Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T22:23:27.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anxiety and Coping Strategies in Sport Contexts: A Look at the Psychometric Properties of Portuguese Instruments for their Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Cláudia Dias ,
José Fernando Cruz  and
António Manuel Fonseca
Cláudia Dias*
Affiliation:
Universidade do Porto (Portugal)
José Fernando Cruz
Affiliation:
Universidade do Minho (Portugal)
António Manuel Fonseca
Affiliation:
Universidade do Porto (Portugal)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Claudia Dias. Rua Dr. Plácido Costa, 91. 4200-450 Porto, Portugal. Telephone number: +351 225 074 700. Fax number: +351 225 500 689. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Portuguese versions of the Sport Anxiety Scale and of the Brief COPE, as well as of the Cognitive Appraisal Scale in Sport Competition– Threat Perception, namely regarding their factor structure validity and internal consistency. Participants were 550 male and female athletes of several sports, aged 15 to 35 years old (M=19.8; SD=4.5). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that the instruments demonstrated good psychometric properties. In general, the measurement models provided a good fit to the empirical data and with the exception of some scales of the Brief COPE, the calculated Cronbach's a coefficient of reliability indicated adequate internal consistency for the three instruments. Overall, the results of the present study provided evidence for these instruments' validity and reliability, ultimately supporting their importance for research and psychological intervention in sport contexts.

El objetivo de este studio fue examinar las propiedades psicométricas de las versiones portuguesas del Sport Anxiety Scale, el Brief COPE, y el Cognitive Appraisal Scale in Sport Competition– Threat Perception, atendiendo a su validez de estructura factorial y consistencia interna. Los participantes fueron 550 atletas de ambos sexos y diversos deportes con edades entre 15 y 35 años (M=19.8; DT=4.5). Los análisis factoriales exploratorio y confirmatorio indicaron que los instrumentos mostraban buenas propiedades psicométricas. En general, los modelos de medida proporcionaron un buen ajuste a los datos empíricos y, con la excepción de algunas escalas del Brief COPE, el coeficiente de fiabilidad de Cronbach indicó una consistencia interna adecuada de los tres instrumentos. Globalmente los resultados de este estudio proporcionaron evidencia de la fiabilidad y validez de los citados instrumentos, reforzando su importancia para la investigación y la intervención psicológicas en contextos deportivos.

Keywords

stressanxietycopingassessmentpsychometric propertiesstressansiedadafrontamientoevaluaciónpropiedades psicométricas
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 338 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsen, F. E., Roberts, G. C., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2006). An examination of the factorial structure of the Norwegian version of the Sport Anxiety Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 16 (5), 358–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbosa, L. G. (1996). Stress, ansiedade e estratégias de confronto psicológico no andebol de alta competição [Stress, anxiety and psychological coping strategies in high level handball]. Unpublished master's dissertation. Braga: University of Minho (Portugal).Google Scholar
Barbosa, L. G., & Cruz, J. F. (1997). Estudo do stress, da ansiedade e das estratégias de confronto psicológico no andebol de alta competição [A study of stress, anxiety and psychological coping strategies in high level handball]. Psicologia: Teoria, Investigação e Prática, 2, 523–548.Google Scholar
Brissette, I., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2002). The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life translation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (1), 102–111.Google Scholar
Burkholder, G. J., & Harlow, L. L. (2003). An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10 (3), 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the Brief Cope. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4 (1), 92–100.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Pozo, C., Harris, S. D., Noriega, V., Scheier, M. F., Robinson, D. S., Ketcham, A. S., Moffat, F. L. Jr., & Clark, K. C. (1993). How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 375–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1994). Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.Google Scholar
Crocker, P. R., Kowalski, K. C., & Graham, T. R. (1998). Measurement of coping strategies in sport. In Duda, J. L. (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 149–161). Morgantown WV: Fitness Technology Inc.Google Scholar
Cruz, J. F. (1994). Stress, ansiedade e rendimento na competição desportiva: A importância das competências e processos psicológicos [Stress, anxiety and performance in sport competition: The importance of psychological skills and processes]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Braga: University of Minho (Portugal).Google Scholar
Cruz, J. F. (1996). Stress, ansiedade e rendimento na competição desportiva [Stress, anxiety and performance in sport competition.]. Braga: Research Centre of Studies in Education and Psychology, Institute of Education and Psychology, University of Minho (Portugal).Google Scholar
Cruz, J. F. (1997). Stress, ansiedade e competências psicológicas em atletas de elite e de alta competição: Relação com o sucesso desportivo [Stress, anxiety and psychological skills in elite and high level athletes: Its relation with sport sucess.]. In Cruz, J., & Gomes, A. R. (Eds.), Psicologia Aplicada ao Desporto e à Actividade Física: Teoria, Investigação e Intervenção [Psychology Applied to Sport and Physical Activity: Theory, Investigation and Intervention] (pp. 111–140). Braga: University of Minho and Portuguese Psychologists Association (Portugal).Google Scholar
Cruz, J. F., & Viana, M. F. (1997). Escala de Ansiedade do Desporto: Características e validade da adaptação portuguesa [Sport Anxiety Scale: Characteristics and validity of the Portuguese version.]. In Cruz, J., & Gomes, A. R. (Eds.), Psicologia Aplicada ao Desporto e à Actividade Física: Teoria, Investigação e Intervenção [Psychology Applied to Sport and Physical Activity: Theory, Investigation and Intervention] (pp. 349–365). Braga: University of Minho and Portuguese Psychologists Association (Portugal).Google Scholar
Dias, A., Palha, A., & Cruz, J. F. (1997). Aspectos psicológicos nas lesões desportivas: Um estudo com atletas de diferentes níveis competitivos [Psychological aspects in sport injuries: A study with athletes from different competitive levels. In Cruz, J., & Gomes, A. R. (Eds.), Psicologia Aplicada ao Desporto e à Actividade Física: Teoria, Investigação e Intervenção [Psychology Applied to Sport and Physical Activity: Theory, Investigation and Intervention] (pp. 235–254). Braga: University of Minho and Portuguese Psychologists Association (Portugal).Google Scholar
Dugdale, J. R., Eklund, R. C., & Gordon, S. (2002). Expected and unexpected stressors in major international competitive: Appraisal, coping, and performance. The Sport Psychologist, 16, 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. G. & Nielsen, A. B. (1993). A between-sport comparison of situational threat perceptions in ice hockey and soccer. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. G. H., Dunn, J. C., Wilson, P., & Syrotuik, D. G. (2000). Reexamining the factorial composition and factor structure of the Sport Anxiety Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 183–193.Google Scholar
Eklund, R. C., Grove, R., & Heard, N. P. (1998). The measurement of slump-related coping: Factorial validity of the COPE and modified-COPE inventories. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 157–175.Google Scholar
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (research edition). California: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Fonseca, A. M., & Fox, K. (2003). Como avaliar o modo como as pessoas se percebem fisicamente? Um olhar sobre a versão portuguesa do Physical Self Perception Profile (PSPP) [How to evaluate the way people perceive themselves physically? A look into the Portuguese version of the Physical Self-Perception Profile (PSPP)]. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto [Portuguese Journal of Sport Sciences], 2, 112–116.Google Scholar
Gaudreau, P., & Blondin, J.-P. (2002). Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of coping strategies employed by athletes in competitive sport settings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacobbi, P. R., & Weinberg, R. S. (2000). An examination of coping in sport: Individual trait anxiety differences and situational consistency. The Sport Psychologist, 14, 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, D., Eklund, R. C., & Jackson, S. A. (1993). Coping strategies used by U.S. Olympic wrestlers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, D., Finch, L. M., & Jackson, S. A. (1993). Coping strategies used by national champion figure skaters. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, D., & Krane, V. (1992). The arousal-athletic performance relationship: Current status and future directions. In Horn, T. S (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (pp. 119–141). Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Hammermeister, J., & Burton, D. (2001). Stress, appraisal, and coping revisited: Examining the antecedents of competitive state anxiety with endurance athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 15, 66–90.Google Scholar
Hardy, L., Jones, J. G., & Gould, D. (1996). Understanding psychological preparation for sport: Theory and practice of elite performers. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Harlow, L. L., Burkholder, G. J., & Morrow, J. A. (2002). Evaluating attitudes, skill, and performance in a learning-enhanced quantitative methods course: A structural modelling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9 (3), 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, N. L., & Hogg, J. M. (2002). Perceptions of stress and coping during preparation for the 1999 women's soccer world cup finals. The Sport Psychologist, 16, 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Hudek-Kneževicv, J., Kardum, I., & Vukmirović, (1999). The structure of coping styles: A comparative study of croatian samples. European Journal of Personality, 13, 149–161.Google Scholar
Jones, G., & Hanton, S. (1996). Interpretation of competitive anxiety symptoms and goal attainment expectancies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 18, 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G, Swain, A., & Cale, A. (1990). Antecedents of multidimensional competitive state anxiety and self-confidence in elite intercollegiate middle-distance runners. The Sport Psychologist, 4, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's guide. Mooresville: IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modelling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10 (3), 333–351.Google Scholar
Krane, V., Williams, J. M., & Feltz, D. (1992). Path analysis examining relationships among cognitive anxiety somatic anxiety, state confidence, performance expectations, and golf performance. Journal of Sport Behavior, 15, 279–295.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. In Hanin, Y.L. (Ed.), Emotions in sport (pp. 39–63). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Maia, J. (1996). Um discurso metodológico em torno da validade de construto: Posições de um lisrelita [A methodological discourse on construct validity: Opinions of a lisrelit]. In Almeida, L., Araújo, S., Gonçalves, M., Machado, C., & Simões, M. (Eds.), Avaliação Psicológica: Formas e Contextos [Psychological assessment: Forms and contexts] (vol. IV, pp. 43–59). Braga: Portuguese Psychologists Association (Portugal).Google Scholar
Maia, J., Almeida, P., Morais, D. P., & Garganta, R. (1997). Invariância estrutural da escala do auto-conceito físico: Um estudo de análise factorial confirmatória em jovens dos dois sexos dos 13 aos 15 anos de idade [Structural invariance of the physical sef-concept scale: A study of confirmatory factor analysis in youngsters from both sexes aged 13–15 years old.]. In Gonçalves, M., Ribeiro, I., Araújo, S., Machado, C., Almeida, L., & Simões, M. (Eds.), Avaliação Psicológica: Formas e Contextos [Psychological assessment: Forms and contexts] (Vol. V, pp. 526–537). Braga: Portuguese Psychologists Association (Portugal).Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1998). Age and gender effects in physical self–concepts for adolescent elite athletes and nonathletes: A multicohort–multi–occasion design. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., & Jackson, S. A. (1999). Flow experience in sport: Construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (4), 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, R., Vealey, R. S., & Burton, D. (1990). Competitive anxiety in sport. Champaign, IL: Human KineticsGoogle Scholar
Motl, R. W., & DiStefano, C. (2002). Longitudinal invariance of self-esteem and methods effects associated with negatively worded items. Structural Equation Modeling, 9 (4), 562–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, S., & Tammen, V. (1998). In search of psychological skills. In Duda, J. L. (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 195–209). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pensgaard, A.M., Roberts, G.C., & Ursin, H. (1999). Motivational factors and coping stragegies of Norwegian Paralympic and Olympic winter sport athletes. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 238–250.Google Scholar
Perczek, R., Carver, C. S., Price, A., & Pozo-Kaderman, C. (2000). Coping, mood, and aspects of personality in Spanish translation and evidence of convergence with English versions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74 (1), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repka, E., Man, F., Stuchlikova, I., & Hosek, V. (1993). The Sport Anxiety Scale. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica, 29 (2), 15–28.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, R. (1996). Expectativas de auto-eficácia, auto-confiança e rendimento na natação de alta competição [Self-efficacy expectancies, self-confidence, and performance in high level swimming]. Unpublished master's dissertation. Braga: University of Minho (Portugal).Google Scholar
Santos, P. J., & Maia, J. (2003). Análise factorial confirmatória e validação preliminar de uma versão portuguesa da escala de auto-estima de Rosenberg [Confirmatory factor analysis and preliminary validation of a Portuguese version of the Rosenberg's self-esteem scale]. Psicologia: Teoria, Investigação e Prática, 2, 253–268.Google Scholar
Schutz, R. W., & Gessaroli, M. E. (1993). Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. In Singer, R. N., Murphey, M. & Tennant, L. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology (pp. 901–917). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E., Schutz, R., Smoll, F. L., & Ptacek, J. T. (1995). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of sport-specific psychological skills: The Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 379–398.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E., Smoll, F. L. & Schutz, R. W. (1990). Measurement and correlates of sport-specific cognitive and somatic trait anxiety: The Sport Anxiety Scale. Anxiety Research, 2, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar