Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:40:09.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Threat, Deterrence, and Penal Severity: An Analysis of Flogging in the Royal Navy, 1740–1820

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2018

Patrick Underwood ,
Steven Pfaff  and
Michael Hechter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perceived threats to established social order can influence the willingness of those in authority to inflict punishments as well as the severity of those punishments. Our article explores that proposition in the case of summary punishment by flogging in the Royal Navy. In the Royal Navy commanders were given the power to inflict flogging for a host of offenses. Prevailing penal thinking emphasized general deterrence, whereby punishment of a few serious offenders would deter the body of seamen. Eighteenth-century reforms were intended to rationalize and normalize flogging and limit its severity. Qualitative evidence indicates that naval commanders saw the established order under attack after 1789 and, emphasizing moral offenses, imposed tighter discipline on their crews. The evidence we have assembled based on a randomly selected sample of ships between 1740 and 1820 shows that flogging aboard ships was moderate up until the “Age of Revolution” that began after 1789 but increased dramatically in its frequency and severity in the wake of the French Revolution. Multivariate analysis shows that greater penal severity is associated with several factors, including a period effect associated with the onset of the revolutionary age. Our findings are consistent with existing research that suggests that disorder influences the willingness to punish.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Fall 2018 , pp. 411 - 439
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allardyce, Alexander (1883) Memoirs of the Honourable George Keith Elphinstone, Viscount Kiether, Admiral of the Red. Edinburgh: Blackwood.Google Scholar
Baumer, Erik, and Martin, Kimberly H. (2013) “Social organization, collective sentiment, and legal sanctions in murder cases.” American Journal of Sociology 119 (1): 131–182.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine, and Sasson, Theodore (2000) The Politics of Injustice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Richard (2008) Evangelicals in the Royal Navy, 1775–1815. London: Boydell.Google Scholar
Boucher, Jane ed. (2012) Memoir of the Life of Admiral Sir Edward Codrington Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Anthony G. (2006) “The Nore Mutiny: Sedition or ships’ biscuits?” The Mariners’ Mirror 92 (1):60–74.Google Scholar
Byrn, John D. (1989) Crime and Punishment in the Royal Navy: Discipline on the Leeward Island Station, 1784–1812. Aldershot, UK: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, John and Trevor Hastie (1992) Statistical Models in S. Pacific Grove: Wadsworth Press.Google Scholar
Churchill, Winston S. (1956) The Age of Revolution: A History of the English-Speaking Peoples Vol. 3. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co.Google Scholar
Claver, Scott (1954) Under the Lash: A History of Corporal Punishment in the British Armed Forces. London: Torchstream.Google Scholar
Cock, Randolph, and Rodger, N. A. M. (2006) A Guide to the Naval Records in the National Archives of the UK. University of London, Institute of Historical Research.Google Scholar
Colley, Linda (2003) Britons: Forging a Nation, 1707–1837, 2nd ed. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Cookson, John E. (1797) The British Armed Nation, 1793–1815. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Costa, Dora, and Kahn, Matthew (2008) Heroes and Cowards: The Social Face of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dann, John C ed. (1988) The Nagle Journal. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Doyle, William (1990) The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dull, Jonathan (2009) The Age of the Ship of the Line. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Earle, Peter (1998) Sailors: English Merchant Seamen, 1650–1775. London: Meuthen.Google Scholar
Eder, Markus (2004) Crime and Punishment in the Royal Navy of the Seven Years’ War, 1755–1763. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Erikson, Kai (2005) Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance, Rev. ed. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Frykman, Niklas (2009) “Seamen on late eighteenth-century European warships.” International Review of Social History 54:67–93.Google Scholar
Frykman, Niklas (2010) “The mutiny on the Hermione: Warfare, revolution and treason in the Royal Navy.” Journal of Social History 44 (1): 159–187.Google Scholar
Garland, David (1990) Punishment and Modern Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David (2002) The Culture of Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geller, Amanda, and Fagan, Jeffrey (2010) “Pot as pretext: Marijuana, race, and the new disorder in New York City street policing.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7 (4): 591–633.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Fagan, Jeffrey, and Kiss, Alex (2012) “An analysis of New York City Police Department’s ‘stop-and-frisk’ policing in the context of claims of racial bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 (479): 813–823.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jack P. (1977) “Social control, deterrence, and perspectives on social order.” Social Forces 56 (2): 408–423.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Arthur N. (1976) “Buggery and the British Navy, 1700–1861.” Journal of Social History 10 (1): 72–98.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Arthur N. (1980) “Crime as disorder: Criminality and the symbolic universe of the eighteenth century British naval officer.” in R. W. Love (ed.) Changing Interpretations and New Sources in Naval History. York, UK: Garland: 110–122.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Arthur N. (1983) “The nature of mutiny in the British Navy in the eighteenth century.” in D. M. Masterson (ed.) Naval History: The Sixth Symposium of the U.S. Naval Academy. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources: 111–120.Google Scholar
Gill, Ellen (2016) Naval Families, War, and Duty in Britain, 1740–1820. Martelsham, UK: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Julie H., Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Phillip E. (1999) “Rage and reason: The psychology of an intuitive prosecutor.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29:781–795.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Albert (1979) The Friends of Liberty: The English Democratic Movement in the Age of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie (2006) The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Kesebir, Selin (2010) “Morality,” in Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley: 797–832.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael (1998) Internal Colonialism, Rev. ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael, Pfaff, Steven, and Underwood, Patrick (2016) “Grievances and the genesis of rebellion: Mutiny in the Royal Navy, 1740–1820.” American Sociological Review 81 (1): 165–189.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric (1962) The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848. New York: American Library.Google Scholar
Horne, Christine (2009) The Rewards of Punishment: A Relational Theory of Norm Enforcement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenks, Timothy (2006) Naval Engagements: Patriotism, Cultural Politics and the Royal Navy, 1793–1815. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, Peter (2000) Crime, Justice and Discretion in England, 1740–1820. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
King, Peter (2006) Crime and Law in England, 1750–1840. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
La Fevre, Peter, and Harding, Richard eds. (2000) Precursors of Nelson: British Admirals of the Eighteenth Century. London: Stockpole.Google Scholar
Langford, Paul (1984) “The eighteenth century.” in K. O. Morgan (ed.) The Oxford Illustrated History of Britain. New York: Oxford University Press: 352–418.Google Scholar
Lavery, Brian (1998) Shipboard Life and Organisation, 1731–1815. London: Navy Record Society.Google Scholar
Lavery, Brian (2010) Royal Tars: The Lower Deck of the Royal Navy, 875–1850. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Samuel (1843) Thirty Years from Home, or, a Voice from the Lower Deck. Boston: Whittemore.Google Scholar
Lennon, Daniel A. (1991) “A communitarian army? Status and role considerations in the use of courts-martial in the United States Army.” Deviant Behavior 12 (1): 31–79.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer, Jesse, Goldberg, and Philip, Tetlock(1998) “Sober Second Thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attribution of responsibility.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24/6: 563–574.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael A. (1960) A Social History of the Navy, 1793–1815. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Christopher (1995) The Keith Papers: Selected Papers of Admiral Viscount Keith. London: Naval Records Society.Google Scholar
Lyon, David (1993) The Sailing Navy List: All the Ships of the Royal Navy—Built, Purchased and Captured—1688–1860. London: Conway Maritime Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, John (1823) Royal Naval Biography, or Memoirs of the Services. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Matsueda, Ross (2013) “Rational choice research in criminology.” in Rafael Wittek, Timothy Snijders, and Victor Nee (eds.) Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 283–321.Google Scholar
May, William Edward (1976) “Notes for historical research on the Royal Navy.” Military Affairs 46 (4): 186–187.Google Scholar
McLynn, Frank (1991) Crime and Punishment in Eighteenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, Jonathan (1985) The Cutlass and the Lash: Mutiny and Discipline in Nelson’s Navy. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Pfaff, Steven, Hechter, Michael, and Corcoran, Katy E. (2016) “The problem of solidarity in insurgent collective action: The Nore Mutiny of 1797.” Social Science History 40 (2): 247–270.Google Scholar
Philp, Mark ed. (2006) Resisting Napoleon: The British Response to the Threat of Invasion, 1797–1815. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Pope, Dudley (1981) Life in Nelson’s Navy. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Pope, Dudley (1987) The Devil Himself: The Mutiny of 1800. London: Alison Press.Google Scholar
Rediker, Markus (1987) Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (1982) The Articles of War: The Statutes Which Governed Our Fighting Navies, 1661, 1749, and 1886. Havant, UK: Mason.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (1986) The Wooden World: An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (2002) “Honour and duty at sea, 1660–1815.” Historical Research 75 (190):425–447.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (2004) The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain, 1649–1815. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rucker, Derek D., Polifroni, Mark, Tetlock, Philip E., and Scott, Amanda (2004) “On the assignment of punishment: The impact of general-societal threat on the moderating role of severity.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (6):673–684.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon (1989) Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sharpe, James A. (1999) Crime in Early Modern England, 1550–1750, 2nd ed. New York: Addison.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. (2002) “Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice.” Psychological Review 109 (3):451–471.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. (1980) The Making of the English Working Class, Rev. ed.. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Twigger, Robert (1999) “Inflation: The value of the pound 1750–1998.” Research Paper 99/20, Economic Policy and Statistics Section, House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
Wells, Roger (1983) Insurrection: The British Experience, 1795–1803. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Van Buuren, Stef, and Oudshoorn, Karin (1999) “Flexible multivariate imputation by MICE.” Leiden, The Netherlands: TNO Prevention and Health, Report PG/VGZ/99.054.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2009) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage-Learning.Google Scholar