Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:17:34.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of the History of Adoption in the Emotional Adjustment of Adopted Adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Caroline Tozzi Reppold  and
Claudio Simon Hutz
Caroline Tozzi Reppold*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (Brazil)
Claudio Simon Hutz
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Caroline Reppold. Rua Honório Silveira Dias, 912/403 Bairro São João Porto Alegre/RS. Zip Code: 90550-150, (Brazil). Phone: +55-5191022673; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the decade of 1980, the model of stress and coping proposed for the assessment of vulnerability of adoptive families emphasizes that the emotional adjustment of those adopted is moderated by variables such as institutionalization, the manner and age at which the adoption was revealed, the change of first name, and the contact with the biological family. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship of these variables to the perceived parenting style, mood, and self-esteem of the adopted adolescents. Participants in the study were 68 adolescents, between the ages of 14 and 15, adopted during infancy through judicial channels. The adolescents responded to a questionnaire about the history of adoption and to scales of Parenting Styles, Depression and Self-esteem. The main results indicated that the late revelation of adoption and the change of the first name are connected to higher levels of depression and low self-esteem and to more frequent perceptions of negligent or authoritarian parenting style. The contact with the biological family was frequently mentioned among those who perceived their parents as authoritative and presented the best indicator of mood and self-esteem. These findings were discussed in light of the necessity for multidisciplinary actions which can improve the psychological adaptation of the adopting families.

Desde la década de 1980, el modelo de estrés y afrontamiento propuesto para la evaluación de la vulnerabilidad de las familias adoptivas resalta que la adaptación emocional de los adoptandos es moderado por variables tales como la institucionalización, la forma y la edad en que la adopción se reveló, el cambio del nombre de pila, y el contacto con la familia biológica. El objetivo de este estudio era investigar la relación de estas variables con el estilo percibido de crianza, el estado emocional y la autoestima de los adolescentes adoptados. Participaron en el estudio 68 adolescentes, entre 14 y 15 años de edad, adoptados durante la infancia a través de vías judiciales. Los adolescentes completaron un cuestionario sobre la historia de la adopción y las escalas de Estilo de Crianza, Depresión y Autoestima. Los resultados principales indicaron que la tardía revelación de la adopción y el cambio del nombre de pila se relacionan con niveles mayores de depresión y baja autoestima y a la percepción más frecuente de estilo de crianza negligente o autoritario. El contacto con la familia biológica se mencionaba frecuentemente entre los que percibían a sus padres como autoritarios y era el mejor indicador del estado emocional y de la autoestima. Se comentan estos resultados a la luz de la necesidad de actuaciones multidisciplinarias que puedan mejorar la adaptación psicológica de las familias adoptivas.

Keywords

adoptionadolescenceadjustmentvulnerabilityadopciónadolescenciaadaptaciónvulnerabilidad
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , November 2009 , pp. 454 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, M.& Dylla, D. (1998). The role of open adoption in the adjustment of adopted children and their families. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodzinsky, D. M. (1990). A stress and coping model of adoption adjustment. Em Brodzinsky, D. M. & Schechter, M. D. (Orgs.), The psychology of adoption (pp. 3–24). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodzinsky, D. M., Schechter, D. E., Graff, A. M., & Singer, L. M. (1984). Psychological and academic adjustment in adopted children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 582–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodzinsky, D. M., Schechter, M. D., & Henig, R. M. (1993). Being adopted: The lifelong search of self. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Brodzinsky, D. M., Smith, D. W., & Brodzinsky, A. B. (1998). Children's adjustment to adoption: Developmental and clinical issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child and Adolescent Statute (1990). Brazilian Law 8069, 13/07/1990. Porto Alegre: CORAG.Google Scholar
Costa, F. T., Teixeira, M. A. P., & Gomes, W. B. (2000). Responsividade e exigência: Duas escalas para avaliar estilos parentais. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 13, 465–473.Google Scholar
Diniz, J. S. (1994). Aspectos sociais e psicológicos da adoção. Em Freire, F. (Org.), Abandono e adoção: Contribuições para uma cultura da adoção II (pp. 105–120) Curitiba: Terre des Hommes.Google Scholar
Frasch, K., Brooks, D., & Barth, R. P. (2000). Openness and contact in adoptions by foster families. An eight-year follow-up. Family Relations, 49, 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, IL& Matarazzo, E. (2001). Prevalência de adoção intra e extrafamiliar em amostras clínicas e não clínicas de crianças e adolescentes. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 23, 149–155.Google Scholar
Goodman, G. S., Emery, R. E., & Haugaard, J. J. (1998). Developmental psychology and law: Divorce, child maltreated, foster care, and adoption. Em Damon, W. (Org. Série) & Sigel, I. E. & Renninger, K. A. (Orgs. Vol.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice. (5a ed., pp. 775–874). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Grotevant, H. D., & Kohler, J. K. (1999). Adoptive families. Em Lamb, M. E. (Org.), Parenting and child development in “nontraditional” families (pp. 161–190). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grotevant, H. D., McRoy, R. G., Elde, C. L., & Fravel, D. L. (1994). Adoptive family system dynamics: Variations by level of openness in adoption. Family Process, 33, 667–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnar, M. R., Bruce, J., & Grotevant, H. D. (2000). International adoption of institutionally reared children: Research and policy. Developmental and Psychopathology, 12, 677–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representation. Em Damon, W. (Org. Série) & Eisenberg, N. (Org. Vol.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development. (5a ed., pp. 553–617). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Harris, R.& Lindsay, C. (2002). How professionals think about contact between children and their birth parents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstra, MB., Van der Ende, J.& Verhulst, FC. (2000) Continuity and change of psychopathology from childhood into adulthood: a 14-year follow-up study. Journal of American Academic Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 850–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutz, C. S. (2000). Adaptação brasileira da escala de auto-estima de Rosenberg. Manuscrito não-publicado, Curso de PósGraduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RS.Google Scholar
Hutz, C. S., & Giacomoni, C. H. (2000). Adaptação brasileira do inventário de depressão infantil (CDI). Manuscrito não-publicado, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, RSGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, M. (1980/1981). Rating scales to asses depression in school-ages children. Acta Paedopsychiatrica, 46, 305–315.Google Scholar
Kovacs, M. (1985). The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 21, 995–998.Google ScholarPubMed
Kraft, A., Palombo, J., Wood, P., Mitchell, D.& Schimt, A. (1985a). Some theorical considerations on confidential adoption. Part I: The birthmother. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 2, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, A., Palombo, J., Wood, P., Mitchell, D.& Schimt, A. (1985b). Some theorical considerations on confidential adoption. Part I: The adoptive parent. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 2, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miall, , Charlene, and March, Karen. (2005). Open Adoption as a Family Form: Community Assessments and Social Support. Journal of Family Issues 26, 380–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B. C., Fan, X., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., & Dulmen, M. (2000). Comparison of adopted and nonadopted adolescents in a large, nationally representative sample. Child Development, 71, 1458–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J., & Fombonne, E. (1999). Psychopathology in adopted and nonadopted children: A clinical sample. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Advisory Mental Health Council. (1996). Basic behavioral science research for mental health: Vulnerability and resilience. American Psychologist, 51, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. L., Roberts, L. R., & Syre, C. R. (1993). Concepts of family among children and adolescents: Effects of cognitive level, gender, and family structure. Developmental Psychology, 29, 951–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reppold, CT.& Hutz, CS. (2003). Reflexão social, controle percebido e motivação à adoção: características psicossociais de mães adotivas. Estudos de Psicologia, 8, 15–24.Google Scholar
Ryburn, M. (1999). Contact between children placed away from home and their birth parents: A reanalysis of the evidence in relation to permanent placements. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 4, 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A. R., McGue, M. K., & Benson, P. L. (1998). The psychological adjustment of United States adopted adolescents and their nonadopted siblings. Child Development, 69, 791–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturgess, W.& Selwyn, J. (2007). Supporting the placements of children adopted out of care. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tieman, W, van der Ende, J.& Verhulst, F. (2005). Psychiatric disorders in young adult intercountry adoptees: an epidemiological study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 592–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhulst, F. C., Althaus, M., & Bieman, H. J. M. V. (1990). Problem behavior in international adoptees: II. Age at placement. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 104–110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von-Korff, L., Grotevant, H.& McRoy, R. (2006). Openness arrangements and psychological adjustment in adolescent adoptees. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 531–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed