Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:28:53.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey on a Representative Sample of Dominican Teachers: Normative Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2016

José M. Tomás ,
Saturnino de los Santos ,
Alicia Alonso-Andres  and
Irene Fernández
José M. Tomás*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Saturnino de los Santos
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)
Alicia Alonso-Andres
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Irene Fernández
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Professor José M. Tomás. Department of Methodology for the Behavioral Sciences. Faculty of Psychology. University of Valencia. Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21. 46020. Valencia (Spain). Phone: +34–963864420. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and lack of personal accomplishment (Bakke, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2014). Several instruments for its measurement exist, but the most widely used scale for measuring its dimensions, by far, is the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) in its different versions. Among the available versions of the scale, the MBI-General Survey was developed to measure three dimensions of burnout (cynicism, personal accomplishment, and emotional exhaustion) regardless of the type of work. The aim of this research is to offer evidence on the psychometric properties of the MBI-GS for its use in the Dominican Republic and other Caribbean Spanish-speaking countries, using representative sample of Dominican teachers. The factorial validity was studied through confirmatory factor analysis. Several competing models were proved in order to test the dimensionality of the scale. The confirmatory analyses shown that the original three-factor structure had a superior fit, but item eleven was removed in order to get an excellent fit χ2(87) = 211.19, p < .001, CFI = .98, RMSEA = .038 90% CI [.032–.045]. Regarding internal consistency, the CRI´s are well above the cut-off criteria of .7 (CRI’s ranged from .74 to .86). Concerning criterion-related validity, the three factors were correlated in the expected direction. Professional efficacy, a dimension of burnout measured in the opposite direction, was positively correlated with the three factors of work engagement, also as expected. This version was found to be a psychometrically sound measure of the three core dimensions of burnout.

Keywords

burnout inventorymaslachteachers
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E83
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahola, K., Honkonen, T., Isometsä, E., Kalimo, R., Nykyri, E., Koskinen, S., … Lönnqvist, J. (2006). Burnout in the general population. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 11–17. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0011-5 Google Scholar
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Computing the strictly positive Satorra-Bentler chi-square test in Mplus. Mplus webnotes, n 12. Los Angeles, CA: Statmodel Co.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – general survey: An internet study. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping: An International Journal, 15, 245–260. http://doi.org/10.1080/1061580021000020716 Google Scholar
Borritz, M., Rugulies, R., Bjorner, J. B., Villadsen, E., Mikkelsen, O. A., & Kristensen, T. S. (2006). Burnout among employees in human service work: Design and baseline findings of the PUMA Study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 34, 49–58. http://doi.org/10.1080/14034940510032275 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chirkowska-Smolak, T., & Kleka, P. (2011). The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey: Validation across different occupational groups in Poland. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 42, 86–94. http://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-011-0014-x Google Scholar
Demerouti, E., & Nachreiner, F. (1998). Zur spezifität von Burnout für dienstleistungsberufe: Fakt oder artefakt? [The specificity of burnout in human services: Fact or artifact?]. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 52, 82–89.Google Scholar
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two Burnout instruments. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 12–23.Google Scholar
Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In Hancock, G. R. & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course, (2 nd Ed., pp. 439–492). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for CFA with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.Google Scholar
Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff Burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 159–65.Google Scholar
Gil-Monte, P., & Zúñiga-Caballero, L. (2009). Factorial validity of the “Spanish Burnout Inventory” (SBI) in a sample of Mexican Doctors. Universitas Psychologica, 9, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil-Monte, P. (2002). Validez factorial de la adaptación al español del Maslach Burnout Inventory-general survey [Factorial validity of the Spanish version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-general survey]. Salud Pública de México, 44, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. E., Walkey, F. H., & Taylor, A. J. W. (1991). The three-factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. A multicultural, multinational confirmatory study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 453–472.Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Google Scholar
Jones, J. W. (1980). The Staff Burnout Scale for health professionals (SBS-HP). Park Ridge, IL: London House.Google Scholar
Kitaoka-Higashiguchi, K., Ogino, K., & Masuda, S. (2004). Validation of Japanese research version of Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 75, 415–419. http://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.75.415 Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19, 192–207. http://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720 Google Scholar
Langballe, E. M., Falkum, E., Innstrand, S. T., & Aasland, O. G. (2006). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-general survey in representative samples of eight different occupational groups. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 370–384. http://doi.org/10.1177/1069072706286497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, M. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1996). Consistency of the burnout construct across occupations. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 9, 229–243. http://doi.org/10.1080/10615809608249404 Google Scholar
Malakh-Pines, A., & Aronson, E. (1988). Career Burnout: Causes and cures. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach Burnout inventory manual. (3 th Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout inventory manual. (2 nd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about Burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Millan, A. C., & d’Aubeterre, M. E. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas del Maslach Burnout Inventory-GS en una muestra multiocupacional venezolana [Psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in a multi-occupational Venezolean sample]. Revista de Psicología, 30, 103–128.Google Scholar
Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., & Escobar Redonda, E. (2001). La evaluación del burnout profesional. Factorialización del MBI-GS. Un análisis preliminar [The evaluation of professional burnout. Factor analysis of the MBI-GS. A preliminary analysis]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 7, 69–77.Google Scholar
Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Oramas, A., González, A., & Vergara, A. (2007). El desgaste profesional: Evaluación y factorialización del MBI-GS [The professional fatigue: Assessment and factor analysis]. Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo, 8, 37–45.Google Scholar
Raykov, T. (2004). Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling. Behavioral Therapy, 35, 299–331. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80041-8 Google Scholar
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Llorens, S., Peiró, J. M., & Grau, R. (2000). Desde el “Burnout” al “Engagement”: ¿Una nueva perspectiva? [From “Burnout” to “Engagement: A new perspective?]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 16, 117–134.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2001). Werk en welbevinden: Naar een positieve benadering in de arbeids- en gezondheidspsychologie [Work and well-being: Toward a positive approach in occupational health psychology]. Gedrag & Organisatie, 14, 229–253.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). UWES – Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test manual. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). MBI-General Survey. In Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (Eds.), Maslach Burnout Inventory manual. (3 rd Ed.). Palo Alto, CA. Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464–481. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003 Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.Google Scholar
Schutte, N., Toppinen, S., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2000). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – general survey across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 53–66. http://doi.org/10.1348/096317900166877 Google Scholar
Shirom, A., & Melamed, S. (2006). A comparison of the construct validity of two burnout measures among two groups of professionals. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 176–200.Google Scholar
Taris, T. W., Schreurs, P. J. G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1999). Construct validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-general survey: A two-sample examination of its factor structure and correlates. Work & Stress, 13, 223–237. http://doi.org/10.1080/026783799296039 Google Scholar
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Kantas, A. (2012). Measuring burnout and work engagement: Factor structure, invariance, and latent mean differences across Greece and the Netherlands. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 7, 40–52.Google Scholar