Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:12:15.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

There and Back Again: The Selectivity of Recidivism in Belgian Prisons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2020

Ewout Depauw Open the ORCID record for Ewout Depauw [Opens in a new window]
Ewout Depauw*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Ghent University
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The “panoptic” powers characteristic of nineteenth-century criminal justice systems created prison sources that are increasingly used to study past populations. Each step of the criminal process has its own selection logic, leading to a predominance of unskilled and low-skilled men and women in prison samples. There are also crucial differences between the profiles of single and repeat offenders. This article employs a sample of more than 27,000 individual admissions to Belgian prisons in the nineteenth century to explore these trends in greater depth. Recidivists form a specific subset of the prison population. Detailed comparisons of recidivists and nonrecidivists are therefore useful as they help to understand the selection mechanisms inherent in prison data. Male recidivists were predominately low-waged workers incarcerated for minor acts of violence or misconduct classified as disturbances of the peace. Female recidivists were disproportionately low-skilled workers arrested for beggary and sex work. Recidivists also differed in their stature. Male recidivists in Belgian prisons were shorter than the average prisoner. By contrast, female recidivists were taller than one-time offenders. These height differences have important implications for our understanding of well-being in the past.

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 44 , Special Issue 3: Selection Bias and Social Science History , Fall 2020 , pp. 445 - 462
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altink, Sietske (1983) Huizen van illusies: bordelen en prostitutie van Middeleeuwen tot heden. Utrecht: Veen.Google Scholar
Baten, Joerg, and Murray, John E. (2000) “Heights of men and women in nineteenth-century Bavaria: Economic, nutritional and disease influences.” Explorations in Economic History (37): 351–69.10.1006/exeh.2000.0743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, Guinnane, Timothy W., and Mroz, Thomas A. (2017) “Sample-selection biases and the industrialization puzzle.” The Journal of Economic History 77 (1): 171–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, Guinnane, Timothy W., and Mroz, Thomas A. (2019) “Diagnosing sample-selection bias in historical heights: A Reply to Komlos and A’Hearn.” The Journal of Economic History 79 (4): 1154–75.10.1017/S002205071900055XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, Moehling, Carolyn, and Price, Gregory N. (2010) “Short criminals: Stature and crime in early America.” NBER Working Paper 15945.10.3386/w15945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Scott Alan (2007) “Statures of 19th century Chinese males in America.” Annals of Human Biology (34): 173–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, Scott Alan (2008) “Health during industrialization: Evidence from the nineteenth-century Pennsylvania prison system.” Social Science History 32 (3): 347–72.Google Scholar
Carson, Scott Alan (2009) “Geography, insolation, and vitamin D in nineteenth century US African-American and white statures.” Explorations in Economic History (46): 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Scott Alan (2011) “Nineteenth century African-American and white US statures: The primary sources of vitamin D and their relationship with height.” Journal of Bioeconomics (13): 1–15.10.1007/s10818-010-9096-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beer, Hans (2010) “Physical stature and biological living standards of girls and young women in the Netherlands, born between 1815 and 1865.” The History of the Family (15): 60–75.10.1016/j.hisfam.2009.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depauw, Ewout (2017) “Tall farmers and tiny weavers rural living standards and heights in Flanders, 1830–1870.” Tijdschrift voor Socio-Economische Geschiedenis 14 (3): 56–84.10.18352/tseg.946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyson, Donald, and Fenchel, Francois (2015) “Prison registers, their possibilities and their pitfalls: The case of local prisons in nineteenth-century Quebec.” The History of the Family 20 (2): 163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendrau, Paul, Little, Tracy, and Goggin, Claire (1996) “A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!” Criminology 34 (4): 575–608.10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, Bary S., David, J. Cox, and Farrall, Stephen (2007) Criminal Lives: Family Life, Employment, and Offending. Clarendon Studies in Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217205.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrell, Sarah, Meredith, David, and Oxley, Deborah (2009) “Measuring misery: Body mass, ageing and gender inequality in Victorian London.” Explorations in Economic History (46): 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Kris, and Maxwell-Stewart, Hamish (2015) “Introduction: Health, human capital, and early economic development in Australia and New Zealand.” Australian Economic History Review 55 (2): 105–11.10.1111/aehr.12072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Kris, Maxwell-Stewart, Hamish, Oxley, Deborah, and Stankovich, Jim (2015) “Growing incomes, growing people in nineteenth-century Tasmania.” Australian Economic History Review 55 (2): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Paul, and Nicholas, Stephen (1995) “Male and female living standard in England and Wales 1812–57: Evidence from criminal height records.” Economic History Review (48): 470–81.Google Scholar
Komlos, John (2004) “How to (and how not to) analyze deficient height sample: An introduction.” Historical Methods (37): 160–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, John, and Coclanis, Peter (1997) “On the puzzling cycle in the biological standard of living: The case of antebellum Georgia.” Explorations in Economic History (34): 433–59.10.1006/exeh.1997.0680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell-Stewart, Hamish, Cracknell, Matthew, and Inwood, Kris (2015) “Height, crime and colonial history.” Law, Crime and History 5 (1): 25–42.Google Scholar
Mechant, Maja (2014) “Geboren en getogen in kwetsbaarheid? De familiale achtergronden van prostituees werkzaam in Brugge tijdens de achttiende eeuw,” in Devos, Isabelle, Koen, Matthijs, and Van de Putte, Bart (eds.) Kwetsbare groepen in/en historische demografie. Leuven: Acco: 47–69.Google Scholar
Meredith, David, and Oxley, Deborah (2015) “Blood and bone: Body mass, gender and health inequality in nineteenth-century British families.” The History of the Family 20 (2): 204–30.10.1080/1081602X.2015.1036902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monballyu, Jos (2006) Zes eeuwen strafrecht: de geschiedenis van het Belgische strafrecht (1400–2000). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L. (2009) “Stature and economic development in South China, 1810–1880.” Explorations in Economic History (46): 53–69.10.1016/j.eeh.2008.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Norval, and Rothman, David J. (1995) The Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in Western Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Stephen (1988) Convict Workers: Reinterpreting Australia’s Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Stephen, and Oxley, Deborah (1993) “The living standards of women during the Industrial Revolution, 1795–1820.” Economic History Review (46): 723–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, Stephen, and Oxley, Deborah (1996) “Living standards of women in England and Wales, 1785–1815: New evidence from Newgate prison records.” Economic History Review (49): 591–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, Stephen, and Steckel, Richard H. (1991) “Heights and living standards of English workers during the early years of industrialization.” The Journal of Economic History (51): 937–57.10.1017/S0022050700040171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Grada, Cormac (1991) “The heights of Clonmel prisoners 1845–9: Some dietary implications.” Irish Economic and Social History (18): 24–33.Google Scholar
Piper, Alana Jayne, and Nagy, Victoria (2017) “Versatile offending: Criminal careers of female prisoners in Australia, 1860–1920.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 48 (2): 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiman, Jeffrey (1996) … And the Poor Get Prison: Economic Bias in American Criminal Justice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Riggs, Paul (1994) “The standard of living in Scotland 1800–50,” in Komlos, John (ed.) Stature, Living Standards and Economic Development: Essays in Anthropometric History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 60–75.Google Scholar
Sunder, Marco (2004) “The height of Tennessee convicts: Another piece of the ‘Antebellum Puzzle.’” Economics & Human Biology 2 (1): 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatarek, Nancy E. (2006) “Geographical height variation among Ohio Caucasian male convicts born 1780–1849.” Economics & Human Biology 4 (2): 222–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed