Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:03:18.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representations and Antinomies: Rural and City Social Objects in a Brazilian Peasant Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2013

Mariana Bonomo ,
Lídio de Souza ,
Zeidi Araujo Trindade  and
Maria Cristina Smith Menandro
Mariana Bonomo*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (Brazil)
Lídio de Souza
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (Brazil)
Zeidi Araujo Trindade
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (Brazil)
Maria Cristina Smith Menandro
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (Brazil)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mariana Bonomo. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia. Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Av. Fernando Ferrari, No. 514. Campus Universitário Goiabeiras –Vitória, Espírito Santo (Brazil). Cep: 29075-910. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present work is part of a series of studies that primarily focus on social representations of rural and city objects in the process of constructing a social identity of the countryside. Using social representation theory, this study aimed to investigate the representational field linked to the rural and city objects for the members of a peasant community. A total of 200 members of a Brazilian rural community from four generational groups, of both sexes and aged between 7 and 81 years, participated in this study. We conducted individual interviews with semi-structured scripts. The data corpora, processed using EVOC software, consisted of free associations of the rural and city inductor terms. In constitutive terms, the results allow for the identification of antinomies between the objects discussed; in functional terms, they indicate that the process of constructing social identity is based on the symbolic field, which acts as a reference system for the preparation of the rural identity shared by the participants.

Keywords

citystructural approachsocial representationruralityBrazil
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 16 , 2013 , E70
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovay, R. (2003). O futuro das regiões rurais [The future of rural áreas] . Porto Alegre, Brazil: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C. (1997). Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques [Social representations: Theoretical aspects]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations [Social practices and representations] (pp. 11–36). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C. (2001). O estudo experimental das representações sociais [The experimental study of social representations]. In Jodelet, D. (Org.), As representações sociais [Social representations] (pp. 155–171). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: EDUERJ.Google Scholar
Abric, J. C. (2003a). De l’importance des représentations sociales dans les problèmes de l’exclusion sociale [The importance of social representations in problems of social exclusion]. In Abric, J. C. (Ed.), Exclusion sociale, insertion et prévention [Social exclusion, inclusion and prevention] (pp. 13–19). Ramonville Saint-Agne, France: érès.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abric, J. C. (2003b). L’analyse structurale des representations socials [Structural analysis of social representations]. In Moscovici, S. & Buschini, F. (Orgs.), Les méthodes des sciences humaines [Methods in the humanities sciences] (pp. 375–392). Paris, France: Puf Fondamental.Google Scholar
Ajcardi, R., & Therme, P. (2007). Représentation sociale d’un sport à risques en fonction de la pratique et de la modalidté de pratique: L’exemple du ski extrême [Social representation of sport risks according to the practice and the practice modality: The extreme skiing case]. Papers on Social Representations, 16, 1–20.Google Scholar
Albuquerque, F. J. B. (2002). Psicologia social e formas de vida rural no Brasil [Social psychology and rural life in Brazil] Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 18, 37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722002000100005 Google Scholar
Aleixo, A. C. V. (2004). A imagem literária de um sertão chamado Brasil [The literary image of a sertão called Brazil]. Revista da UFG, 7(01). Retrieved from http://www.proec.ufg.br/revista_ufg/agro/V11_imagem.html Google Scholar
Anjos, F. S., & Caldas, N. V. (2005). O futuro ameaçado: O mundo rural face aos desafios da masculinização, do envelhecimento e da desagrarização [The future threatened: The rural word face the challenges of masculinization, aging and agrarian decline]. Ensaios FEE, 26, 661–694. Retrieved from http://revistas.fee.tche.br/index.php/ensaios/article/view/2097/2479 Google Scholar
Arcuri, L., & Cadinu, M. R. (1998). Gli stereotipi [Stereotypes] . Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Barbosa, M. A. (2004). Antonímia: A dialética entre os contrários e os contraditórios [Antonymy: The dialectic between opposites and contradictory]. Revista Philologus, 10(28), 58–72.Google Scholar
Bardin, L. (2002). Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis] . Lisboa, Portugal: Edições 70.Google Scholar
Bardin, L. (2003). L’analyse de contenu et de la forme des communications [Content analysis and communication forms]. In Moscovici, S. & Buschini, F. (Orgs.), Les méthodes des sciences humaines [Methods in the humanities sciences] (pp. 243–270). Paris, France: Puf Fondamental.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (2006). Elementos de semiologia [Elements of semiology] . São Paulo, Brazil: Cultrix.Google Scholar
Bell, M. M., Lloyd, S. E., & Vatovec, C. (2010). Activating the countryside: Rural power, the power of the rural and the making of rural politics. Sociologia Ruralis, 50, 205–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00512.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. M., & Osti, G. (2010). Mobilities and ruralities: An introduction. Sociologia Ruralis, 50, 199–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00518.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardelli, M. L. F. H. (2006). Contribuições ao debate sobre o urbano e o rural [Contributions to the urban-rural debate]. In Sposito, M. E. B. & Whitacker, A. M. (Orgs.), Cidade e campo: Relações e contradições entre urbano e rural [City and country: Relations and contradictions between urban and rural] . (pp. 33–-52). São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Expressão Popular.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1997). Psicologia sociale del pregiudizio [Social psychology of prejudice] . Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2000). Psicologia sociale dei gruppi [The social psychology of groups] . Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Brumer, A., & Anjos, G. (2008). Gênero e reprodução social na agricultura familiar [Gender and social reproduction in family farm]. Revista NERA, 12, 6–17.Google Scholar
Cabecinhas, R. (2006). Identidade e memória social: Estudos comparativos em Portugal e em Timor-Leste [Identity and social memory: Comparative studies in Portugal and East-Timor]. In Martins, M., Sousa, H. & Cabecinhas, R. (Eds.), Comunicação e Lusofonia: Para uma abordagem crítica da cultura e dos media [Communication and Lusophony: For a critical approach to culture and media] (pp. 183–214). Porto, Portugal: Campo das Letras.Google Scholar
Caiado, A. S. C., & Santos, S. M. M. (2004, September). Urbano ou rural? Um olhar sobre processos sócio-espaciais em curso no Estado de São Paulo [Urban or rural? An overview of current socio-spatial processes in the São Paulo state] . Paper presented at the XIV National Meeting of Population Studies – ABEP. Minas Gerais, Brazil.Google Scholar
Caliari, R. O. (2002). Pedagogia da alternância e desenvolvimento local [Pedagogy of alternation and local development] . Lavras, Brazil: UFLA.Google Scholar
Camarero, L., & Sampedro, R. (2008). ¿Por qué se van las mujeres? El continuum de movilidad como hipótesis explicativa de la masculinización rural [Why are women leaving? The mobility continuum as an explanation of rural masculinization process]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Reis), 124, 73–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40184907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, B., & Wachelke, J. F. R. (2010). The study of social representation systems: Relationships involving representations on aging, AIDS and the body. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 1–21.Google Scholar
Coelho, B. J. (2006). Antônimos –mais do que palavras de sentidos contrários [Antonyms – more than words of opposite senses]. Linguagem - Estudos e Pesquisas, 8-9, 42–83.Google Scholar
Dedej, A. (2005). La rappresentazione sociale della donna musulmana in alcuni quotidiani della stampa italiana [Social representation of the muslim women in italian press] . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Genova, Italy.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1989). Livelli di spiegazione in psicologia sociale [Levels of explanation in social psychology] . Milano, Italy: Giuffrè editore.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (2002). La forza delle idee [The power of ideas] . Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Endlich, A. M. (2006). Perspectivas sobre o urbano e o rural [Urban and rural perspectives]. In Sposito, M. E. B. & Whitacker, A. M. (Orgs.), Cidade e campo: Relações e contradições entre urbano e rural [City and country: Urban-rural relations and contradictions] . (pp. 11–32). São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Expressão Popular.Google Scholar
Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P. (2008). Challenges and opportunities for african agriculture and food security. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved from http://agecon.ucdavis.edu/research/seminars/files/challenges-and-opportunities-for-african-agriculture-and-food-security.pdf Google Scholar
Guimelli, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (2004). Étude structurale de la relation d’antonymie entre deux objets de représentation sociale: La sécurité vs l’insécurité [Structural study of the antinomy relation between two objects of social representation: Security vs. insecurity]. Psychologie & Société, 7, 71–87.Google Scholar
Halfacree, K. (2011). Heterolocal Identities? Counter-urbanisation, second homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, Space and Place, 18, 209–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp.665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2001). As representações sociais: Um domínio em expansão [Social representations: An expanding domain]. In Jodelet, D., As representações sociais [Social representations] . Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: EDUERJ.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2005). Loucuras e representações sociais [Madness and social representations] . Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.Google Scholar
Jodelet, J. (2009). O movimento de retorno ao sujeito e a abordagem das representações sociais [The return to the notion of subject and the approach of social representations]. Sociedade & Estado, 24, 679–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (2004). Psicologia social, saber, comunidade e cultura [Social psychology: Knowledge, community and culture]. Psicologia & Sociedade, 16, 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822004000200004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (2008). Os contextos do saber –Representações, comunidade e cultura [Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture] . Petrópolis, Brazil: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
Kayser, B. (1990). La renaissance rurale. Sociologie des campagnes du monde occidental. [The rural renaissance. Sociology of campaigns in the western world] . Paris, France: Armand Colin (Orig. 1972).Google Scholar
Larrabure, S. P. (2009). O fenômeno da segunda residência: O caso do Rio Grande entre os estados de São Paulo e Minas Gerais [The second home phenomenon: The Rio Grande case between São Paulo and Minas Gerais states]. GEOUSP - Espaço e Tempo, special edition, 93–105.Google Scholar
Lastarria-Cornhiel, S. (2006). Feminization of agriculture: Trends and driving forces. Ottawa, Canada: Rimisp-Latin American Center for Rural Development. Retrieved from http://www.rimisp.org/getdoc.php?docid=6489 Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1975). De lo rural a lo urbano [From rural to urban] . Barcelona, Spain: Península.Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2011). Hegemonic and polemical beliefs: Culture and consumption in the social representation of wine. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 237–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.21 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mainwaring, S. (2004). A igreja católica e a política no Brasil [The Catholic Church and politics in Brazil] . São Paulo, Brazil: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Mantovani, G. (2003). I metodi qualitativi in psicologia –Strumenti per una ricerca situata [Qualitative methods in psychology –Situated Research Tools]. In Mantovani, G. & Spagnolli, A. (Orgs.), Metodi qualitativi in psicologia [Qualitative methods in psychology] (pp. 15–45). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2006). Dialogicidade e representações sociais –As dinâmicas da mente [Dialogicity and social representations – The dynamics of mind] . Petrópolis, Brazil: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
Mazzara, B. M. (1997). Stereotipi e pregiudizi [Stereotypes and prejudices] . Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Melista, A., & Madoglou, A. (2008). Les représentations sociales de la patrie [Social representations of homeland]. Papers on Social Representations, 17, 1–16.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (2008). Représentations sociales et iconographie [Social representations and iconography]. Communication et Organisation, 34, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, J. D., & Moons, T. (2002). Representaciones sociales, identidad y cambio [Social representations, identity and change]. Redes, 10, 51–69.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2003). Representações sociais: Investigações em psicologia social [Social representations: Studies in social psychology] . Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.Google Scholar
Nayenga, R. N. (2008). Gender dynamics in agriculture in Uganda: What are the key policy considerations? Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development of Uganda.Google Scholar
Nosella, P. (2007). Origens da pedagogia da alternância [Origins of the pedagogy of alternation] . Brasília, Brazil: UNEFAB.Google Scholar
Nuvola, F. (2005). Quando l’altro è uno straniero -Stereotipi e pregiudizi nella cultura giovanile [When the other is a foreigner –Stereotypes and prejudices in the youth culture] . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Perugia, Italy.Google Scholar
Oliva, J. (2010). Rural melting-pots, mobilities and fragilities: Reflections on the spanish case. Sociologia Ruralis, 50, 277–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00516.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, D. C., Fischer, F. M., Amaral, M. A., Teixeira, M. C. T. V., & Sá, C. P. (2005). A positividade e a negatividade do trabalho nas representações sociais de adolescentes [Positivity and negativity of the work in adolescents’ social representations]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 18, 125–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722005000100017 Google Scholar
Oliveira, L. L. (2003). Do caipira picando fumo a Chitãozinho e Xororó, ou da roça ao rodeio [From “caipira picando fumo” to “Chitãozinho and Xororó”, or from farm plot to rodeo]. Revista USP, 59, 232–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osti, G. (2010). Mobility demands and participation in remote rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis, 50, 296–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00517.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecora, A. R., & Sá, C.P. (2008). Memórias e representações sociais da cidade de Cuiabá, ao longo de três gerações [Memories and social representations of Cuiabá along three generations]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 21, 319–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722008000200018 Google Scholar
Permanadeli, R. (2011). O pensamento social e a produção de conhecimento local [Social thinking and production of local knowledge]. In Almeida, A. M. O., Santos, M. F. S., & Trindade, Z. A. (Orgs.), Teoria das representações sociais –50 anos [Social representations theory – 50 years] (pp. 563–579). Brasília, Brazil: Technopolitik.Google Scholar
Rye, J. F. (2011). Conflicts and contestations. Rural populations’ perspectives on the second homes phenomenon. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 263–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sá, C. P. (1996a). Núcleo central das representações sociais [Core of social representations] . Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.Google Scholar
Sá, C. P. (1996b). The central nucleus approach to social representations. LSE Methodology Institute and Department of Social Psychology. Londres, UK: LSE. Retrieved from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/methodologyInstitute/pdf/QualPapers/CELSO-Core-periphery.pdf Google Scholar
Sá, C. P., Oliveira, D. C., Castro, R. V., Vetere, R., & Carvalho, R. V. C. (2009). A memória histórica do regime militar ao longo de três gerações no Rio de Janeiro: Sua estrutura representacional [Historical memories of the Brazilian military regime in Rio de Janeiro across three generations: A representational structure]. Estudos de Psicologia, 26, 159–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2009000200004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santaella, L. (2004). A teoria geral dos signos: Como as linguagens significam as coisas [The general theory of signs: How languages mean things] . São Paulo, Brazil: Pioneira Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Silva, J. G. (2001). Velhos e novos mitos do rural brasileiro [Old and new myths about rural Brazil]. Estudos Avançados, 15(43), 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142001000300005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, L. (2004). Processos de categorização e identidade: Solidariedade, exclusão e violência [Categorization processes and identity: Solidarity, exclusion and violence]. In Souza, L. & Trindade, Z. A. (Orgs.), Violência e exclusão: Convivendo com paradoxos [Violence and exclusion: Living with paradoxes] (pp. 57–74). São Paulo, Brazil: Casa do Psicólogo.Google Scholar
Toledo, V. M., Alarcón-Cháires, P., & Barón, L. (2009). Revisualizar lo rural desde una perspectiva multidisciplinaria [Revisualizing the rural scenario from a multidisciplinary perspective]. Polis, Revista de la Universidad Bolivariana, 8, 328–345.Google Scholar
Trindade, Z. A., Santos, M. F. S., & Almeida, A. M. O. (2000, May). Psicologia popular, práticas e representações sociais [Popular psychology, practices and social representations] . Paper presented at the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Research and Scientific Exchange in Psychology –ANPEPP. Serra Negra, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Veiga, J. E. (2004). Destinos da ruralidade no processo de globalização [Rurality destinations in the globalization process]. Estudos Avançados, 18(51), 51–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142004000200003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga, J. E. (2006). Nascimento de outra ruralidade [The birth of another rurality]. Estudos Avançados, 20, 333–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142006000200023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergès, P. (2000). EVOC –Ensemble de Programmes permettant l’analyse des évocations: manual version 2 [Programs for the analysis of evocations, users manual] . Aix-en-Provence, France: LAMES.Google Scholar
Wachelke, J. F. R. (2009). Índice de centralidade de representações sociais a partir de evocações (INCEV): Exemplo de aplicação no estudo da representação social sobre envelhecimento [Social representations centrality index from evocations (INCEV): An example of application on the study of the social representation on aging]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 22, 102–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722009000100014 Google Scholar
Wanderley, M. N. B. (2000). A emergência de uma nova ruralidade nas sociedades modernas avançadas - O “rural” como espaço singular e “ator coletivo” [The emergence of a new rurality in modern societies advanced –The “rural” as a singular space and “collective actor”]. Estudos, Sociedade e Agricultura, 15, 69–129.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1990). O campo e a cidade [The country and the city] . São Paulo, Brazil: Cia. das Letras.Google Scholar