Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:51:53.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are Facial Displays Social? Situational Influences in the Attribution of Emotion to Facial Expressions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

José-Miguel Fernández-Dols*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Pilar Carrera
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
James A. Russell
Affiliation:
Boston College
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to José-Miguel Fernández-Dols, Facultad de Psicologia.Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco. 28049 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Observers are remarkably consistent in attributing particular emotions to particular facial expressions, at least in Western societies. Here, we suggest that this consistency is an instance of the fundamental attribution error. We therefore hypothesized that a small variation in the procedure of the recognition study, which emphasizes situational information, would change the participants' attributions. In two studies, participants were asked to judge whether a prototypical “emotional facial expression” was more plausibly associated with a social-communicative situation (one involving communication to another person) or with an equally emotional but nonsocial, situation. Participants were found more likely to associate each facial display with the social than with the nonsocial situation. This result was found across all emotions presented (happiness, fear, disgust, anger, and sadness) and for both Spanish and Canadian participants.

La atribución de emociones a determinadas expresiones faciales es un fenómeno notablemente robusto, al menos en las sociedades occidentales. En este artículo proponemos que la consistencia de dichas atribuciones es un caso de error fundamental de atribución. Si nuestra hipótesis es correcta, pequeñas variaciones en el procedimiento de los estudios típicos sobre reconocimiento de emociones (dando un mayor énfasis a la información situacional) cambiarán de manera sustantiva la forma en la que los perceptores atribuyen emociones a las expresiones faciales. Para comprobar dicha hipótesis hemos llevado a cabo dos estudios en los que los participantes deben decidir si una expresión prototípica de emoción se asocia con una situación social (que implica comunicación con otra persona) o con una situación emocional pero no social. Nuestros sujetos asociaron la expresión facial con la situación social, en lugar de la no social. Los resultados fueron los mismos para todas las emociones consideradas (alegría, miedo, asco, enfado y tristeza) y tanto para sujetos españoles como para los canadienses.

Type
Research trends
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Camras, L.A., Grow, V.G., & Ribordy, S.C. (1983). Recognition of emotional expression by abused children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 325328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.M., & Russell, J.A. (1996). Do facial expressions signal specific emotions? Judging the face in context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 205218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotions. In Cole, J. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 19. 1971 (pp. 207283). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, H.A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Dols, J.M. (1999). Facial expression and emotion: A situationist view. In Philippot, P., Feldman, R.S., & Coats, E.J. (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior (pp. 242261). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A.J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klineberg, O. (1940). Social psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFFE). Slide and brochure. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State University. (Available from the first author.)Google Scholar
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 174221.Google Scholar
Russell, J.A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expressions? A review of cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 426450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J.A., Bachorowski, J-A., & Fernández-Dols, J.M. (in press). Facial and vocal expressions of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology.Google Scholar
Russell, J.A., & Bullock, M. (1985). Multidimensional scaling of emotional facial expressions: Similarity from preschoolers to adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 12901298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J.A., & Fernández-Dols, J.M. (1997). What does a facial expression mean? In Russell, J.A. & Fernández-Dols, J.M. (Eds.), The psychology of facial expression (pp. 330). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar