Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:52:28.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Class Anxiety in Secondary Education: Exploring Structural Relations with Perceived Control, Engagement, Disaffection, and Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2015

Antonio González*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
José María Faílde Garrido
Affiliation:
Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
Yolanda Rodríguez Castro
Affiliation:
Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
María Victoria Carrera Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Universidade de Vigo (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Antonio González. Universidad de Vigo. Facultad C.C. de la Educación. Ourense (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relationships between class-related anxiety with perceived control, teacher-reported behavioral engagement, behavioral disaffection, and academic performance. Participants were 355 compulsory secondary students (9th and 10th grades; Mean age = 15.2 years; SD = 1.8 years). Structural equation models revealed performance was predicted by perceived control, anxiety, disaffection, and engagement. Perceived control predicted anxiety, disaffection, and engagement. Anxiety predicted disaffection and engagement, and partially mediated the effects from control on disaffection (β = –.277, p < .005; CI = –.378, –.197) and engagement (β = .170, p < .002; CI = .103 .258). The negative association between anxiety and performance was mediated by engagement and disaffection (β = –.295, p < .002; CI = –.439, –.182). Anxiety, engagement, and disaffection mediated the effects of control on performance (β = .352, p < .003; CI = .279, .440). The implications of these results are discussed in the light of current theory and educational interventions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbuckle, J. (2013). AMOS 22. User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Netwall, N. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 948963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016096 Google Scholar
Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Student emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and academic outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 2535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.001 Google Scholar
Gallagher, M. W., Bentley, K. H., & Barlow, D. H. (2014). Perceived control and vulnerability to anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 571584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9624-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, G. A., Epstein, Y. M., Schorr, R. Y., & Warner, L. B. (2011). Beliefs and engagement structures: Behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. Mathematics Education, 43, 547560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0348-z Google Scholar
Hall, N. C., Perry, R. P., Chipperfield, J. G., Clifton, R. A., & Haynes, T. L. (2006). Enhancing primary and secondary control in achievement settings through writing-based attributional retraining. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 361391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.4.361 Google Scholar
Hortop, E. G., Wrosch, C., & Gagné, M. (2013). The why and how of goal pursuits: Effects of global autonomous motivation and perceived control on emotional well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 675687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9349-2 Google Scholar
Kim, C., & Hodges, C. B. (2012). Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation, and achievement in an online mathematics course. Instructional Science, 40, 173192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9165-6.Google Scholar
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83, 432479. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891 Google Scholar
Linnenbrink, E. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multidimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. In Schutz, P. & Pekrun, R. (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 107124). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A. J. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 239269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003 Google Scholar
Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, , Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025988.Google Scholar
Meyer, D., & Turner, J. (2007). Scaffolding emotions in classrooms. In Schutz, P. & Pekrun, R. (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 243258). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mychailyszyn, M. P., Beidas, R. S., Benjamin, C. L., Edmunds, J. M., Podell, J. L., Cohen, J. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2011). Assessing and treating child anxiety in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 223232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20548.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Thomas, K. (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement performance. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value anteicedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 531-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019243 Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students` learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 3648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. (2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ)- user’s manual. Munich, Germany. University of Munich: Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-García, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A. & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259282). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In Pekrun, R. & Linnembrink-García, L. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education. (pp. 120141). New York, NY: Routledge Google Scholar
Pereira, A. I. F., Barros, A., & Mendonça, D. (2012). Perceived control and anxiety in Portuguese children. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 631637. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38874.Google Scholar
Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., & Pelletier, S. T. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 776789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.776 Google Scholar
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365386). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 161182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.557329 Google Scholar
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.Google Scholar
Ros, I., Goikoetxea, J., Gairín, J., & Lekue, P. (2012). Implicación del alumnado en la escuela: Diferencias interindividuales e intercentros [Student engagement in the school: Interpersonal and inter-center differences]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 17, 291307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.4557 Google Scholar
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 23(1), 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965 Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549 Google Scholar
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kinderman, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012840.Google Scholar
Skinner, E. A., Kinderman, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in the academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233.Google Scholar
Skinner, E., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A. & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 2144). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2.Google Scholar
Skinner, E., Pitzer, J., & Brule, H. (2014). The role of emotion in engagement, coping, and the development of motivational resilience. In Pekrun, R. & Linnembrink-García, L. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 331347). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stupnisky, R. H., Perry, R. P., Hall, N. C., & Guay, F. (2012). Examining perceived control level and instability as predictors of first-year college students’ academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 8190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.01.001.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 432445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20307.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M. (2014). Anxiety in education. In Pekrun, R. & Linnembrink-García, L. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 265288). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar