Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:21:20.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Visual Aesthetics of the Workplace Matter? Analyzing the Assessment of Visual Aesthetics as Antecedent of Affective Commitment and Job Crafting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2019

Carolina González-Suhr ,
Sergio Salgado ,
Herman Elgueta  and
Carlos-María Alcover
Carolina González-Suhr*
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Frontera (Chile)
Sergio Salgado*
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Frontera (Chile)
Herman Elgueta
Affiliation:
Universidad de Magallanes (Chile)
Carlos-María Alcover
Affiliation:
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carolina González-Suhr or Sergio Salgado. Universidad de La Frontera. Departamento de Administración y Economía. Temuco (Chile). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carolina González-Suhr or Sergio Salgado. Universidad de La Frontera. Departamento de Administración y Economía. Temuco (Chile). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work, two objectives were addressed. First, the visual aesthetics assessment of the workplace was explored for the first time as a potential antecedent of the proactive behaviors of job crafting. Second, the potential mediating role of the affective organizational commitment in this relationship was analyzed. To address these purposes, a field study was conducted with a sample of 428 workers. Following a set of hypotheses, the results of the measurement model, χ2 (df) = 494.288 (215); CFI = .920; TLI = .906; RMSEA = .066, showed that the visual aesthetics assessment of the workplace was significantly correlated with three of the four dimensions of job crafting (r = .19 with ISO-JR, r = .15 with IC-JD and; r = .17 with IST-JR; p < .001) and with affective organizational commitment (r = .27, p < .001). In addition, through a structural equation model, χ2(df) = 494.895 (219); CFI = .921; TLI = .909; RMSEA = .065, positive and significant indirect effects were found from the visual aesthetic assessment of the workplace to the same three dimensions of job crafting, all through the affective organizational commitment: .17 with ISO-JR, .25 with IC-JD and, .23 with IST-JR; 95% CI [.097, .276], [.161, .361] and [.161, .361], respectively. The results obtained provide useful evidence for researchers and managers about the value of providing an aesthetically satisfactory workplace, which would enhance the affective commitment of employees and, consequently, positively affect the proactive behaviors of job crafting.

Keywords

affective organizational commitmentjob craftingorganizational aestheticsorganizational managementvisual aesthetics
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 22 , 2019 , E38
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research has been partially funded by Universidad de La Frontera, Project DI15–0056; and by Convenio de Desempeño Regional UNETE, Universidad de la Frontera, FRO 1301, Project UNT15–0001.

How to cite this article:

González-Suhr, C., Salgado, S., Elgueta, H., & Alcover, C. M. (2019). Does visual aesthetics of the workplace matter? Analyzing the assessment of visual aesthetics as antecedent of affective commitment and job crafting. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22. e38. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2019.37

References

Alcover, C. M., Martínez-Íñigo, D., & Chambel, M. J. (2012). Perceptions of employment relations and permanence in the organization: Mediating effects of affective commitment in relations of psychological contract and intention to quit. Psychological Reports, 110(3), 839–853. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.07.21.PR0.110.3.839-853CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banbury, S. P., & Berry, D. C. (2005). Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics, 48(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130412331311390CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R. A. (1994). The physical work environment of work settings: Effects on task performance, interpersonal relations, and job satisfaction. In Straw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 1–46). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands: Resources Theory. In Cooper, C. L. & Chen, P. (Eds.), Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 37–64). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2013). Job crafting and meaningful work. In Dik, B. J., Byrne, Z. S., & Steger, M. F. (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 81–104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berleant, A. (2018). Aesthetics and environment: Variations on a theme. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. New York, NY: Sage.Google Scholar
Chang, S. J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ChiangV. , M. V. , M., NúñezP. , A. P. , A., Martín, M. J., & SalazarB. , M. B. , M. (2010). Compromiso del trabajador hacia su organización y la relación con el clima organizacional: Un análisis de género y edad [Commitment of the worker towards his organization and the relation with the organizational climate: An analysis of gender and age]. Panorama socioeconómico, 28, 92–103.Google Scholar
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Paterson, N. L., Stadler, M. J., & Saks, A. M. (2014). The relative importance of proactive behaviors and outcomes for predicting newcomer learning, well-being, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dazkir, S. S., & Read, M. A. (2012). Furniture forms and their influence on our emotional responses toward interior environments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Groot, S. A., Weggeman, M., & van Aken, J. E. (2015). A request for organizational beauty: How positive aesthetic experiences contribute to affective commitment. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4282.2883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, A. S., & Andrade, C. C. (2017). Quality of the hospital experience: Impact of the physical environment. In Fleury-Bahi, G., Pol, E., & Navarro, O. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 421–440). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181–224. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ficapal-Cusí, P., Torrent-Sellens, J., Boada-Grau, J., & Hontangas-Beltrán, P. M. (2014). Job change without changing job? Exploring job crafting in Spain. IN3 Working Paper Series. Retrieved from https://in3wps.uoc.edu/in3/ca/index.php/in3-working-paper-series/index.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardi, P. (1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 565–580). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. J., Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Bipp, T. (2015). Job crafting and performance of Dutch and American health care professionals. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, S. D., Gifford, R., & McCunn, L. (2013). The selection, creation, and perception of interior spaces: An environmental psychology approach. In Brooker, G. & Weinthal, L. (Eds.), The handbook of interior design (pp. 278–290). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
Hancock, P. (2005). Uncovering the semiotic in organizational aesthetics. Organization, 12, 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405048575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harquail, C. V., & Wilcox King, A. (2010). Construing organizational identity: The role of embodied cognition. Organization Studies, 31, 1619–1648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610376143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornik, J. (1992). Tactile stimulation and consumer response. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/209314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 31(2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooij, D. T., Tims, M., & Akkermans, J. (2017). The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: The role of job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1209489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. H. (2014). The performance of MLR, USLMV, and WLSMV estimation in structural regression models with ordinal variables (Published doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, MI.Google Scholar
Lindgaard, G., & Whitfield, T. A. (2004). Integrating aesthetics within an evolutionary and psychological framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922031000086726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenthaler, P. W., & Fischbach, A. (2019). A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1527767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, J. C., & Morrow, P. C. (2010). Employee reactions to office redesign: A naturally occurring quasi-field experiment in a multi-generational setting. Human Relations, 63, 609–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709342932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Stanley, D. (2016). Employee commitment and performance. In Meyer, J. P. (Ed.), Handbook of employee commitment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. O. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and nonnormal variables. In Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 205–234). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K., & Abildgaard, J. S. (2012). The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers. Work & Stress, 26(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.733543CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldham, G. R., & Fried, Y. (2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, R., & Daniel, T. C. (2002). Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00051-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrou, P., Bakker, A. B, & van den Heuvel, M. (2016). Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: Implications for meaning-making and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90, 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rafaeli, A., & Vilnai-Yavetz, I. (2004). Instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism of physical artifacts as triggers of emotions. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922031000086735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandelands, L. E., & Buckner, G. C. (1989). Of art and work: Aesthetic experience and the psychology of feelings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 105–131.Google Scholar
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von Eye, A. & Clogg, C. C. (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schell, E., Theorell, T., & Saraste, H. (2011). Workplace aesthetics: Impact of environments upon employee health? Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 39, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR–2011-1182Google ScholarPubMed
Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126–146.Google Scholar
Strati, A. (2010). Aesthetic understanding of work and organizational life: Approaches and research developments. Sociology Compass, 4, 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00323.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, E. (1987). Work environments: Offices and factories. In Stokols, D. & Altman, I. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 733–782). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1211–1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veitch, J. A., Stokkermans, M. G., & Newsham, G. R. (2013). Linking lighting appraisals to work behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45, 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511420560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilnai-Yavetz, I., Rafaeli, A., & Yaacov, C. S. (2005). Instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism of office design. Environment and Behavior, 37, 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504270695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waistell, J. (2016). Can environmental aesthetics promote corporate sustainability? Organization & Environment, 29, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615592182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S. (2008). Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: Towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies, 29, 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607083104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, V., & Frenkel, M. (2011). Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organization Science, 22, 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110366036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Wingerden, J., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2016). A test of a job demands-resources intervention. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2014-0086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378011CrossRefGoogle Scholar