Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:00:28.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Empirical Relevancy of Mental States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

David Lea
David Lea*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology & Philosophy University of Papua New Guinea
*
Department of Psychology and Philosophy, University of Papua New Guinea, Box 320, University Post Office, NCD, Papua New Guinea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I defend the following argument: 1) Empirical investigation can only be conducted with reference to statements that are empirically relevant; 2) Statements that refer to mental states cannot be defined so as to render them empirically relevant; 3) Therefore, there can be no empirical investigation of mental states.

Type
Articles
Information
South Pacific Journal of Psychology , Volume 4 , 1991 , pp. 6 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © University of Papua New Guinea & University College of Central Queensland 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. (1965). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, J. (1989). Empirical functionalism and conceivability arguments. Philosophical Psychology, 2, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place, U. (1964). Consciousness is just a brain process. In Flew, A. (Ed.), Body, mind, and death (276–287). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sarraute, N. (1956). L'ere du soupcon: essais sur le roman. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). The philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). New York: MacMillan Co.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logicophilosophicus (Pears, D. & McGuinness, B., Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1931)Google Scholar