Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:30:21.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Internet technology and poverty relief

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Jodette M. Fox  and
Stuart C. Carr
Jodette M. Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northern Territory University, Darwin, Australia
Stuart C. Carr*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Massey University Auckland North Shore, New Zealand/Aotearoa [email protected]
*
Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unlike their television counterparts, website fund-raising advertisements designed by international aid agencies do not have to be compressed into short grabs and bites. This means that website technology might be used to convey relatively abstract, situational attributions for poverty, which are known to increase charitable donations. Seventy undergraduates from Australia's Northern Territory University viewed a simulated aid agency website containing varying degrees of textual and visual information about these situational causes of poverty; completed the situational attributions-focused Causes of Third World Poverty Questionnaire (CTWPQ); and reported their intentions to donate money to the simulated aid organisation's poverty relief projects. Consistent with attribution theory, both situational attributions made about poverty and charitable donation intentions were optimised when the website contained an optimal amount of (textual and visual) information on the situational causes of poverty. These preliminary findings suggest how Internet technology can be applied to raise dollar donations, as well as increasing tolerance within diverse regions like the South Pacific.

Type
Short papers
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , 2000 , pp. 52 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea and Massey University, New Zealand/Aotearoa 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ActionAid. (1995). The reality of aid '95: An independent review of international aid. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Limited.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. C., Carr, S. C., & MacLachlan, M. (2001). Attributing “Third World” poverty in Australia and Malawi: A case of donor bias? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. C. (2000). Privilege, privation, and proximity: ‘Eternal triangle’ for development? Psychology and Developing Societies, 12, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. C., & MacLachlan, M. (1998). Actors, observers, and attributions for “Third World” poverty: Contrasting perspectives from Malawi and Australia. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. C., McAuliffe, E., & MacLachlan, M. (1998). Psychology of aid. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 605–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, C. K., & Chan, C. M. (2000). Social-cognitive factors of donating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organisation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attributions across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. (1999). SPSS: Analysis without anguish. Milton, NSW: Jacaranda Wiley Ltd.Google Scholar
Downer, A. (1997). Better aid for a better future – Seventh Annual Report to Parliament on Australia's Developmental Cooperation Program and the Government's Response to the Committee of Review of Australia's Overseas Aid Program. Canberra: Government Publishing Services/AusAid.Google Scholar
Feizkhah, E. (2001). How to win friends. TIME, June 4, 16–19.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. (2001). Globalisation: For and against (extracted arguments by the Oxford University Professor). New Zealand Herald, May 3, p. A13.Google Scholar
Fogarty, G. J. (1998). Response bias in computerised tests. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 10, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fountain, S. (1995). Education for development. London: Hodder & Stoughton/UNICEF.Google Scholar
Godwin, N. (1994). A distorted view: Myths and images of developing countries. Development Bulletin, 30, 46–48.Google Scholar
Griffiths, K. (1999). Aid adverts that juxtapose rich and poor: A preliminary test of their efficacy in North Australia. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 11, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, L. G. (1993). Statistical applications for the behavioural sciences. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Harper, D. (1996). Accounting for poverty: From attribution to discourse. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 249–265.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on inter-group causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsella, A. J. (1998). Toward a “global community psychology:” Meeting the needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 53, 1282–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehryar, A. H. (1984). The role of psychology in national development: Wishful thinking and reality. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Gorman, F. (1992). Charity and change: From bandaid to beacon. Melbourne: World Vision.Google Scholar
Radley, A., & Kennedy, M. (1995). Charitable giving by individuals: A study of attitudes and practice. Human Relations, 48, 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. M. (1998). Internet advertising placement. Marketing Tools, 5, 12–13.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2 nd edition). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thornton, B., Kirchner, G., & Jacobs, J. (1991). Influence of a photograph on a charitable appeal: A picture may be worth a thousand words when it has to speak for itself. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, G. (1999). Internet marketing: Advertising as information. Texas Business Review, 2, 4–6.Google Scholar
World Bank. (1999). PovertyNet: Data on poverty [accessed August 13th, 2000]. http://www.worldbank.org/povertv/data/regions/data.htm Google Scholar