Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:47:08.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting Organizational Citizenship Behavior from The Functional Analysis and Role Identity Perspectives: Further Evidence in Spanish Employees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Mª Celeste Dávila  and
Marcia A. Finkelstein
Mª Celeste Dávila*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Marcia A. Finkelstein
Affiliation:
University of South Florida (USA)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ma Celeste Dávila de León. Departamento de Psicología Social. Facultad de CC. Políticas y Sociología. Universidad Complutense. Campus de Somosaguas, s/n. 28223 Madrid. Phone: +34-913942766. Fax: +34-913943029. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is a prosocial activity with similarities to volunteerism. The purpose of this work is to contribute new evidence about the relevance to OCB of two models of sustained volunteerism, functional analysis and role identity theory. A total of 983 Spanish employees at 49 organizations completed surveys measuring amount of OCB, motives for engaging in citizenship behavior, and the degree to which respondents developed an organizational citizen role identity. The results showed that both motives and role identity were significant predictors of OCB, with motive partially mediating the role identity-OCB relationship. The findings suggest that similar mechanisms are involved in sustaining volunteerism and OCB.

El comportamiento ciudadano organizacional es una conducta prosocial que presenta algunas similitudes con el voluntariado. El objetivo del presente estudio es aportar nueva evidencia empírica sobre la importancia del enfoque funcional y el modelo de la identidad de rol, dos modelos del voluntariado sostenido, para explicar este tipo de comportamiento. Un total de 983 trabajadores españoles cumplimentaron un cuestionario que evaluaba la frecuencia de estos comportamientos, los motivos para ponerlos en práctica y el grado en el que habían desarrollado una identidad de ciudadano organizacional. Los resultados hallados muestran que tanto los motivos como la identidad de rol son predictores significativos del comportamiento ciudadano organizacional, y que los motivos ejercen una mediación parcial de la relación existente entre la identidad de rol y este tipo de comportamiento. Estos hallazgos sugieren que mecanismos similares permiten explicar el voluntariado sostenido y el comportamiento ciudadano organizacional.

Keywords

prosocial behaviorrole identitymotivesorganizational citizenship behaviorconducta prosocialidentidad de rolmotivoscomportamiento ciudadano organizacional
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 277 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic y statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt, N. y Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borman, W. C., & Penner, L. A. (2001). Citizenship performance: Its nature, antecedents, and motives. In Roberts, B. W. & Hogan, R. (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 45–61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality Predictors of Citizenship Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callero, P., Howard, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (1987). Helping behavior as role behavior: disclosing social structure and history in the analysis of prosocial action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(3), 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, M. A. (2006). Dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: motives, motive fulfillment and role identity. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(6), 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, M. A. (2008). Predictors of volunteer time: The changing contributions of motive fulfillment and role identity. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, M. A.& Penner, L. A. (2004). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior: integrating the functional and role identity approaches. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(4), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. M.& Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grube, J., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer experiences. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1108–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omar, A., & Uribe, H. (2005). Las dimensiones de personalidad como predictores de los comportamientos de ciudadanía organizacional. Estudios de Psicología, 10(2), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, L. A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: an interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piliavin, J. A., Grube, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (2002). Role as resource for action in public service. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: a motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stukas, A. A., Snyder, M., & Clary, E. G. (1999). The effects of “mandatory volunteerism” on intentions to volunteer. Psychological Science, 10, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge of muddied waters). Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215–285.Google Scholar