Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:03:54.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Time of Perception and the Other Way Around

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo ,
André M. Cravo  and
Hamilton Haddad
Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo*
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo (Brazil)
André M. Cravo
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo (Brazil)
Hamilton Haddad
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo (Brazil)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo, “Roberto Vieira” Sensory Physiology Lab, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The world we perceive is delayed in relation to its flowing content, as well as the outcome of our actions on the world in relation to the moment we decide to act. This mosaic of different latencies permeating both perception and action has to be taken into account critically in order for us to cope with the temporal challenges constantly imposed by the environment. Fundamental notions, such as the sense of agency and causality, depend on the temporal relationship of events occurring in well-defined windows of time. Here, we offer a broad, yet abridged, historical view of some thought-provoking issues concerning the time of perception and action. From the pioneering work of Wundt, Titchener, and Libet to recent findings and ideas related to the employment of visual illusions as psychophysical probes (such as the flash-lag effect), we have tried to expose some problems inherent to the act of measuring the time of both perception and action, and devise possible solutions as well.

El mundo que percibimos está retardado en relación a su flujo de contenido, al igual que el resultado de nuestras acciones sobre el mundo en relación con el momento en que decidamos actuar. Este mosaico de diferentes latencias que penetra tanto en la percepción como en la acción debe ser tenido en cuenta de forma crítica para poder manejar los retos temporales constantemente impuestos por el entorno. Nociones fundamentales, como el sentido de ser un agente y el de la causalidad, dependen de la relación temporal de los eventos que ocurren en ventanas bien definidas de tiempo. Aquí ofrecemos un panorama histórico extenso pero abreviado de algunas cuestiones provocadoras de la reflexión acerca del tiempo de la percepción y de la acción. Desde los trabajos pioneros de Wundt, Titchener y Libet hasta los descubrimientos recientes y las ideas relacionadas con el empleo de las ilusiones ópticas tales como el efecto “flash-lag”, como sondas psicofísicas, hemos intentado exponer algunos de los problemas inherentes al acto de medir el tiempo, tanto el de la percepción como el de la acción, así como diseñar soluciones posibles.

Keywords

flash-lag effecttime of perceptiontime of actionintentional bindingel efecto flash-lagel tiempo de percepciónel tiempo de acciónligado intencional
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 2007 , pp. 258 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, L.G. (1975). The relationship between judgments of successiveness and judgments of order. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldo, M.V.C., & Caticha, N. (2005). Computational neurobiology of the flash-lag effect. Vision Research, 45, 2620–2630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldo, M.V.C., Kihara, A.H., & Klein, S.A. (2000). Lagging behind because of sensory and attentional delays. [Abstract] Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 41, S420.Google Scholar
Baldo, M.V.C., Kihara, A.H., Namba, J., & Klein, S.A. (2002). Evidence for an attentional component of perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli. Perception, 31, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldo, M.V.C., & Klein, S.A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature, 378, 565–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldo, M.V.C., & Namba, J. (2002). The attentional modulation of the flash-lag effect. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 35, 969–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldo, M.V C., Ranvaud, R.D., & Morya, E. (2002). Flag errors in soccer games: The flash-lag effect brought to real life. Perception, 31, 1205–1210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boring, E.G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. (1981). On the alleged backwards referral of experiences and its relevance to the mind-body problem. Philosophy of Science, 48, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Dennett, D., & Kinsbourne, M. (1992). Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behavioral Brain Science, 15, 183–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durgin, F.H., & Sternberg, S. (2002). The time of consciousness and vice versa. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagleman, D.M. (2001). Visual illusions and neurobiology. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 920–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagleman, D.M., & Holcombe, A.O. (2002). Causality and the perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 323–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagleman, D.M., & Sejnowski, T.J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287, 2036–2038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fröhlich, F.W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 54, 58–78.Google Scholar
Glynn, I.M. (1990). Consciousness and time. Nature, 348, 477–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, G. (1998). The timing of conscious experience: A critical review and reinterpretation of Libet's research. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 559–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes, G. (2002). Problems in the timing of conscious experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, H. Jr., & Baldo, M.V.C. (2005). The interference of action in the flash-lag effect. [Abstracts] Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, 9, 51.Google Scholar
Haddad, H. Jr., Carreiro, L.R.R., & Baldo, M.V.C. (2002). Modulation of perception of temporal order by attentional and pre-attentional factors. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 35, 979–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, H. Jr., Klein, S., & Baldo, M.V.C. (1999). The contribution of attentional and pre-attentional mechanisms to the perception of temporal order. In Taddei-Ferretti, C. & Musio, C. (Eds.), Neuronal bases and psychological aspects of consciousness (pp. 339–342). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, P. (2005). Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 291–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 382–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haggard, P., & Eimer, M. (1999). On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 128–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Jaskowski, P. (1991). Two-stage model for order discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaskowski, P. (1993). Temporal-order judgment and reaction time to stimuli of different rise times. Perception, 22, 963–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, S.A. (2002). Libet's temporal anomalies: A reassessment of the data. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 198–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lappe, M., & Krekelberg, B. (1998). The position of moving objects. Perception, 27, 1437–1449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, B. (2002). The timing of mental events: Libet's experimental findings and their implications. Consciousness and Cognition 11, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libet, B. (2004). Mind time: The temporal factor in consciousness. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W. Jr, & Pearl, D.K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential): The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106, 623–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libet, B., Wright, E.W., Feinstein, B., & Pearl, D.K. (1979). Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience: A functional role for the somatosensory specific projection system in man. Brain, 102, 193–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Moliner, J., & Linares, D. (2005). Internal and external prediction in the flash-lag effect. [Abstracts] Vision Sciences Society 5th Annual Meeting, 56.Google Scholar
Lopez-Moliner, J., & Linares, D. (2006). The flash-lag effect is reduced when the flash is perceived as a sensory consequence of our action. Vision Research, 46, 2122–2129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackay, D.M. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature, 181, 507–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, J.J., Teder-Sälejärvi, A.T., Russo, F.D., & Hillyard, S.A. (2005). Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1197–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzger, W. (1931). Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit. Psychologische Forschung, 16, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namba, J., & Baldo, M.V.C. (2004). The modulation of the flash-lag effect by voluntary attention. Perception, 34, 621–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijhawan, R. (1992). Misalignment of contours through the interaction of apparent and real motion systems. [Abstract] Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 33, 1415.Google Scholar
Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature, 370, 256–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijhawan, R., & Khurana, B. (2000). Conscious registration of continuous and discrete visual events. In Metzinger, T. (Ed.), Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions (pp. 203–219). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. (1989). The emperor's new mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocket, S. (2002). On subjective back-referral and how long it takes to become conscious of a stimulus: A reinterpretation of Libet's data. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöppel, E. (1997). A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 56–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K.R. & Eccles, J.C. (1983). The self and its brain. London: Routlege.Google Scholar
Purushothaman, G., Patel, S.S., Bedell, H.E., & Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature, 396, 424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (2002). Through the eye, slowly: Delays and localization errors in the visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidgen, H. (2003). Time and noise: The stable surroundings of reaction experiments, 1860–1890. Studies in history and philosophy of science Part C: Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, 34, 237–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidgen, H. (2005). Physics, ballistics, and psychology: A history of the chronoscope in/as context, 1845–1890. History of Psychology, 8, 46–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, C., Shore, D.I., & Klein, R.M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 799–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, R.W. (1950). Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 43, 482–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelmach, L.B., & Herdman, C. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539–550.Google ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, S., Knoll, R.L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In Kornblum, S. (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Titchener, E.B. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of felling and attention. New York: Macmillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, R. (1987). Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 224–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Grind, W. (2002). Physical, neural, and mental timing. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, B. (2004). Neural mechanisms for prediction: Do insects have forward models? Trends in Neuroscience, 27, 278–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, D. (2002). The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 656–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D.M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed