Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:10:53.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of General Intelligence in Spanish and Moroccan Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Amelia Díaz ,
Khadija Sellami ,
Eugenia Infanzón ,
Teresa Lanzón  and
Richard Lynn
Amelia Díaz*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Khadija Sellami
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Eugenia Infanzón
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Teresa Lanzón
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
Richard Lynn
Affiliation:
University of Ulster (UK)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Amelia Díaz. Universidad de Valencia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study is to fill a gap in intelligence research by presenting data for the average IQ in Morocco and for a comparable sample in Spain. Adult samples were administered the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) (Raven, Court, & Raven, 2001) and scored for the total test and for the three sub-factors of gestalt continuation, verbal-analytical reasoning and visuospatial ability identified by Lynn, Allik, and Irwing (2004). The total test and the three factors have shown satisfactory reliability. Our results for the Moroccan sample show significant relationship between general intelligence factor, gestalt continuation and visuospatial ability with education level and income. Conversely, these variables have been shown to be independent for the Spanish sample. This sample obtained significantly higher scores for the four factors assessed than the Moroccan one. These differences have been found also comparing samples with the same education levels. Finally, the errors percentage for Moroccans has been higher than for Spaniards in all the items, suggesting that the level of difficulty was higher for the Moroccan sample.

El objetivo de este trabajo es llenar un hueco en el campo de la investigación en inteligencia con la presentación de datos sobre el Cociente de Inteligencia (CI) promedio en Marruecos comparándolo con una muestra similar de adultos españoles. Para ello, se ha administrado a ambas muestras la Escala General de las Matrices Progresivas de Raven (SPM) (Raven, Court, & Raven, 2001), obteniéndose la puntuación total de la escala así como de los tres sub-factores aislados por Lynn, Allik, and Irwing (2004). La fiabilidad de la escala total y de los tres factores ha sido satisfactoria. Nuestros resultados muestran relaciones significativas entre el factor general de inteligencia, el factor de continuación de una figura (gestalt) y el factor visoespacial con el nivel educativo y los ingresos económicos en la muestra marroquí. Por el contrario, estas variables fueron independientes en el caso de la muestra española. Por otra parte, esta muestra ha obtenido puntuaciones significativas más altas en los cuatro factores de inteligencia evaluados que la muestra marroquí. Estas diferencias se han mantenido incluso cuando se han comparando muestras con los mismos niveles educativos. Finalmente, el porcentaje de errores de la muestra marroquí ha sido más alto que en la muestra española en todos los ítems, lo que indica que el nivel de dificultad ha sido más alto para la muestra marroquí.

Keywords

general intelligenceSPM factorsSpainMoroccointeligencia generalfactores de SPMEspañaMarruecos
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 526 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboussaleh, Y., Ahami, A. O. T., Bonthoux, F., Marwndaz, C., Valdois, S., & Rusinek, S., (2006). Performances cognitive des enfants anémiques ages de 6 à 11 ans en milie urbain du nord-ouest Morocain [Cognitive performances of anaemic children aged 6 to 11 years in an urban area of North-West Morocco]. Journal de Thérapie Comportamentale et Cognitive, 16, 49–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1155-1704(06)70198-7Google Scholar
Albalde, E., & Muñoz, J., (1993). El test PMS de Raven y los escolares de Galicia. [Raven's SPM and school students in Galicia]. A Coruña, España: Servicio de Publicaciones Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Benton, D., & Roberts, G., (1988). Effects of vitamin and mineral supplementation on intelligence of schoolchildren. The Lancet, 331, 140–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(88)92720-1Google Scholar
Colom, R., & García-López, O., (2002). Sex differences in fluid intelligence among high school graduates. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 445–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00040-XGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G., (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London, England: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R., (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.95.1.29Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R., (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.101.2.171Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R., (1998). The g Factor. Westport, CT:Praeger.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R., & Rushton, J. P., (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235Google Scholar
Kumari, V., & Corr, P. J., (1998). Trait anxiety, stress and the menstrual cycle: Effect on Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 615–623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00233-XGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R., (2009). Fluid intelligence but not vocabulary has increased in Britain, 1979–2008. Intelligence, 37, 249–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R., Allik, J., & Irwing, P., (2004). Sex differences on three factors identified in Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Intelligence, 32, 411–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T., (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport, CT: PraegerGoogle Scholar
Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T., (2006). IQ and global inequality. Athens, GA: Washington Summit Books.Google Scholar
Raven, J., (1996). Raven matrices progresivas, manual. [Raven's progressive matrices, manual] Madrid, Spain: Publicaciones de Psicología Aplicada.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. C., (1996). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J., (2001). Matrices progresivas de Raven. Escala general. Manual. [Raven's progressive matrices, SPM. Manual] Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., & Skuy, M., (2000). Performance on Raven's matrices by African and white university students in South Africa. Intelligence, 28, 251–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(00)00035-0Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Skuy, M., & Fridjhon, P., (2002). Jensen effect among African, Indian and white engineering students in SouthAfrica on Raven' standard progressive matrices, Intelligence, 30, 409–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00093-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Skuy, M., & Fridjhon, P., (2003). Performance on Raven's advance progressive matrices by African, East Indian and white engineering students in SouthAfrica, Intelligence, 31, 123–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00140-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellami, K., Infanzón, E., Lanzón, T., Díaz, A., & Lynn, R., (2010). Sex differences in mean and variance of intelligence: Some data from Morocco. Mankind Quarterly, 51, 84–92.Google Scholar
Seisdedos, N., (1995). Manual de las matrices progresivas de Raven. Escalas CPM, SPM general y APM superior. [Raven's progressive matrices manual, CPM, SPM and APM] Madrid, Spain: TEA.Google Scholar
Sijtsma, K., & Resing, W. C. M., (1991). Scalability of an intelligence test for different ethnic groups. In Bleichrodt, N. & Drenth, P. J. D. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publisher.Google Scholar
Skuy, M., Gewer, A., Osrin, Y., Khunou, D., Fridihon, P., & Rushton, P., (2002). Effects on mediated learning experience on Raven's matrices scores of African and non-African university students in SouthAfrica. Intelligence, 30, 221–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00085-XGoogle Scholar
Tanzer, N. K., Gittler, G., & Ellis, B., (1995). Cross-cultural validation of item complexity in a LLTM—calibrated spatial ability test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 170–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taschinski, R., (1985). Research on the culture fairness of Raven's progressive matrices with Turkisch children in Germany. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 32, 229–239.Google Scholar
Te Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H., (1997). Comparability of GATB scores for immigrant and majority groups members: Some Dutch finding. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 675–687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.82.5.675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Te Nijenhius, J., Evers, A., & Mur, J. P., (2000).The validity of the Differential Aptitude Test for the assessment of immigrant children. Educational Psychology, 20, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Te Nijenhuis, J., Voskujil, O. F., & Schijve, N. B., (2001). Practice and coaching on IQ tests: Quite a lot of g. International Journal on Selection and Assessment, 9, 302–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00182Google Scholar
Te Nijenhuis, J., Tolboom, E., Resing, W., & Bleichrodt, N., (2004a). Does cultural background influence the intellectual performance of children from immigrant groups?: Validity of the RAKIT intelligence test for immigrant children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 10–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.10Google Scholar
Te Nijenhuis, J., de Jong, M. J., Evers, A., & van der Flier, H., (2004b). Are cognitive differences between immigrant and majority groups diminishing? European Journal of Personality, 18, 405–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.511Google Scholar
Te Nijenhuis, J., van Vianen, A. E. M., & van der Flier, H., (2007). Score gains on g-loaded tests: No g. Intelligence, 35, 283–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.006Google Scholar