Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:08:38.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The U.S. Census as a Source in Political History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Kenneth Winkle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Political historians have long depended on aggregate records of political behavior—“election returns”—as a crucial resource in the historical study of American politics. During the past 30 years, however, the “new” political historians have increasingly turned to the U.S. census to reveal relationships between political and social behavior in the American past. The veritable revolution in American political history in recent decades, in fact, has largely depended on the political analysis of census records. Political historians now routinely mine the U.S. census for social, demographic, and economic information about voters and officeholders, states and regions, specific decades, and even “political eras.” Census data are most crucial to the political history of the nineteenth century and have benefited, in particular, the debate over levels of voter turnout, the study of political leadership through collective biography, and the ethnocultural model of political behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , Winter 1991 , pp. 565 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, H.W., and Allen, K. W. (1981) “Vote fraud and data validity,” in Clubb, J. M., Flanigan, W. H., and Zingale, N. H. (eds.) Analyzing Electoral History: A Guide to the Study of American Voter Behavior. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 153-93.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. J. (1988) The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bohmer, D. A. (1978) “The Maryland electorate and the concept of a party system in the early national period,” in Silbey, J. H., Bogue, A. G., and Flanigan, W. H. (eds.) The History of American Electoral Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 146-73.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. F., and DeBats, D. A. (1978) “Identifiable voting in nineteenth-century America: Toward a comparison of Britain and the United States before the secret ballot.” Perspectives in American History, o. s., 11: 259-88.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. F., and DeBats, D. A. (1980) “Individuals and aggregates: A note on historical data and assumptions.” Social Science History 4: 229-50.Google Scholar
Burnham, W. D. (1965) “The changing shape of the American political universe.” American Political Science Review 59: 7–28.Google Scholar
Burnham, W. D. (1986) “Those high nineteenth-century American voting turnouts: Fact or fiction?” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16: 613-44.Google Scholar
Cassedy, J. H. (1969) Demography in Early America: Beginnings of the Statistical Mind, 1600-1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clemence, T. G. (1985) “Historical perspectives on the decennial census.” Government Information Quarterly 2: 355-68.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. (1972) “Change in the American electorate,” in Campbell, A. and Converse, P. E. (eds.) The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 263–337.Google Scholar
Davenport, D. P. (1989) “Migration to Albany, New York, 1850-1855.” Social Science History 13: 159-85.Google Scholar
Dubester, H. J. (1948) State Censuses: An Annotated Bibliography of Censuses of Population Taken after the Year 1790 by States and Territories of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. (1985) “Nominal record linkage and the study of nonsecret voting: A Danish case.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 15: 419-43.Google Scholar
Formisano, R. P. (1971) The Birth of Mass Political Parties: Michigan, 1827-1861. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, G. (1986) “Computing antebellum turnout: Methods and models.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16: 579–611.Google Scholar
Henretta, J. (1979) “Social history as lived and written.” American Historical Review 84: 1293–1322.Google Scholar
Kleppner, P. (1982) Who Voted? The Dynamics of Electoral Turnout, 1870-1980. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Knights, P. R. (1969) “A method for estimating census underenumeration.” Historical Methods Newsletter 3: 5–8.Google Scholar
McKay, M.V.(1981) “Constitutional implications of a population undercount: Making sense of the census clause.” Georgetown Law Journal 69: 1427-63.Google Scholar
Parkerson, D.H. (1982) “How mobile were nineteenth-century Americans?” Historical Methods 15: 99–109.Google Scholar
Pessen, E. (1973) Riches, Class, and Power before the Civil War. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Shade, W. G. (1987) “Society and politics in antebellum Virginia’s Southside.” Journal of Southern History 53: 163-93.Google Scholar
Sharpless, J. B., and Shortridge, R. M. (1975) “Biased underenumeration in census manuscripts: Methodological implications.” Journal of Urban History 1:409-39.Google Scholar
Shelby County (1847) Quadrennial enumeration of white adult males. Wright State University Archives, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.Google Scholar
Shelby County (1849) Poll book. Wright State University Archives, Wright State University, Dayton, Oh.Google Scholar
Shelby County (1850) Poll book. Wright State University Archives, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.Google Scholar
Shelby County (1851) Quadrennial enumeration of white adult males. Wright State University Archives, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.Google Scholar
Shortridge, R. M. (1981) “Estimating voter participation,” in Clubb, J. M., Flanigan, W. H., and Zingale, N. H. (eds.) Analyzing Electoral History: A Guide to the Study of American Voter Behavior. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 137-52.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, S. (1973) The Other Bostoniane: Poverty and Progress in the American Metropolis, 1880-1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1850) Census of population, Shelby County, Ohio. National Archives, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Walker, F. A. (1872) The Ninth Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Winkle, K.J. (1988) The Politics of Community: Migration and Politics in Antebellum Ohio. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. D., and Hunt, W. C. (1900) The History and Growth of the United States Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar