Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:57:18.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identity and Cultural Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Christian Maier*
Affiliation:
Private Practice Bonn, Germany
*
Gerhard-von-Are-Str. 4-6, D-5300 Bonn 1, Germany

Extract

In psychology, the study of tradition-directed societies (Riesman, 1950) has usually served to “confirm” existing theories as being of universal validity. The same holds true of psychoanalysis: in 1929, Geza Roheim travelled to Normanby Island in Melanesia to prove the universality of the Oedipus complex. He did so in reaction to Bronislaw Malinowski, whose research with the Trobriand Islanders had led him to question that idea. Similarly, C. G. Jung thought he recognized specific archetypal manifestations of the collective unconscious in the tribal traditions of primitive populations.

The primary concern of the psychoanalysts was to identify and understand certain regularities in the aliens and to draw parallels between alien and western psychological processes. They were aware of the different psychological structure of members of tradition-directed societies, but their evaluation was biased by their feeling of mental and moral superiority. This bias often resulted in an overly obvious reproduction of the earlier colonialist power structures. Ultimately, the alienness of those populations was as frightening as their similarity; they reminded us of the alien within ourselves, of our own unconscious which Freud called the foreign, or alien, interior.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea & University of Central Queensland 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Erdheim, Mario (1992). Das Eigene und das Fremde. Psyche, 46, 730744.Google Scholar
Erikson, E.H: (1946). Ego development and historical change. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2, 359396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (27 06 1992). Author and title unknown.Google Scholar
Klein, G. S. (1976). Psychoanalytic theory. An exploration of essentials. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Parin, P., Morgenthaler, F., & Parin-Matthèy, (1980). Fear thy neighbor as thyself. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Time (8 04 1991). “Scarlet letters: Punishment writ large for crime in Papua New Guinea.”Google Scholar