Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:29:40.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Taxonomy of the Psychosocial Consequences Caused by the Violence of Persecution of ETA's Network

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Javier Martin-Peña*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona. (Spain)
Álvaro Rodríguez-Carballerira
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona. (Spain)
Jordi Escartín
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona. (Spain)
Clara Porrúa
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona. (Spain)
Miranda Olff
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam. (The Netherlands)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Javier Martin-Peña. Departamento de Psicología Social. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Barcelona. Mundet. Passeig de la Vall de Hebron, 171. 08035 Barcelona. (Spain). Fax: +34-934021366. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper delimits and analyzes the effects of the harassment perpetrated by ETA's terrorist network in the Basque Country. The aim was to provide a taxonomy of the consequences of psychological violence and to validate this taxonomy, by means of a content analysis of 37 testimonies of victims of terrorist violence. The taxonomy of consequences of psychological violence is made up by four components: 1. the effects on the context of the persons affected, 2. on their emotional state, 3. on cognition and 4. on behavior. Results show a predominance of contextual consequences and negative cognitions. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability analysis showed high stability and reproducibility coefficients. This study shows that harassment and psychological violence have major consequences not only for victims but also for family members, threatened collectives and even the society as a whole.

Este estudio delimita y analiza los efectos del acoso aplicado por el entramado terrorista de ETA en el País Vasco. El objetivo consiste en aportar una taxonomía de las consecuencias de la violencia psicológica y validar esta taxonomía, mediante un análisis de contenido de 37 testimonios de víctimas de la violencia terrorista. La taxonomía de consecuencias de la violencia psicológica se encuentra formada por cuatro componentes: 1. los efectos sobre el contexto de las personas afectadas, 2. sobre su estado emocional, 3. sobre la cognición y 4. sobre la conducta. Los resultados muestran una predominancia de las consecuencias contextuales y las cogniciones negativas. El análisis de la fiabilidad intraobservador e interobservador muestra unos adecuados coeficientes de estabilidad y reproducibilidad. Este estudio muestra que el acoso y la violencia psicológica tienen grandes consecuencias no solo para las víctimas sino para los familiares, los colectivos amenazados y para el conjunto de la sociedad.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, R., & Reinares, F. (2005). Terrorism, human rights and law enforcement in Spain. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17, 265278. doi:10.1080/09546550490520727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ararteko, (2009a). Atención institucional a las víctimas del terrorismo en Euskadi [Institutional attention to victims of terrorism in the Basque Country]. Retrieved from http://www.ararteko.net.Google Scholar
Ararteko, (2009b). Informe al Parlamento Vasco 2008 [2008 Report to the Basque Parliament]. Retrieved from http://www.ararteko.net.Google Scholar
Baca, E., Echeburúa, E., & Tamarit, J. M. (2006). Manual de victimología [Handbook of victimology]. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanc.Google Scholar
Baca, E., & Cabanas, M. L. (2003). Las víctimas de la violencia. Estudios psicopatológicos [The victims of violence. Psychopathological studies]. Madrid: TriacastelaGoogle Scholar
Baca, E., Cabanas, M. L., & Baca-García, E. (2002). Impacto de los atentados terroristas en la morbilidad psiquiátrica a corto y largo plazo [Terrorist attacks and short-long time psychiatric morbidity]. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 30(2), 8590.Google Scholar
Baca, E., Cabanas, M. L., Pérez-Rodríguez, M. M., & BacaGarcía, E. (2004). Trastornos mentales en las víctimas de atentados terroristas y sus familiares [Mental disorders in victims of terrorism and their families]. Medicina Clínica, 122,18, 681685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, C. P., Caporale, C. M., & Gil-Arana, L. A. (2009). Basque Terrorism: Police Action, Political Measures and the Influence of Violence on the Stock Market in the Basque Country. Defence & Peace Economics, 20(4), 287301. doi:10.1080/10242690701750676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolomé-Gutierrez, R., & Rechea-Alberola, R. (2006). Violent youth groups in Spain. Young, 14(4), 323342. doi:10.1177/1103308806068547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danieli, Y., Brom, D., & Sills, J. (2004). The trauma of terrorism. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 9(1), 117. doi:10.1300/J146v09n01_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Calle, L. (2007). Fighting for local control: Street violence in the Basque Country. International Studies Quarterly, 51(2),431455. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00458.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Calle, L., & Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2004). La selección de víctimas en ETA [Target selection of ETA's victims]. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 10, 5379.Google Scholar
De Jong, J. T. P., Komproe, I. H., Spinazzola, J., Van der Kolk, B. A., & Ommeren, M. (2005). DESNOS in three postconflict settings: Assessing cross-cultural construct equivalence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(1), 1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echeburúa, E., de Corral, P., & Amor, P. J. (2002). Evaluación del daño psicológico en víctimas de delitos violentos [Evaluation of psychological harm in the victims of violent crime]. Psicothema, 14, 139146.Google Scholar
Echeburúa, E. (2004). Superar un trauma. Tratamiento de las víctimas de sucesos violentos [Overcome a trauma. Treatment of violence victims]. Madrid: Pirámide.Google Scholar
Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Zapf, D., Porrúa, C., & Martín-Peña, J. (2009). Perceived severity of various bullying behaviors at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying. Work and Stress, 23(3), 191205. doi:10.1080/02678370903289639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escartín, J., Zapf, D., Arrieta, C., & Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. (2011). Workers' perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. First published on: 07 July 2010 (iFirst). doi:10.1080/13594320903395652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, D. (1975). The Strategy of Terrorism. Foreign Affairs, 53(4), 683698. doi:10.2307/20039540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funes, M. (1998). Social responses to political violence in the Basque Country. Peace movements and their audience. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(4), 493510. doi:10.1177/0022002798042004005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersons, B. P.R., & Olff, M. (2005). Coping with the aftermath of trauma. British Medical Journal, 330, 10381039. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gesto por la Paz (2000). Ante la violencia de persecución [Faced with violence of persecution]. Retrieved from http://www.gesto.org/violenciapersecucion.htm.Google Scholar
Herman, J. L. (1992). Complex PTSD: A syndrome of survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5, 377391. doi:10.1002/jts.2490050305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Imbusch, P. (2003). The concept of violence. In Heitmeyer, W., & Hagan, J. (Eds.), International handbook of violence research (pp. 1339). Dordrecht/Boston/Londres: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larizgoitia, I., Izarzugaza, I., & Markez, I. (2009). La noche de las víctimas [The night of the victims]. Vitoria: Fundación Fernando Buesa Blanco.Google Scholar
Letschert, R., Staiger, I., & Pemberton, A. (2009). Assisting victims of terrorism: Towards a European standard for justice. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3025-2_6Google Scholar
Llera, F. J., & Retortillo, A. (2005). Los Españoles y las víctimas del terrorismo [The Spaniards and victims of terrorism]. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Escartín, J., Porrúa, C., & Winkel, F. W. (2010). Strategies of psychological terrorism perpetrated by ETA's network: delimitation and classification. Psicothema, 22(1), 112117.Google Scholar
Matt, G. E., & Vázquez, C. (2008). Anxiety, depressed mood, self-esteem, and traumatic stress symptoms among distant witnesses of the 9/11 terrorist attacks: Transitory responses and psychological resilience. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 503515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386.Google Scholar
Nijdam, M. J., Olff, M., de Vries, M., Martens, W. J., & Gersons, B. P. R. (2008). Psychosocial effects of threat and protection. Amsterdam: National Coordinator for Counterterrorism. Retrieved from http://english.nctb.nl/Google Scholar
Olff, M., Langeland, W., & Gersons, B. P. R. (2005). The psychobiology of PTSD: coping with trauma. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 457467. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, D. (2002). Political violence, ethnic conflict, and contemporary wars: broad implications for health and social well-being. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 175190. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00261-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penrod, J., Preston, D. B., Cain, R. E., & Starks, M. T. (2003). A discussion of chain referral as a method of sampling hard-to-reach populations. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14, 100107. doi:10.1177/1043659602250614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, R. (2004). Violencia de persecución en el País Vasco [Violence of persecution in the Basque Country]. Perspectivas Sistémicas, 81. Retrieved from http://www.redsistemica.com.ar/pereira.htm.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Escartín, J., Visauta, B., Porrúa, C., & Martín-Peña, J. (2010). Categorization and hierarchy of workplace bullying strategies: A Delphi survey. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 297308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., & Javaloy, F. (2005). Psychosocial Analysis of the collective processes in the United States after September 11. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22, 201216. doi:10.1080/07388940500200716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2009). Analyzing temporal variation in the lethality of ETA. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 67(3),609629. doi:10.3989/ris.2008.03.24Google Scholar
Schmid, A. (2004). Frameworks for conceptualising terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16(3), 197221. doi:10.1080/09546550490483134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzberg, B. H. (2002). The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3(4), 261288. doi:10.1177/1524838002237330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859883. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, J.B. (2003 September). Strategies for countering terrorism: Lessons from the Israeli experience. Journal of Homeland Security. Retrieved from http://www.homelanddefense.org/journal/Articles/tucker-israel.html.Google Scholar
Van den Broek, H. (2004). BORROKA - The legitimation of street violence in the political discourse of radical basque nationalists. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16(4), 714736. doi:10.1080/095465590885141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkel, F.W. (2007). Post traumatic anger. Missing link in the wheel of misfortune. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar