronicity a function of the relationship between the person and the auditory hallucinations? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15, 291310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/15.2.291 Google Scholar
Birchwood, M., & Chadwick, P. (1997). The omnipotence of voices: Testing the validity of a cognitive model. Psychological Medicine, 27, 13451353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291797005552 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birchwood, M., Gilbert, P., Gilbert, J., Trower, P., Meaden, A., Hay, J., … Miles, J. N. V. (2004). Interpersonal and role-related schema influence the relationship with the dominant voice in schizophrenia: A comparison of three models. Psychological Medicine, 34, 15711580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291704002636 Google Scholar
Birchwood, M., Meaden, A., Trower, P., Gilbert, P., & Plaistow, J. (2000). The power and omnipotence of voices: Subordination and entrapment by voices and significant others. Psychological Medicine, 30, 337344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291799001828 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birtchnell, J. (2002). Relating in psychotherapy: The application of a new theory. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. J. (2006). Person-based cognitive therapy for distressing psychosis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P., & Birchwood, M. (1994). The omnipotence of voices: A cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 190201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.164.2.190 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadwick, P., & Birchwood, M. (1995). The omnipotence of voices II: The Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ). British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 773776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.166.6.773 Google Scholar
Chadwick, P., Lees, S., & Birchwood, M. (2000). The revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R). British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 229232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.3.229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, H., & Garety, P. (1998). Cognitive assessment of voices: Further developments in understanding the emotional impact of voices. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 173188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01292.x Google Scholar
Dannahy, L., Hayward, M., Strauss, C., Turton, W., Harding, E., & Chadwick, P. (2011). Group person-based cognitive therapy for distressing voices: Pilot data from nine groups. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 111116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.07.006 Google Scholar
Hayward, M., Berry, K., & Ashton, A. (2011). Applying interpersonal theories to the understanding of and therapy for auditory hallucinations: A review of the literature and directions for further research. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 13131323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M., Berry, K., McCarthy-Jones, S., Strauss, C., & Thomas, N. (2014). Beyond the omnipotence of voices: Further developing a relational approach to auditory hallucinations. Psychosis, 6, 242252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2013.839735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M, Denney, J., Vaughan, S., & Fowler, D. (2008). The Voice and You: Development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of relationships with voices. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15, 4552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.561 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & Lindenmayer, J. P. (1988). Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics. Psychiatry Research, 23, 99110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(88)90038-8 Google Scholar
Mawson, A., Cohen, K., & Berry, K. (2010). Reviewing evidence for the cognitive model of auditory hallucinations: The relationship between cognitive voice appraisals and distress during psychosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 248258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.006 Google Scholar
Moskowitz, A., & Corstens, D. (2008). Auditory hallucinations: Psychotic symptom or dissociative experience? Journal of Psychology Trauma, 6, 3563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J513v06n02_04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulik, G. (2012). The role of social schema in the experience of auditory hallucinations: A systematic review and a proposal for the inclusion of social schema in a cognitive behavioural model of voice hearing. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 19, 459472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.768 Google Scholar
Paulik, G., Hayward, M., & Birchwood, M. (2013). Cognitive Behavioural Relating Therapy (CBRT) for voice hearers: A case study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 41, 626631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465812001014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perona-Garcelán, S., Úbeda-Gómez, J., León-Palacios, M. G., Barros-Albarrán, M. D., Escudero-Pérez, S., López-Jiménez, A. M., & Hayward, M. (2014). An exploration of the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the “Voice and You” (VAY): A scale for measuring the relationship with voices. (Manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879891. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robles-García, R., Páez-Agraz, F., Zúñiga-Partida, O., Rizo-Méndez, A., & Hernández-Villanueva, E. (2004). Beliefs about voices questionnaire (BAVQ): Spanish translation and psychometric properties. Actas Españolas de Neuropsiquiatría, 32, 358362.Google Scholar
Romme, M., & Escher, S. (1996). Empowering people who hear voices. In Haddock, G. & Slade, P. D. (Eds.), Cognitive-Behavioural interventions with psychotic disorders. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Romme, M., & Escher, S. (2000). Making sense of voices. A guide for mental health professionals working with voice-hearers. London, UK: Mind Publications.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., & Navarro, M. E. (2003). Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in university students. Ansiedad y Estrés, 9, 5984.Google Scholar
Sanz, J., Perdigón, A. L., & Vázquez, C. (2003). The Spanish adaptation of Beck´s Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II): 2. Psychometric properties in the general population. Clínica y Salud, 14, 249280.Google Scholar
Sorrell, E., Hayward, M., & Meddings, S. (2010). Interpersonal processes and auditory hallucinations: A study of the association between relating to voices and distress in clinical and non-clinical hearers. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 127140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809990506 Google Scholar
Vaughan, S., & Fowler, D. (2004). The distress experienced by voice hearers is associated with the perceived relationship between the voice hearer and the voice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 143153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466504323088024 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar