Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:28:02.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Comparison and Perceived Breach of Psychological Contract: Their Effects on Burnout in a Multigroup Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Gabriela Topa Cantisano*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
J. Francisco Morales Domínguez
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
J. Luis Caeiro García
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Gabriela Topa Cantisano, UNED, c/ Juan del Rosal, 10 Despacho 1.53. 28040. Madrid (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study focuses on the mediator role of social comparison in the relationship between perceived breach of psychological contract and burnout. A previous model showing the hypothesized effects of perceived breach on burnout, both direct and mediated, is proposed. The final model reached an optimal fit to the data and was confirmed through multigroup analysis using a sample of Spanish teachers (N = 401) belonging to preprimary, primary, and secondary schools. Multigroup analyses showed that the model fit all groups adequately.

Este estudio se centra en el papel de la comparación social en la relación entre la ruptura percibida del contrato psicológico y el burnout. Se propone un modelo previo mostrando los efectos hipotetizados, tanto directos como mediados, de la ruptura percibida sobre el burnout. El modelo final alcanzó un ajuste óptimo a los datos y se confirmó a través del análisis multigrupo usando una muestra de profesores españoles (N = 401) pertenecientes a escuelas infantiles, primarias y secundarias. Los análisis multigrupo mostraron que el modelo se ajusta adecuadamente a todos los grupos.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennenbroek, F.T.C., Buunk, B.P., van der Zee, K.I., & Grol, B. (2002). Social comparison and patient information: What do cancer patients want? Patient Education & Counseling, 47, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenninkmeijer, V., Vanyperen, N.W., & Buunk, B.P. (2000). I am not a better teacher, but others are doing worse: Burnout and perceptions of superiority among teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 259274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B.P., & Ybema, J.F. (1997). Social comparisons and occupational stress: The identification-contrast model. In Buunk, B.P. & Gibbons, F.X. (Eds.), Health, coping, and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 359388). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Buunk, B.P., & Ybema, J.F. (2003). Feeling bad, but satisfied: The effects of upward and downward comparison upon mood and marital satisfaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 613628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buunk, B.P., Ybema, J.F., Gibbons, F.X., & Ipenburg, M. (2001). The affective consequences of social comparison as related to professional burnout and social comparison orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 337351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B.P., Ybema, J.F., Van der Zee, K., Schaufeli, W.B., & Gibbons, F.X. (2001). Affect generated by social comparisons among nurses high and low in burnout. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 15001520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B.P., Zurriaga, R., González-Roma, V., & Subirats, M. (2003). Engaging in upward and downward comparisons as a determinant of relative deprivation at work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 370388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. (1999). The nomological network of teacher burnout: A literature review and empirically validated model. In Huberman, R V.M. (Ed.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout (pp. 1537. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1, 5586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, I., & Farber, B. (1992). Professional self-concept as a predictor of teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 2835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gakovic, A., & Tetrick, L.E. (2003). Psychological contract breach as a source of strain for employees. Journal of Business & Psychology, 18, 235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, F.X., & Gerrard, M. (1991). Downward comparison and coping with threat. In Wills, J.S.T. (Ed.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 316346.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hogg, M.A. (2000). Social identity and social comparison. In Wheeler, J.S.L. (Ed.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 401421). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, M. (1999). Burnout among teachers as a crisis in psychological contracts. In Vandenberghe, R. & Huberman, A. (Ed.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout. (pp. 202210). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S.E., 1981. The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison Wolfe, E., & Robinson, S. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violations develop. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 576599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S., & Morrison, E.W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 525546.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Understanding written and unwritten agreements. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. (2004). Psychological contracts: Understanding the ties that motivate. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 120127.Google Scholar
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Llorens, S., Peiró, J., & Grau, R. (2000). Desde el burnout al engagement. ¿Una nueva perspectiva? Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las organizaciones, 16, 117134.Google Scholar
Tennen, H., McKee, T.E., & Affleck, G. (2000). Social comparison processes in health and illness. In Suls, J. & Wheeler, L. (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 443483). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topa, G., Fernández, I., & Lisbona, A. (2005). Ruptura de contrato psicológico y burnout en Equipos de intervención en emergencias y catástrofes. Ansiedad y Estrés, 11, 265279.Google Scholar
Topa, G., & Morales, F. (2005). Determinantes específicos de la satisfacción laboral, el burnout y sus consecuencias para la salud: Un estudio exploratorio con funcionarios de prisiones. (Specific determinants of work satisfaction, burnout and health consequences: An exploratory study among prison officers) International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 5, 7181.Google Scholar
Topa, G., & Palací, F. (2004). ¿Ruptura o cumplimiento del contrato psicológico? Una revisión meta-analítica de la investigación empírica. Acción Psicológica, 3, 155171.Google Scholar
Van der Zee, K., Buunk, B.P., Sanderman, R., Botke, G., & van den Bergh, F. (2000). Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Zee, K., Oldersma, F., Buunk, B.P., & Bos, D. (1998). Social Comparison preferences among cancer patients as related to neuroticism and social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 801810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed