Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:35:17.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Sickness and in Health: The Role of Housework Engagement in Work Productivity despite Presenteeism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2021

Catarina Correia Leal Open the ORCID record for Catarina Correia Leal [Opens in a new window]  and
Aristides I. Ferreira Open the ORCID record for Aristides I. Ferreira [Opens in a new window]
Catarina Correia Leal*
Affiliation:
ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Portugal)
Aristides I. Ferreira
Affiliation:
ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Portugal)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Catarina Correia Leal. ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa. Business Research Unit BRU-IUL. Av. das Forças Armadas, 1649–026 Lisboa (Portugal). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study is one of the first to investigate the effects of housework engagement on work productivity despite sickness presenteeism and to explore personality traits (i.e., conscientiousness) and gender differences among couples. Based on a sample of 180 heterosexual couples, an integrated model of both housework and workplace realities was proposed and tested based on the actor-partner interdependence model using structural equation modeling. The results verify that the higher the degree of women’s conscientiousness, the greater their and their partners’ level of productivity despite presenteeism. In addition, the higher the couple’s perception of partner support is, the greater their level of work productivity despite health problems, for both men and women. Results also confirm that housework engagement mediates the relationships between both conscientiousness and perceived partner support and work productivity despite health problems, for women, but not for men. This study denotes an advance in the literature on the relationships between personal and social resources within the family domain and work productivity despite sickness presenteeism. The findings support the applicability of the resource perspective of the Job Demands-Resources theory (JD-R) (i.e., motivational branch) to housework, as well as extend existing presenteeism models by providing evidence for the inclusion of the family domain in explaining this organizational phenomenon.

Keywords

conscientiousnesshousework engagementperceived partner supportwork productivity despite sickness presenteeism
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 24 , 2021 , e39
Copyright
© Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None

Funding Statement: This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Grant UIDB/00315/2020.

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf.Google Scholar
Alarcon, G., Eschleman, K. J., & Bowling, N. A. (2009). Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 23(3), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370903282600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averett, S. L., Bansak, C., & Smith, J. K. (2018). Behind every high earning man is a conscientious woman: A study of the impact of spousal personality on wages (IZA Discussion Papers Series, IZA DP No. 11756). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. http://ftp.iza.org/dp11756.pdf.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands–resources theory. In Cooper, C. L. (Ed.), Wellbeing: A complete reference guide. Vol. 3, Work and wellbeing (pp. 37–64). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. In Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Noba Scholar.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biernat, M., & Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2009). The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1562–1571. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bures, A. L., Henderson, D., Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Worley, J. (1996). The effects of spousal support and gender on worker’s stress and job satisfaction: A cross national investigation of dual career couples. Journal of Applied Business Research, 12(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v12i1.5837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, K. D., & Wu, J. (2012). The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 413– 435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111428817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicei, C. C. (2012). Examining the effects of work-family conflict. An exploratory study on sickness presenteeism. Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology, 3(1), 4–11.Google Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised neo personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G., & D.H., Saklofske, The SAGE Handbook of personality theory and assessment. Volume 2–Personality measurement and testing (pp. 179–198). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9.Google Scholar
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Geurts, S. A. E., & Taris, T. W. (2009). Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. Occupational Stress and Well Being, 7, 85–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2009)0000007006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, A. I., Mach, M., Martinez, L. F., Brewster, C., Dagher, G., Perez-Nebra, A., & Lisovskaya, A. (2019). Working sick and out of sorts: A cross-cultural approach on presenteeism climate, organizational justice and work–family conflict. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(19), 2754–2776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1332673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, A. I., Martinez, L. F., Sousa, L. M. & Cunha, J. V. (2010). Tradução e validação para a língua portuguesa das escalas de presentismo WLQ–8 e SPS–6 [Translation and validation into Portuguese of the presenteeism scales WLQ–8 and SPS–6]. Avaliação Psicológica, 9(2), 253–266.Google Scholar
Friede, A., & Ryan, A. M. (2005). The importance of the individual: How self-evaluations influence the work-family interface. In Kossek, E. E. & Lambert, S. J. (Eds.), LEA’s organization and management series. Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (p. 193–209). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Grandey, A. A., Cordeiro, B. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2005). A longitudinal and multisource test of the work-family conflict and job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, E., Lemyre, L., & Corneil, W. (2013). Presenteeism and absenteeism: Differentiated understanding of related phenomena. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Style, C. B. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 24, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J, & Minkov, M. (2005). Cultures and organizations : Software of the Mind (Vol. 2). Mcgraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, G. (2011). Attendance dynamics at work: the antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 483–500. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0025153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “big five” inventory—versions 4a and 54 (Tech. Report). Institute of Personality Assessment and Research.Google Scholar
Karanika-Murray, M., Biron, C., Hervieux, V., Whysall, Z., & Chen, H. (2021). Managing presenteeism to optimize health and performance. In Wall, T., Cooper, C. L., & Brough, P. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of organizational wellbeing (pp. 232–247). SAGE Publications Ltd. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781529757187.n16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karanika-Murray, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H. M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2013-0359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of nonindependence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596132007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivimäki, M., Head, J., Ferrie, J. E., Hemingway, H., Shipley, M. J., Vahtera, J., & Marmot, M. G. (2005). Working while ill as a risk factor for serious coronary events: The Whitehall II study. American Journal of Public Health, 95(1), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2003.035873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, E., Bunde, M., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., White, G. A., Pasch, L. A., & Adams, E. E. (2008). Partner support and marital satisfaction: Support amount, adequacy, provision, and solicitation. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 445–463. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00209.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LePine, J. A., LePine, M. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, W., Ma, J., Wang, L., & Wang, A. M. (2014). A double-edged sword: The moderating role of conscientiousness in the relationships between work stressors, psychological strain, and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkikangas, A., Feldt, T., Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (2013). Does personality matter? A review of individual differences in occupational well-being. In Bakker, A. B. (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 107–143). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2046-410X(2013)0000001008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, L. F., & Ferreira, A. I. (2012). Sick at work: Presenteeism among nurses in a Portuguese public hospital. Stress and Health, 28, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, L., Ferreira, A., & Nunes, T. (2018). Presenteeism and work–family/family–work conflict: A cross-cultural approach with two Latin countries. In Cooper, C. & Lu, L. (Eds.), Presenteeism at work (Cambridge Companions to Management, pp. 257–285). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107183780.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, L. R., Sawyer, K. B., Thoroughgood, C. N., Ruggs, E. N., & Smith, N. A. (2017). The importance of being “me”: The relation between authentic identity expression and transgender employees’ work-related attitudes and experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, L. L., Eddleston, K. A., & Veiga, J. F. (2002). Moderators of the relationship between work-family conflict and career satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 399–409. http://doi.org/10.5465/3069354.Google Scholar
McGregor, A., Magee, C. A., Caputi, P., & Iverson, D. (2016). A job demands-resources approach to presenteeism. Career Development International, 21(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses. (2011). Código deontológico da Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses [Deontological code of the Order of Portuguese Psychologists]. https://www.ordemdospsicologos.pt/pt/cod_deontologico.Google Scholar
Perrone, K. M., Wright, S. L., & Jackson, Z. V. (2009). Traditional and nontraditional gender roles and work–family interface for men and women. Journal of Career Development, 36(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845308327736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, S. J., Witt, L. A., Penney, L. M., & Atwater, L. (2010). The downside of goal-focused leadership: The role of personality in subordinate exhaustion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, B. W., Smith, J., Jackson, J. J., & Edmonds, G. (2009). Compensatory conscientiousness and health in older couples. Psychological Science, 20, 553–559. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02339.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, L., Cunha, V., & Wall, K. (2015). Homens, papéis masculinos e igualdade de género [Men, male roles and gender equality] [Policy brief I]. http://www.cite.gov.pt/pt/destaques/complementosDestqs/Policy_Brief_Homens_Iguald_Gen.pdf Comissão para a Igualdade no Trabalho e no Emprego.Google Scholar
Ruhle, S. A., & Süß, S. (2020). Presenteeism and absenteeism at work—an analysis of archetypes of sickness attendance cultures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09615-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1994). Predictors of happiness in married couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 17(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90279-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, J. V., & Gonçalves, G. (2010). Contribuição para a adaptação portuguesa da escala de percepção de suporte organizacional de Eisenberger, Huntington, e Sowa, Hutchison (1986) [Contribution to the Portuguese adaptation of the organizational support perception scale by Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchison e Sowa (1986)]. Laboratório de Psicologia, 8(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.642.Google Scholar
Sarti, D. (2014). Job resources as antecedents of engagement at work: Evidence from a long‐term care setting. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sendén, M. G., Schenck-Gustafsson, K. & Fridner, A. (2016). Gender differences in reasons for sickness presenteeism: A study among GPs in a Swedish health care organization. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 28(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0136-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamansky, S. L. (2002). Presenteeism…When being there is not being there. Public Health Nursing, 19(2), 79–80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.2002.19201.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2014). A critical review of the job demands- resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In Bauer, G. & Hämmig, O. (Eds.), Bridging occupational, organizational and public health (pp. 43–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, R. (1998). Presenteeism, power and organizational change: Long hours as a career barrier and the impact on the working lives of women managers. British Journal of Management, 9(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.9.s1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014a). Why do personality traits predict divorce? Multiple pathways through satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 978–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014b). The long reach of one’s spouse: Spouses’ personality influences occupational success. Psychological Science, 25, 2189–2198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 287–305. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110369842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–566. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walen, H. R., & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Benefits for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00035-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Y. J., DeYoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, L. A., & Carlson, D. S. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: Moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed