Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:06:55.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multilevel Models in the Explanation of the Relationship between Safety Climate and Safe Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2013

Alistair Cheyne ,
José M. Tomás  and
Amparo Oliver
Alistair Cheyne*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University (UK)
José M. Tomás
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
Amparo Oliver
Affiliation:
Universitat de València (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Alistair Cheyne. School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, (UK). Phone: +44-1509222162. Fax: +44-1509223961. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between components of organizational safety climate, including employee attitudes to organizational safety issues; perceptions of the physical working environment, and evaluations of worker engagement with safety issues; and relates these to self-reported levels of safety behavior. It attempts to explore the relationships between these variables in 1189 workers across 78 work groups in a large transportation organization. Evaluations of safety climate, the working environment and worker engagement, as well as safe behaviors, were collected using a self report questionnaire. The multilevel analysis showed that both levels of evaluation (the work group and the individual), and some cross-level interactions, were significant in explaining safe behaviors. Analyses revealed that a number of variables, at both levels, were associated with worker engagement and safe behaviors. The results suggest that, while individual evaluations of safety issues are important, there is also a role for the fostering of collective safety climates in encouraging safe behaviors and therefore reducing accidents.

Keywords

safety climatesafe behaviormultilevel analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 16 , 2013 , E54
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research in this paper is partially funded by a grant from the Gobierno de España (project PSI2010-21334).

References

Barcikowski, R. S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 267–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1164877 Google Scholar
Bickle, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Wilford Press.Google Scholar
Cheyne, A., Cox, S., Oliver, A., & Tomás, J. M. (1998). Modeling safety climate in the prediction of levels of safety activity. Work and Stress, 12, 255–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678379808256865 Google Scholar
Cheyne, A., Oliver, A., & Tomás, J. M. (2005). The complexity, stability and diagnostic power of the safety climate concept. Loughborough, UK: Business School, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Cheyne, A., Oliver, A., & Tomás, J. M. (2008, October). A Multi-level model predicting safe behavior and compliance. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Working on Safety. Crete, Greece.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. D., Phillips, R. A., Sutherland, V. J., & Makin, P. J. (1994). Reducing accidents with goal-setting and feedback: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 219–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00564.x Google Scholar
Cox, S. J., & Cheyne, A. (2000). Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. Safety Science, 34, 111–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00009-6 Google Scholar
Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. M. (2007). Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 627–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.001 Google Scholar
Flin, R., Mearns, K., O’Connor, P., & Bryden, R. (2000). Measuring safety climate; identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34, 177–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6 Google Scholar
García, A. M., Boix, P., & Canosa, C. (2004). Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 6, 239–246.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel covariance component models. Biometrika, 74, 430–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/74.2.430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnqvist, K., Gustafsson, J. E., Muthén, B., & Nelson, G. (1994). Hierarchical models of ability at class and individual levels. Intelligence, 18, 165–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(94)90026-4 Google Scholar
Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y., Chen, J., DeArmond, S., Cigularov, K., & Chen, P. Y. (2007). Roles of safety climate and shift work on perceived injury risk: A multilevel analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 1088–1096. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.006 Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Kline, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mearns, K., Whitaker, S. M., & Flin, R. (2003). Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Safety Science, 41, 641–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00011-5 Google Scholar
Muthén, B. O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In Raftery, A. E. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 453–481). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2003). Safety climate and safety at work. In Barling, J. and Frone, M. R. (Eds.), The psychology of workplace safety (pp. 15–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 946–953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34, 99–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00008-4 Google Scholar
Oliver, A., Cheyne, A., Tomás, J. M., & Cox, S. (2002). The effects of organisational and individual factors on occupational accidents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 473–488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119691 Google Scholar
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes. In Forgas, J. P. & Williams, K. D. (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 253–270). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. C., Popp, E., & Mondore, S. (2006). Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: A group-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 681–688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.681 Google Scholar
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.65.1.96 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zohar, D. (2000). A group level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 587–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.587 Google Scholar
Zohar, D. (2003). Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. In Quick, J. & Tetrick, L. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational health psychology, (pp. 123–142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10474-006 Google Scholar
Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616 Google Scholar