Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:39:04.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is an Enlightenment Film?Cinema and the Rhetoric of Social Hygiene in Interwar Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2015

Andreas Killen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the discursive production of risk and its management in the German “enlightenment film” of the interwar period. From the sexual enlightenment films of the immediate postwar era to the Nazi-era sterilization films, public health campaigns mobilized new ideas about hygiene and the new resources of the mass media. Depicting a world composed of discrete risks (venereal disease, hereditary illness), on the one hand, and supplying information on how to manage such risks, on the other, public officials and experts invested considerable resources in this project of public education. Yet insofar as this project addressed controversial aspects of human behavior, and often proposed controversial solutions, this campaign of state-sponsored enlightenment remained an ambivalent one. Particularly in campaigns against venereal disease, leading advocates were frequently drawn into debates both about film's value as medium of mass instruction and the nature of the public they sought to address, a public perceived in fundamental ways as “at risk.” Their efforts routinely provoked charges that enlightenment films on sexual conduct could incite the very behaviors they strove to warn audiences against. By the end of the 1920s, the hopes placed in public enlightenment campaigns seemed to have waned. And yet the enlightenment film underwent a significant revival during the Nazi era. The paper concludes by examining the interconnections between the Nazis' reconceptualization of public enlightenment, risk, and strategies for managing it.

Type
Special Section: Moving Targets: Risk, Security, and the Social in Twentieth-Century Europe
Information
Social Science History , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 107 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (February 26, 1917) “Auklärung durch den Film.” Vossiche Zeitung. BA R 8034 II 2799, Bl. 107.Google Scholar
Anonymous (July 31, 1919) “Aufklärungsfilm als Schundfilm.” BA R 86/943.Google Scholar
Anonymous (August 10, 1919) “Eine homosexuelle Hochburg.” Staatsburger Zeitung. GStA Rep. 76, VIII B.Google Scholar
Anonymous (April 27, 1922) “Trügerische Aufklärung.” Freie Presse. BA R1501/109371, Bl. 154.Google Scholar
Anonymous (February 5, 1938) “Was wünscht das Publikum?” Rheinisch-Westfalische Zeitung. BA NS 15/165.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1934) “Sünden der Vergangenheit in der gesundheitlichen Volksaufklärung.” Volk und Rasse 9: 290–92.Google Scholar
Becker, Jörg (2006) “Völkische Visionen von Biokratie und Schönheit. Rassenselektion im NS-Kulturfilm,” in Reichert, Ramón (ed.) Kulturfilm im “Dritten Reich.” Vienna: Synema: 47–66.Google Scholar
Bock, Gisela (1986) Zwangssterilization im Nationalsozialismus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Bonah, Christian, and Laukötter, Anja (2009) “Moving images: Film in science and medicine—science and medicine in film.” Gesnerus 66 (3): 121–46.Google Scholar
Bonhoeffer, Karl (January 26, 1921) Abschrift to PMVW. GStA Rep. 76, VIII B.Google Scholar
Burleigh, Michael (1994) Death and Deliverance: “Euthanasia” in Germany 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Lisa (1995) Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine's Visual Culture. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter (1992) “The image of objectivity.” Representations 40 (1): 81–128.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edward Ross (2004) “Bio-politics, fascism, democracy: Some reflections on our discourse about ‘modernity.’” Central European History 37 (1): 1–48.Google Scholar
Filmoberprüfstelle (1926). Falsche Scham. BA R 1501/111804.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Sheila (2002) The Commissariat for Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frercks, Rudolf (1938) “Opfer der Vergangenheit.” BA R 8034/II/2805.Google Scholar
Friedländer, Saul (2009) Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1933–1945. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, Peter (1996) “Did Weimar fail?” Journal of Modern History 68 (3): 629–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Walter (1936) “Drei Jahre rassenpolitische Aufklärungsarbeit.” Volk und Rasse 11: 331–37.Google Scholar
Gross, Walter (1937) “Der Rassen- und Sippengedanke im deutschen Filmschaffen.” Völkischer Beobachter 241: date 24.8.37.Google Scholar
Gross, Walter (1939) “Filme bringen Aufklärung.” Ärzteblatt für Berlin 44.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Atina (1995) Reforming Sex: The German Movement for Birth Control and Abortion Reform 1920–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunning, Tom (1986) “The cinema of attractions: Early film, its spectator, and the avant-garde.” Wide Angle 8 (3–4): 63–70.Google Scholar
Hagener, Malte, ed. (2000) Geschlecht in Fesseln: Sexualität zwischen Aufklärung und Ausbeutung im Weimarer Kino. Munich: Edition Text and Kritik.Google Scholar
Hake, Sabine (2001) Popular Cinema of the Third Reich. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Albert (1921) Das Lichtspielgesetz vom 12. Mai 1920. Berlin: Stilke.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Magnus (1919) “Aus der Bewegung.” Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufe 19 (1–2): 111–33.Google Scholar
Holquist, Peter (1997) “Information is the alpha and omega of our work: Bolshevik surveillance in its pan-European context.” The Journal of Modern History 69 (3): 415–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jazbinsek, Dietmar (2000) “Vom Sittenspiegel der Grossstadt zum Sittenfilm,” in Hagener, Malte (ed.) Geschlecht in Fesseln: Sexualität zwischen Aufklärung und Ausbeutung im Weimarer Kino. Munich: Edition Text and Kritik: 81–102.Google Scholar
Johannes, M. (1934) “Film und Rasse.” Volk und Rasse 5: 155–56.Google Scholar
Kiliani, Richard (April 22, 1919) “Auslands-Filmpropaganda.” BA R 901, 71942.Google Scholar
Killen, Andreas (2012) “Weimar cinema between hypnosis and enlightenment,” in Laffan, M. and Weiss, M. (eds.) Fears Past. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 91–113.Google Scholar
Koch, Gertrud (2001) “Der phobische Blick. Zur Körper- und Stimmeninszenierung im ‘Euthanasie’-Propagandafilm.” Zeitgeschichte 4 (28): 228–35.Google Scholar
Koonz, Claudia (2003) The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Kreimeier, Klaus (1999) The UFA Story. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kreimeier, Klaus (2005a) “Ein deutsches Paradigma. Die Kulturfilmabteilung der UFA,” in Kreimeier, Klaus (ed.) Geschichte des dokumentarischen Films in Deutschland, Bd. 2 Weimarer Republik 1918–1933. Stuttgart: Reclam: 67–86.Google Scholar
Kreimeier, Klaus, ed. (2005b) Geschichte des dokumentarischen Films in Deutschland, Bd. 2 Weimarer Republik 1918–1933. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Annette (1988) Cinema, Censorship, and Sexuality 1909–1925. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leiser, Erwin (1974) Nazi Cinema. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ludendorff, Erich (1919) Meine Kriegserrinerungen. Berlin: E. S. Mittler und Sohn.Google Scholar
Oswald, Richard (1919) Anders als die Andern. Weimarer Republik.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev (1989) Max Webers Diagnose der Moderne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev (1994) “The genesis of the final solution from the spirit of science,” in Crew, D. (ed.) Nazism and German Society. New York: Routledge: 274–99.Google Scholar
Podoll, Klaus (2000) “Geschichte des Lehrfilms und des popularwissenschaftlichen Aufklärungsfilms in der Nervenheilkunde in Deutschland 1895–1929.” Fortschritte in der Neurologie und Psychiatrie 68 (11): 523–29.Google Scholar
Poore, Carol (2007) Disability in Twentieth Century German Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pressebericht der RPA (January 28, 1936) NA/T-81/22.Google Scholar
Proctor, Robert (1999) The Nazi War on Cancer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
RAHV (1927) “Ärzte an der Front! Gesundheitsfeldzug 1927.” BA R 86/937.Google Scholar
Reichert, Ramón, ed. (2006) Kulturfilm im “Dritten Reich.” Vienna: Synema.Google Scholar
Reichert, Ramón (2007) Im Kino der Humanwissenschaften. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Rentschler, Eric (1996) The Ministry of Illusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
RMdI to Landesregierungen (1919) BA R 1501/109370, Bl. 22.Google Scholar
Rosenhaft, Eve (1996) “Lesewut, Kinosucht, Radiotismus: Zur (geschlechter-)politischen Relevanz neuer Massenmedien in den 1920er Jahren,” in Lüdtke, Alf (ed.) Amerikanisierung: Traum und Alptraum in Deutschland des 20. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Steiner: 119–43.Google Scholar
Ross, Corey (2008) Media and the Making of Modern Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, Ludwig (1987) Sterilisation und Euthanasie im Film des “Dritten Reiches.” Husum: Matthiessen.Google Scholar
Roth, Karl-Heinz (1985) “Filmpropaganda für die Vernichtung der Geisteskranken und Behinderten im Dritten Reich.” Beiträge zur nationalsozialistischen Gesundheits- und Sozialpolitik 2: 125–93.Google Scholar
RPA Arbeitstagung (June 20–29, 1935) NA/T-81/9.Google Scholar
Sarasin, Philipp (2001) Reizbare Maschinen. Eine Geschichte des Körpers 1765–1914. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Sauerländer, Willibald (2000) “Vom Heimatschutz zur Rassenhygiene. Über Paul Schultze-Naumburg,” in Gilman, S. and Schmölders, C. (eds.) Gesichter der Weimarer Republik. Cologne: Dumont: 32–50.Google Scholar
Schlüpmann, Heide (1990) Unheimlichkeit des Blicks: Das Drama des frühen deutschen Kinos. Frankfurt: Stroemfeld.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulf (2000) “‘Der Blick auf dem Körper’: Sozialhygienische Filme, Sexualaufklärung und Propaganda in der Weimarer Republik,” in Hagener, Malte (ed.) Geschlecht in Fesseln: Sexualität zwischen Aufklärung und Ausbeutung im Weimarer Kino. Munich: Edition Text and Kritik: 23–46.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulf (2002) Medical Films, Ethics, and Euthanasia in Nazi Germany. Husum: Matthiessen.Google Scholar
Sommer, Robert (1935) “Der medizinische Unterrichtsfilm.” Film und Bild 1: 45–47.Google Scholar
Steakley, James (1999) “Cinema and censorship in the Weimar Republic: The case of Anders als die Andern.” Film History 11 (2): 181–203.Google Scholar
Sturm, Eva (2000) “Von der Zensurfreiheit zum Zensurgesetz,” in Hagener, Malte (ed.) Geschlecht in Fesseln: Sexualität zwischen Aufklärung und Ausbeutung im Weimarer Kino. Munich: Edition Text and Kritik: 63–80.Google Scholar
Thomalla, Curt (1922) “Medizin und Arzt im Spielfilm. Kritische Bemerkungen anlässlich des ‘Dr. Mabuse.’” Der Kinematograph (July 23).Google Scholar
Thomalla, Curt (1926) Falsche Scham. Berlin: Film-Bücherei.Google Scholar
Thomalla, Curt (1927) “Aus den memoiren des deutschen Lehrfilms.” Film-Kurier (October 18).Google Scholar
Thomalla, Curt (1929) “The development of the medical film and of those dealing with hygiene and general culture in Germany.” International Review of Educational Cinematography 4:439–53.Google Scholar
Thomalla, Curt (1933) “Die biologische Revolution marschiert.” Beamten-Blatt Dresden 3: 111–13.Google Scholar
Usborne, Cornelie (1992) The Politics of the Body in Weimar Germany. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Verhey, Jeffrey (1997) “Some lessons of the war: The discourse on propaganda and public opinion in Germany in the 1920s,” in Hüppauf, B. (ed.) War, Violence, and the Modern Condition. Berlin: de Gruyter: 99–118.Google Scholar
Von Keitz, Ursula (2005a) Im Schatten des Gesetzes: Schwangerschaftskonflikt und Reproduction im deutsch-sprachigen Film 1918–1933. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar
Von Keitz, Ursula (2005b) “Disziplinierung der Bilder.” In Kreimeier (ed.) Geschichte des dokumentarischen Films in Deutschland, Bd. 2 Weimarer Republik 1918–1933. Stuttgart: Reclam: 284–300.Google Scholar
Weber, Matthias (1993) Ernst Rüdin: eine kritische Biographie. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, P., and Hoffmann, K., eds. (2003) Triumph der Bilder. Kultur- und Dokumentarfilme vor 1945 im Internationalen Vergleich. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, P., and Hoffmann, K. (2005) Geschichte des dokumentarischen Films in Deutschland, Bd. 3 “Drittes Reich,” 1933–1945. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Peter (2005) “Propagandafilme der NSDAP,” in Zimmerman, P. and Hoffman, K. (eds.) Geschichte des dokumentarischen Films in Deutschland, Bd. 3 “Drittes Reich,” 1933–1945. Stuttgart: Reclam: 505–29.Google Scholar