Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:44:33.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Reading Precursors in Spanish-Speaking Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

Anibal Puente ,
Jesús M. Alvarado ,
Paz Fernández ,
Mónica Rosselli ,
Alfredo Ardila  and
Amelia Jiménez
Anibal Puente*
Affiliation:
Universidad Andrés Bello (Chile)
Jesús M. Alvarado
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Paz Fernández
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Mónica Rosselli
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University (USA)
Alfredo Ardila
Affiliation:
Florida International University (USA)
Amelia Jiménez
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Anibal Puente. Instituto de Estudios Biofuncionales. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Paseo Juan XXIII, N° 1. 28040. Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study’s purpose was to analyse basic reading processes in different age groups of Spanish-speaking children using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and regression analysis. Two hundred forty-five children (aged 4 years and 9 months, to 9 years and 7 months; 120 boys, 125 girls), native Spanish-speakers, were selected from schools in Madrid. All participants were in either their last year of preschool or the first three years of elementary school, depending on their age. Nine classic reading tasks were created and administered to measure three reading skills: word recognition, phonological awareness, and reading comprehension. The results of the CFA show that data fit to proposed model with a general reading factor based on these three reading skills χ2(27) = 29.03, p = .36, RMSEA = .02, 90% CIs [.0, .05], CFI = 1.0. The word recognition skills were the best at describing reading performance in preschool children (R2 = .51 for word identification task); phonological awareness, especially rhyme identification task, discriminated well until second grade (R2 = .60); and finally, reading comprehension, basically phrase completion task, were the best measure of reading performance in third grade (R2 = .45).

Keywords

phonological awarenessreading comprehensionSpanish languageword recognition
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E85
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alegría, J. (2006). Por un enfoque psicolingüístico del aprendizaje de la lectura y sus dificultades – 20 años después [Toward a psycholinguistic approach to reading acquisition and reading difficulties – 20 years later]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29, 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, S., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2015). Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 868–883. http://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2014). Correlates of early reading comprehension skills: A componential analysis. Educational Psychology, 34, 185–207. http://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785045 Google Scholar
Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.26.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421. http://doi.org/10.1038/301419a0 Google Scholar
Bravo, L., Villalón, M., & Orellana, E. (2001). Procesos predictivos del aprendizaje inicial de la lectura en primero básico [Processes that predict initial reading acquisition in first-graders]. Boletín de Investigación Educacional, 16, 149–160.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., & Bradley, L. (1985). Children’s reading problems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bryne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451–455. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. J. (1998). The foundation of literacy: The child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Calet, N., Gutiérrez-Palma, N., & Defior, S. (2015). A cross-sectional study of fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 272–285. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12019 Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Málková, G. S., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth, in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398–1407. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612473122 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavsky, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., … Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536 Google Scholar
Carrillo, M. S. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition: A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing, 6, 279–298. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027086 Google Scholar
Carrillo, M. S., & Marín, J. (1996). Desarrollo metafonológico y adquisición de la lectura: Un programa de entrenamiento [Metaphonological development and reading acquisition: A training program]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, CIDE.Google Scholar
Casillas, A., & Goikoetxea, E. (2007). Sílaba, principio-rima y fonema como predictores de la lectura y la escritura tempranas [Syllable, onset-rime, and phoneme as early reading and writing precursors]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30, 245–259. http://doi.org/10.1174/021037007780705184 Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50. http://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 426–443. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0026714 Google Scholar
Cuban, L. (1992). Why some reforms last: The case of the kindergarten. American Journal of Education, 100, 166–194. http://doi.org/10.1086/444013 Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 429–444. http://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(90)90079-N Google Scholar
Defior, S., Cary, L., & Martos, F. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135–148. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402000073 Google Scholar
Defior, S., Justicia, F., & Martos, F. (1998). Desarrollo del reconocimiento de palabras en lectores normales y retrasados en función de diferentes variables lingüísticas [The development of word recognition in normal and delayed readers as a function of several linguistic variables]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 21, 59–74. http://doi.org/10.1174/021037098760403479 Google Scholar
Defior, S., & Tudela, P. (1994). Effect of phonological training on reading and writing acquisition. Reading & Writing, 6, 299–320. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.450 Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77. http://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Poe, M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy. The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge in preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 47–69. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.465 Google Scholar
Domínguez, A. B. (1996). El desarrollo de habilidades de análisis fonológico a través de programas de enseñanza [Development of phonological awareness skills through teaching programs]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 19, 69–81. http://doi.org/10.1174/021037096762905562 Google Scholar
Domínguez, A., & Cuetos, F. (1992). Desarrollo de las habilidades de reconocimiento de palabras en niños con distintas competencias lectoras [Development of word-recognition skills in children with different reading competencies]. Cognitiva, 4, 193–208.Google Scholar
Dowing, J. A. (1963). Is a mental age of six essential for reading readiness? Educational Research, 6, 16–28. http://doi.org/10.1080/0013188640060103 Google Scholar
Dufva, M., Niemi, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing, 14, 91–117. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008186801932 Google Scholar
Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Gough, P., Ehri, L., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Eldredge, J. L., Quinn, B., & Butterfield, D. D. (1990). Causal relationships between phonics, reading comprehension, and vocabulary achievement in the second grade. The Journal of Educational Research, 83, 201–214. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885957 Google Scholar
Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 85–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005 Google Scholar
Gallego, C. (2006, March). Los prerrequisitos lectores [Reading prerequisites]. Proceedings from the Congreso Internacional de Lectoescritura, Morelia, México.Google Scholar
García-Madruga, J. A. (2006). Comprensión de la lectura y memoria operativa [Reading comprehension and working memory]. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological and lexical processes. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P., & Barr, R.. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 251–267. Vol. 3). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2002). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. In Neuman, S. & Dickinson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 111–125). London, UK: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. http://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104 Google Scholar
Guardia, P. (2003). Relaciones entre habilidades de alfabetización emergente y la lectura desde nivel de transición mayor a primero básico [Links between emerging literacy skills and reading skills after first grade]. Psykhe, 12, 63–79.Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Palma, N., Raya-García, M., & Palma-Reyes, A. (2009). Detecting stress patterns is related to children’s performance on reading tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408090012 Google Scholar
Herrera, L., & Defior, S. (2005). Una aproximación al procesamiento fonológico de los niños prelectores: Conciencia fonológica, memoria verbal a corto plazo y denominación [An Approach to the phonological processing in prereading Spanish children: Phonological awareness, verbal short-term memory and naming]. Psykhe, 14, 81–95. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282005000200007 Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge—of words and the world. Scientific insights into the fourth-grade slump and the nation’s stagnant comprehension scores. American Educator, 27, 10–13.Google Scholar
Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010). Does speech rhythm sensitivity predict children’s reading ability 1 year later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 356–366. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018049 Google Scholar
Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2012). A cross-sectional study of prosodic sensitivity and reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 32–48. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01459.x Google Scholar
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799 Google Scholar
IBM Corporation (2010). SPSS statistics for Windows, version 19.0 (computer software). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. E., & Ortiz, M. R. (1995). Conciencia fonológica y aprendizaje de la lectura: Teoría, evaluación e intervención [Phonological awareness and reading acquisition: Theory, assessment, and intervention]. Madrid, Spain: Síntesis.Google Scholar
Jiménez Glez, J. E., & Rodrigo López, M. (1994). Is it true that the differences in reading performance between students with and without LD cannot be explained by IQ? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 155–163. http://doi.org/10.1177/002221949402700304 Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows (computer software). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F. (1983). Specific reading retardation and working memory: A review. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 311–342. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01865.x Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., & Pallante, D. (2012). Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25, 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0 Google Scholar
Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040–1048. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02405.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovett, M. W., Borden, S. L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N. J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805–822. http://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.30.6.805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.23.3.1 Google Scholar
Miles, T. R., & Ellis, N. C. (1981). A lexical encoding difficulty II: Clinical observations. In Pavlidis, G. T. & Miles, T. R. (Eds.), Dyslexia research and its applications to education (pp. 230–235). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Müller, K., & Brady, S. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing, 14, 757–799. http://doi.org/10.1023/a:101221770483 Google Scholar
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. http://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219 Google Scholar
Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading development? Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 3–26. http://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_2 Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. http://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730 Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). How should reading be taught? Scientific American, 286, 85–91. http://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0302-84 Google Scholar
Rosselli, M., Mature, E., & Ardila, A. (2006). Predictores neuropsicológicos de la lectura en español [Neuropsychological reading precursors in Spanish]. Revista de Neurología, 42, 202–210.Google Scholar
Sánchez, E., García, J. R., & Bustos, A. (2010). La comprensión oral y escrita: ¿Es la decodificación de las palabras la única diferencia? [Oral and written comprehension: Is word decoding the only difference?] In Carrillo, M. S. & Domínguez, A. B. (Eds.), Dislexia y sordera: Líneas actuales en el estudio de la lengua escrita y sus dificultades [Dyslexia and deafness: Current research directions and difficulties in written language] (pp. 37–60). Málaga, Spain: Ediciones Aljibe.Google Scholar
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265 Google Scholar
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. http://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 Google Scholar
Serrano, F., Defior, S., & Jiménez, G. (2005). Evolución de la relación entre conciencia fonológica y lenguaje escrito en niños españoles de primer curso de educación primaria [The evolving relationship between phonological awareness and written language in first-grade Spanish children]. IberPsicología. Anales de la Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 10, 3–15.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. http://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859 Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2004). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 213–233. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.005 Google Scholar
Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: A model of acquisition and individual differences. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Sprugevica, I., & Høien, T. (2003). Enabling skills in early reading acquisition: A study of children in Latvian kindergarten. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 159–177. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022843607921 Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of children with reading-disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.24 Google Scholar
Suárez-Coalla, P., García-de-Castro, M., & Cuetos, F. (2013). Variables predictoras de la lectura y la escritura en castellano [Variables that predict reading and writing in Spanish]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36, 77–89. http://doi.org/10.1174/021037013804826537 Google Scholar
Suggate, S. P. (2010). Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1556–1579. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020612 Google Scholar
Torgeson, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1999). The comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Faisca, L., Reis, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 827–842. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019465 Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2002). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction and individual differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: The case for early intervention. In Neuman, S. & Dickinson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 295–321). London, UK: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32. http://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1101_2 Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., & Torgeson, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological awareness and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 Google Scholar
Warmington, M., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phoneme awareness, visual-verbal paired-associate learning, and rapid automatized naming as predictors of individual differences in reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 45–62. http://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.534832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test–3 (WRAT-3). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.668 Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised (WRMT-R). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., … Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363406 Google Scholar
Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21–29.Google Scholar