Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:42:00.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating One's Own and One's Relatives' Multiple Intelligence: A Study from Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Adrian Furnham  and
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
Adrian Furnham*
Affiliation:
University College London
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths College London
*
Reprint requests should be directed to: Professor A. Furnham, Department of Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H OAP(United Kingdom). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Participants from Argentina (N = 217) estimated their own, their partner's, their parents' and their grandparents' overall and multiple intelligences. The Argentinean data showed that men gave higher overall estimates than women (M = 110.4 vs. 105.1) as well as higher estimates on mathematical and spatial intelligence. Participants thought themselves slightly less bright than their fathers (2 IQ points) but brighter than their mothers (6 points), their grandfathers (8 points), but especially their grandmothers (11 points). Regressions showed that participants thought verbal and mathematical IQ to be the best predictors of overall IQ. Results were broadly in agreement with other studies in the area. A comparison was also made with British data using the same questionnaire. British participants tended to give significantly higher self-estimates than for relatives, though the pattern was generally similar. Results are discussed in terms of the studies in the field.

Participantes de Argentina (N = 217) estimaron su propia inteligencia global y múltiple, así como las de su pareja, sus padres y sus abuelos. Los datos argentinos mostraron que los varones proporcionaron estimaciones globales más altas que las mujeres (M = 110.4 vs. 105.1) además de estimaciones más altas en inteligencia numérica y espacial. Los participantes se percibían algo menos inteligentes que sus padres (2 puntos del CI) pero más inteligentes que sus madres (6 puntos), sus abuelos (8 puntos), y, en especial, sus abuelas (11 puntos). Las regresiones mostraron que los participantes creían que el CI verbal y numérico eran los mejores predictores del CI global. En general, los resultados eran similares a otros estudios del área. También se compararon los datos británicos con el mismo cuestionario. Los participantes británicos tendían a adjudicarse estimaciones significativamente más altas que a sus parientes, aunque, en general, el patrón era similar. Se comentan los resultados en términos de estudios en el mismo área.

Keywords

multiple intelligenceself-estimationother-estimationinteligencia multipleauto-estimaciónestimación de familiares
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , May 2005 , pp. 12 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beloff, H. (1992). Mother, father and me: Our IQ. The Psychologist, 5, 309–311.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (1997). Self-estimates of ability in men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 540–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betsworth, D. (1999). Accuracy of self-estimated abilities and therelationship between self-estimated abilities and realism for women. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner-ratings and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, M., & Stacey, B. (1993). Bias in IQ perception. The Psychologist, 6, 16.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. (1987). Massive IQ games in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, J. (1999). Searching for justice: The discovery of the gains over time. American Psychologist, 54, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2000). Parent's estimates of their own and theirchildren's multiple intelligences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence: Culture and genderdifferences in self and other estimates of General (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1381–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Akande, D. (2004). African parents' estimates of their own and their children's multiple intelligences. Current Psychology, 22, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Estimating one's own personality and intelligence scores. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A., Clark, K., & Bailey, K. (1999). Sex differences in estimates of multiple intelligences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 247–259.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Fong, G. (2000). Self-estimated and psychometrically measured intelligence: A cross-cultural and sex difference study. North American Journal of Psychology, 2, 191–199.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Fong, G., & Martin, N. (1999). Sex and cross-cultural differences in the estimated multi-faceted intelligence quotient score for self, parents and siblings. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Gasson, L. (1998). Sex differences in parental estimates of their children's intelligence. Sex Roles, 38, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Hosoe, T., & Tang, T. (2001). Male hubris and female humility? A cross- cultural study of ratings of self, parental and sibling multiple intelligence in America, Britain and Japan. Intelligence, 30, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Rakow, T., Sarmany-Schuller, I., & De Fruyt, F. (1999) European differences in self-perceived multiple intelligence. European Psychologist, 4, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1995). Sex differences in the estimation of intelligence. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality,10, 741–745.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1999). Correlations between self-estimated and psychometrically measured IQ. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Shahidi, S., & Baluch, B. (2002). Sex and culture differences in perceptions of estimated multiple intelligences for self and family: A British-Iranian comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 270–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Tang, T., Lester, D., O'Connor, R., & Montgomery, R. (2002). Estimates of ten multiple intelligences. European Psychologist, 7, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., & Ward, C. (2001). Sex differences, test experience and the self-estimation of multiple intelligence. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 30, 52–59.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goodnow, J., & Collins, W. (1990). Development according to parents: The nature, sources and consequences of parents' ideas. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hogan, H. (1978). IQ self-estimates of males and females. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 137–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstede, G. (1981). Cultures consequences. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Paulus, D., Lysy, D., & Yik, M. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests? Journal of Personality, 66, 523–555.Google Scholar
Petrides, K., & Furnham, A. (2000). Gender differencesin measured and self-estimated trait emotional intelligence. Sex Roles, 41, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rammstedt, B., & Rammsayer, T. (2000). Sex differences in self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rammstedt, B., & Rammsayer, T. (2001). Gender differences is self estimated intelligence in children and early adolescents. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 207–217.Google Scholar
Rammstedt, B., & Rammsayer, T. (2002). Self-estimated intelligence: Gender differences, relationship to psychometric intelligence and moderating effects of level education. European Psychologist, 7, 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, J., & Mulhern, G. (1995). Gender difference inself-estimated IQ: The need for care in interpreting group data. Personality andIndividual Differences, 18, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuen, A., & Furnham, A. (in press). Sex differences in self-estimation of multiple intelligences among Hong Kong Chinese Adolescents. High Ability Studies.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Gong, Y. (2001). Self-estimated intelligence and its related factors. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9, 193–195.Google Scholar