Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:04:45.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and Validation of a Measure of Emotional Distress in Survivors of Group Psychological Abuse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2019

Omar Saldaña ,
Emma Antelo ,
Carmen Almendros  and
Álvaro Rodríguez-Carballeira
Omar Saldaña
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona (Spain)
Emma Antelo
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona (Spain)
Carmen Almendros
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain)
Álvaro Rodríguez-Carballeira*
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Álvaro Rodríguez Carballeira. Departamento de Psicología Social y Psicología Cuantitativa, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d’Hebron 171, 08035 Barcelona (Spain). Phone: +34933125177. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of the negative consequences of psychological abuse, a scale was developed to specifically assess the emotional disturbances in individuals who had experienced abusive behaviors over a period of time within a cultic group. The Emotional Distress Scale in Survivors of Abusive Groups (EDS-SAG) was administered, along with other relevant measures of group psychological abuse and psychopathological symptoms, to 706 Spanish-speaking former members of different groups, distributed into two samples according to whether they had experienced group psychological abuse (n = 413) or not (n = 293). Analyses supported a unidimensional structure of the 18 items on the EDS-SAG, explaining 50.7% of the total variance. This factorial solution was found to be stable when the sample of victims was split by sex and by the age of involvement in the group. Results also showed adequate reliability of the scores and significant associations between the scores on the EDS-SAG and the scores on measures of group psychological abuse (PAEGS: .86, p < .001) and psychopathological symptoms (BSI: .30, p < .001; PTCI: .46, p < .001). The results obtained reveal that this new scale is a suitable tool for measuring emotional distress in Spanish-speaking survivors of abusive groups. In the research field, it would be possible to evaluate the antecedents of emotional distress or their protective factors. In applied contexts, it would be possible to rigorously evaluate the emotional difficulties of abuse victims, allowing a better diagnosis and therapeutic approach. All of this will contribute to the assessment and understanding of the long-term consequences of group psychological abuse.

Keywords

emotional abuseemotional disturbancesinterpersonal controlvictimization
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 22 , 2019 , E33
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PSI2016-75915-P, AEI/FEDER, EU).

How to cite this article:

Saldaña, O., Antelo, E., Almendros, C., & Rodríguez-Carballeira, A. (2019). Development and validation of a measure of emotional distress in survivors of group psychological abuse. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22. e33. Doi:10.1017/sjp.2019.32

References

Almendros, C., Carrobles, J. A., Rodríguez Carballeira, Á., & Jansa, J. M. (2004). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Group Psychological Abuse Scale [Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Group Psychological Abuse Scale.]. Psicothema, 16(1), 132–138.Google Scholar
Almendros, C., Carrobles, J. A., Rodríguez-Carballeira, Á., & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2009). Abandono y malestar psicológico en ex-miembros de grupos sectarios [Disaffiliation and psychological distress in former members of cultic groups]. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 17(2), 181–202.Google Scholar
Ansara, D. L., & Hindin, M. J. (2011). Psychosocial consequences of intimate partner violence for women and men in Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1628–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, J., Lynn, S. J., & Malinoski, P. (2000). Are cultic environments psychologically harmful? Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00093-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, J. G., McNiff, J., Clapp, J. D., Olsen, S. A., Avery, M. L., & Hagewood, J. H. (2011). Exploring negative emotion in women experiencing intimate partner violence: Shame, guilt, and PTSD. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco, A., Díaz, D., Gaborit, M., & Amaris, M. d. C. (2010). El sentido del mundo y el significado del yo: Inventario de Cogniciones Postraumáticas (ICPT) en población hispana [World schema and self schema: The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) in Hispanic population]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 42(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
Boeri, M. W. (2002). Women after the utopia: The gendered lives of former cult members. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31(3), 323–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241602031003003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, D. D. (2010). Post-involvement difficulties experienced by former members of charismatic groups. Journal of Religion and Health, 49(3), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9251-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coates, D. D. (2012). “Cult commitment” from the perspective of former members: Direct rewards of membership versus dependency inducing practices. Deviant Behavior, 33(3), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.548302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, X. Q. (2015). Elder abuse: Systematic review and implications for practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63(6), 1214–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, C., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Rodrigues, T. (2015). Being bullied and feeling ashamed: Implications for eating psychopathology and depression in adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence, 44, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durocher, N. (1999). Insights from cult survivors regarding group support. The British Journal of Social Work, 29(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/29.4.581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasde, I., & Block, R. A. (1998). Cult experience: Psychological abuse, distress, personality characteristics, and changes in personal relationships reported by former members of Church Universal and Triumphant. Cultic Studies Journal, 15, 192–221.Google Scholar
Hibbard, R., Barlow, J., MacMillan, H., the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, & American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Child Maltreatment and Violence Committee (2012). Psychological maltreatment. Pediatrics, 130(2), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, P. (2015). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malinoski, P., Langone, M. D., & Lynn, S. (1999). Psychological distress in former members of the International Churches of Christ and noncultic groups. Cultic Studies Journal, 16, 33–51.Google Scholar
Martin, P. R., Langone, M. D., Dole, A. A., & Wiltrout, J. (1992). Post-cult symptoms as measured by the MCMI before and after residential treatment. Cultic Studies Journal, 9, 219–250.Google Scholar
Martín-Albo, J., Núñez, J. L., Navarro, J. G., & Grijalvo, F. (2007). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and validation in university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006727CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, C. H., & Salazar, C. F. (2014). Second-generation adult former cult group members’ recovery experiences: Implications for counseling. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 36(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-013-9201-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, J. W., & Fitzpatrick, D. C. (2012). Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(15), 1–8.Google Scholar
Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Saldaña, O., Almendros, C., Martín-Peña, J., Escartín, J., & Porrúa-García, C. (2015). Group psychological abuse: Taxonomy and severity of its components. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, M. J., & Follingstad, D. R. (2014). Women’s exposure to psychological abuse: Does that experience predict mental health outcomes? Journal of Family Violence, 29(6), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9621-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruipérez, M. A., Ibáñez, M. I., Lorente, E., Moro, M., & Ortet, G. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the BSI: Contributions to the relationship between personality and psychopathology. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña, O., Antelo, E., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., & Almendros, C. (2018). Taxonomy of psychological and social disturbances in survivors of group psychological abuse. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(9), 1003–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1405315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña, O., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., & Almendros, C. (2018). The Psychological Abuse Experienced in Groups Scale: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version. Behavioral Psychology / Psicología Conductual, 26(3), 421–436.Google Scholar
Saldaña, O., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Almendros, C., & Escartín, J. (2017). Development and validation of the Psychological Abuse Experienced in Groups Scale. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña, O., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Almendros, C., & Guilera, G. (2018). Group psychological abuse and psychopathological symptoms: The mediating role of psychological stress. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518815710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saldaña, O., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Almendros, C., & Nishida, K. (2018). Psychological Abuse Experienced in Groups Scale: Psychometric properties of the Japanese version. Japanese Psychological Research, 60(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaghaghi, A., Bhopal, R. S., & Sheikh, A. (2011). Approaches to recruiting “hard-to-reach” populations into research: A review of the literature. Health Promotion Perspectives, 1(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.5681/hpp.2011.009Google ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. T., & Ofshe, R. (1990). Thought reform programs and the production of psychiatric casualties. Psychiatric Annals, 20, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19900401-06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, A. E., & Arias, I. (2001). Psychological abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder in battered women: Examining the roles of shame and guilt. Violence & Victims, 16(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.16.1.65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, L. J., & Langone, M. D. (1986). Cultism: A conference for scholars and policy makers. Cultic Studies Journal, 3, 117–134.Google Scholar
Winocur, N., Whitney, J., Sorensen, C., Vaughn, P., & Foy, D. (1997). The Individual Cult Experience Index: The assessment of cult involvement and its relationship to postcult distress. Cultic Studies Journal, 14, 290–306.Google Scholar
Wolfson, L. B. (2002). A study of the factors of psychological abuse and control in two relationships: Domestic violence and cultic systems (Published doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, CT. Retrieved from https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3062106/Google Scholar