Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:06:48.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology’s Retreat: The Decline of Rural Telephony in The United States, 1920-1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Claude S. Fischer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One million fewer American farms had telephones in 1940 than in 1920; the instrument was disconnected in at least a third of the farm homes that once had it. Knowing how and why this “devolution” (Mattingly and Aspbury, 1985) occurred can expand our understanding of the social role of technology, diffusion of innovation, and more generally, twentieth-century modernization in America.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , Fall 1987 , pp. 295 - 327
Copyright
copyright © Social Science History Association 1987 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acme Mutual Telephone Association, (n.d.) “Acme Mutual Telephone Association 1905-1969.” Manuscript, Museum of Independent Telephony, Abilene, KA.Google Scholar
Allred, C. E., Robinson, T. L., Luebke, B. H., and Nesraug, S. R. (1937) Rural Cooperative Telephones in Tennessee. Rural Research Series Monograph No. 45. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J. (1983) “Farm foreclosures in the United States during the interwar period.” Journal of Economic History 43 (December): 885–903.Google Scholar
American Telephone and Telegraph Company (A.T.& T.). (1932a) “Selected statistics relative to residence and farm markets,” Chief Statistician’s Division (November), mimeo courtesy of A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J. (1932b) Untitled. Chief Statistician’s Division (July 27), mimeo courtesy of A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J. (1940) “Families and residence telephones,” Chief Statistician’s Division (December 18), mimeo courtesy of A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J. (1941a) “Rural population and telephones,” Chief Statistician’s Division (June 13), mimeo courtesy of A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J. (1941b) “Final results of U.S. Census of Agriculture ...,” Chief Statistician’s Division (September 25), mimeo courtesy of A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J. (1947) Untitled letter to all comptrollers, Chief Statistician’s Division (April 2), mimeo courtesy of A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
Armstrong, , Christopher, , and Nelles, H. V. (1986) Monopoly’s Moment: The Organization and Regulation of Canadian Utilities, 1830-1930. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Atwood, R. A. (1984) “Telephony and its cultural meanings in southeastern Iowa, 1900-1917,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (1985) “The farmer as a social problem: Reform, professionalization, and the country life movement.” Paper presented to the Organization of American Historians, Minneapolis, April.Google Scholar
Berger, M. L. (1979) The Devil Wagon in God’s Country: The Automobile and Social Change in Rural America, 1883-1929. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Blalock, H. W. (1940) “Streamlining rural telephone service.” Public Utilities Fortnightly 26 (10 October): 466–473.Google Scholar
Brock, G. W. (1981) Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics of Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, J. (1976) Telephone: The First Hundred Years. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Brown, D. C. (1980) Electricity For Rural America: The Fight for the R. E. A. Contributions in Economics and Economic History No. 29 Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Brown, D. C. (1982) “North Carolina rural electrification: Precedent of the R. E. A.” North Carolina Historical Review 59: 109–124.Google Scholar
Brown, L. A. (1981) Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Builta, F. C. (c. 1930) “How can publicity assist in meeting our responsibility to the rural telephone user?” in “Publicity Conferences: of the Bell System, 1921-1934,” Box 1310: 73–82; A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
Burfiend, R. H. (1931) “Economics of rural exchanges.” Telephony 101 (26 December): 36–37.Google Scholar
Bush, G. B. (1908) Letter to Bradley, E. C., 21 November, in “Rural telephone service,” Box 1363, A.T.& T. Historical Archives, New York.Google Scholar
California Public Utilities Commission, (1960) Special Study No. 448: “Development of telephone service in rural areas, 1944-1960.” Sacramento: State of California Archives.Google Scholar
Canada (1922–1940) Dominion Bureau of Statistics. “Telephone Statistics for 19.” Ottawa: Department of Trade and Commerce.Google Scholar
Card, F. W. (1912) “Cooperative fire insurance and telephone,” Cyclopedia of American Agriculture, Volume IV, 4th Edition. New York: MacMillan, 303–306.Google Scholar
Cashman, Tony. (1972) Singing Wires: The Telephone in Alberta. Edmonton: Alberta Government Telephone Commission.Google Scholar
Childs, M. (1952) The Farmer Takes a Hand: The Electric Power Revolution in Rural America. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Clement, E. A. (1977) The North Carolina Telephone Story. Raleigh: North Carolina Independent Telephone Association.Google Scholar
Coleman, C. M. (1952) , P. G. and , E. of California. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1977) A Voice from Afar: The History of Telecommunications in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Cook, R. D., and Weisberg, S. (1982) “Criticism and influence analysis in regression,” in Leinhardt, S. (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1982. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 313–361.Google Scholar
Cooke, M. L. (1925) “A note on rates for rural electric service.” The Annals 118 (March): 52–59.Google Scholar
Danielian, N. R. (1939) A T.& T: The Story of Industrial Conquest. New York: Vanguard.Google Scholar
Daubendiek, C. H. (c. 1946) “Fifty-two years of progress in the independent telephone industry,” Jefferson (IO) Telephone Company, photocopy at the Museum of Independent Telephony, Abilene, KA.Google Scholar
Davidson, A. G. (1938) “Serving Rural Subscribers in Fringe and Suburban Areas.” Telephony 115 (13 August): 11–13.Google Scholar
Doreian, P. (1981) “Estimating linear models with spatially distributed data,” in Leinhardt, S. (ed.) Sociological Methods 1981. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 359–388.Google Scholar
Dow, M. (1984) “A bi-parametric approach to autocorrelation.” Sociological Methods and Research 13 (November): 201–217.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981) Applied Regression Analysis, Second Ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. T. (1966) A Giant Step. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Evans, H. (1925) “The world’s experience with rural electrification.” The Annals 118 (March): 30–42.Google Scholar
Farrell, F. D. (1955) Kansas Rural Institutions: IX. Rural Telephone Company. Agriculture Experiment Station Circular No. 326. Manhattan, KA: Kansas State College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Federal Writers’ Project. (1939) These Are Our Lives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (1985) “Studying technology and social life,” in Castells, M. (Ed.), High Technology, Space, and Society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 284–301.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (1987) “The revolution in rural telephony.” Journal of Social History (In Press).Google Scholar
Fliegel, F. C., and Kivlin, J. E. (1966) “Attributes of innovations as factors in diffusion.” American Journal of Sociology 72 (November): 235–248.Google Scholar
Flink, J. J. (1970) American Adopts the Automobile, 1895-1910. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Fullarton, D. C., and Goss, F. D. [eds.] (1979) NTCA Our First 25 Years. Washington: National Telephone Cooperative Association.Google Scholar
Fuller, W. E. (1964) R.F.D.: The Changing Face of Rural America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, W. E. (1972) The American Mail: Enlarger of Common Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garnet, R. (1984) “The telephone enterprise: The evolution of the Bell system’s horizontal structure, 1876-1909.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Gary, T. (1928) “The independents and the industry.” Telephony 90 (March 13): 14–18.Google Scholar
Gray, W. F. (1924) “Typical schedules of rates for exchange service.” In Bell System General Commercial Engineers’ Conference, New York City. Microfilm 364B, Illinois Bell Historical, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hadwinger, D. F., and Cochran, C.. (1984) “Rural telephones in the United States.” Agricultural History 58 (July): 221–238.Google Scholar
Holland, J. D. (1938) “Telephone essential to progressive farm home,” Telephony 114 (19 February): 17–20.Google Scholar
Independent Telephone Association, Inc. (1945) “The farm telephone story.” Chicago: I.T.I, (photocopy from Museum of Independent Telephony, Abilene, KA).Google Scholar
Interrante, J. (1979) “You can’t go to town in a bathtub: Automobile movement and the reorganization of rural American space, 1900-1930.” Radical History Review 21 (Fall): 151–168.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., and Greenberg, D. F. (1981) Linear Panel Analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kyrk, H., Monroe, D. Brady, D. S. Rosenstiel, C., and Rainboth, E. D. (1941a) Family Expenditures For Housing and Household Operation. Five Regions. Consumer Purchases Study, Farm Series. Bureau of Home Economics. Misc. Pub. No. 457. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Kyrk, H., Monroe, D. Cronister, K., and Perry, M. (1941b) Family Expenditures For Housing and Household Operations. Five Regions. Consumer Purchase Study, Urban and Village Series. Misc. Pub. No. 432. Bureau of Home Economics. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Liparito, K. (1985) “A comparative analysis of the early history of the southern and northern telephone systems.” Business and Economic History, 2nd Ser., 14: 159–176.Google Scholar
MacMeal, H. B. (1934) The Story of Independent Telephony. Chicago: Independent Pioneer Telephone Association.Google Scholar
Mason, C. F. (1945) “America’s farm telephone program is well on its way.” Public Utilities Fortnightly 36 (2) 7–19, 85–98.Google Scholar
Mathias, P. (1934) “The rural telephone situation.” Telephony 107 (22 December): 8–11.Google Scholar
Mattingly, P. F., and Aspbury, G. (1985) “Some devolutional similarities diffusion.” Geografiska Annaler 67B (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
McDonald, F. (1957) Let There Be Light: The Electric Utility Industry in Wisconsin 1881-1955. Madison, wi: American History Research Center.Google Scholar
Melvin, B. L. (1931) The Sociology of a Village and Surrounding Territory. Bulletin No. 523, Ithaca, NY: New York State Agriculture Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Moline, N. T. (1971) Mobility and the Small Town, 1900-1930: Transportation Change in Oregon, Illinois. Department of Geography Research Paper No. 132. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Monroe, D., et al. (1941a) Family Income And Expenditures, Five Regions: Part 2 Family Expenditures. Consumer Purchases Study, Farm Services. Bureau of Home Economics. Misc. Pub. No. 465. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Monroe, D. (1941b) Family Expenditures For Automobile and Other Transportation. Five Regions. Consumer Purchases Study, Urban, Village, and Farm. Bureau of Home Economics, Misc. Pub. No. 415. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Mulrooney, J. B. (1937) “Some Aspects of Rural Telephone Service,” Telephony 112 (9 January): 14–16.Google Scholar
Nagel, J. and Nagel, . n.d. Talking Wires: The Story of North Dakota’s Telephone Cooperative. Aberdeen, ND: North Dakota Association of Telephone Cooperatives (photocopy at Museum of Independent Telephony, Abilene, KA).Google Scholar
Farmer, Ohio. (1927) “Have you a telephone problem?” (2 July): 3.Google Scholar
Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company. (1945) “Memorandum on F. C. C.’s report, ‘Preliminary Studies ...’ [1944].” In California P. U. C, 1960 [see above].Google Scholar
Page, A. W. (1941) The Bell Telephone System. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Parker, F. E. (1938) “Cooperative telephone association 1936,” Monthly Labor Review 46 (2) February): 392–413.Google Scholar
Patten, W. (1926) Pioneering the Telephone in Canada. Montreal: Telephone Pioneers.Google Scholar
Pegg, M. (1983) Broadcasting and Society, 1918-1939. London:,Croom-Helm.Google Scholar
People’s Mutual Telephone Company (1976) It’s For You: A History of People’s Mutual Company Co. Gretna, VA: People’s Mutual (copy in Museum of Independent Telephony, Abilene, KA).Google Scholar
Pike, R., and Mosco, V. (1986) “Canadian consumers and telephone pricing.” Telecommunications Policy (March): 17–32.Google Scholar
Pool, L. de S. (ed.) (1977) The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Pool, L. de S. (1983) Forecasting The Telephone. Norwood, NJ: Albex.Google Scholar
Rae, J. B. (1965) The American Automobile: A Brief History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rae, J. B. (1971) The Road and the Car in American Life. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Rakow, L. F. (1987) “Gender, communication, and technology: A case study of women and the telephone.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Renshaw, E. F. (1962) “Experience of the United States in bringing modern telephone service to unserved areas,” in Agency for International Development (ed.), Science, Technology and Development, Vol. 12: Communications. Washington, D.C.: National Technical Information Service: 67–81.Google Scholar
Reitz, K. P., and Dow, M. (1985) “AUTCOR: An autocorrelation regression package.” Orange, CA: Reitz, K. and Dow, M. (Chapman College).Google Scholar
Robertson, L. and Amstutz, K.. (1949) Telephone Problems in Rural Indiana. Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 548 (September). Lafayette, IN: Purdue.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, Third Ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rural Electrification Association. 1974. “Twenty-five years of progress: Rural telephone service USA.” Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sage, L. L. (1983) “Rural Iowa in the 1920s and 1930s: Roots of the farm depression.” Annals of Iowa, 3rd. Ser., 47 (Fall): 91–103.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R. G. Jr. (1951) “Farmers’ mutual telephone companies.” Journal of Farm Economics 33: I (February): 134–139.Google Scholar
Shenk, N. O. (1944) “Small exchanges struggle for survival.” Telephony 127 (October 7): 20–23; (November 11): 13–14; (December 9): 34–36.Google Scholar
Sichter, J. W. (1977) “Separations procedures in the telephone industry.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Program on Information Resources Policy Paper P-77-2.Google Scholar
Spasoff, I. M., and Beardsley, H. S. (1922) (rev. 1930). Farmers’ Telephone Companies: Organization, Financing and Management. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 1245. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Sullivan, G. D. (1931) “The farmer and his telephone.” Telephony 106 (6 June): 19–21.Google Scholar
Taylor, I. D. (1980) Telecommunications Demand. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Telephony (1933) “Rural rates and development factors.” 104 (3 June): 30–31.Google Scholar
Telephony (1935) “Telephone communication in Iowa.” 109 (2 November): 7–11.Google Scholar
Tomblein, R. L. (1931) “Population changes in small communities and in rural areas.” Bell Telephone Quarterly 10 (April): 115–123.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1906) Special Reports: Telephones and Telegraphs 1902. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1910) Special Reports: Telephones: 1907. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1915) Telephones and Telegraphs ... 1912. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1920) Census of Electrical Industries: 1917: Telephones. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1924) Census of Electrical Industries 1922: Telephones. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1930) Census of Electrical Industries 1927: Telephones. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1934) Census of Electrical Industries 1923: Telephones and Telegraphs. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1939) Census of Electrical Industries 1937: Telephones and Telegraphs. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1942) U.S. Census of Agriculture: 1940. Vol. II, General Reports. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1952) U.S. Census of Agriculture: 1950. Vol. II, General Reports. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau oí the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, 1790-1970. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (1945) Family Spending and Saving in Wartime. Bulletin No. 822. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Congressional Budget Office (1984) “Local telephone rates: Issues and alternatives.” Staff Working Paper (January). Washington: Congress of the United States.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (1938-1939) Income Parity for Agriculture, Part III, Prices Paid by Farmers for Commodities and Services. Section 2. Rates for Electricity for the Farm Home (Preliminary, September, 1938); Section 3. Telephone Rates to Farmers (Preliminary, December, 1938); Section 5. Index Numbers of Prices Paid by Farmers for Commodities (Preliminary, May, 1939). Washington: U. S. D. A.Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Communications Commission (1939) Investigation of the Telephone Industry: A Report of the F. C. C. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Communications Commission (1944) “Preliminary studies on some aspects of the availability of landline wire communications service”. (October) Accounting Statistical, and Tariff Department. Economics Division. Washington: F. C. C.Google Scholar
U.S. House (1949) “Rural telephones. Hearings.” The Committee on Agriculture. 81 st Congress. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1909) Report of the Country Life Commission. 60th Congress, 2nd Session, Senate Document 705. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1949) “Rural telephones. Hearings.” Committee on Agriculture and Forestry. 81st Congress. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
West, J. (C. Withers) (1945) Plainville, U.S.A. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Westrum, R. (1983) “What happened to the old sociology of technology?” Paper presented to the Society for Social Studies of Science, Blacksburg, VA. (November).Google Scholar
Wik, R. M. (1972) Henry Ford and Grass-Roots America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wik, R. M. (1977) “The radio in rural America during the 1920s.” Agricultural History 55 (October): 339–350.Google Scholar
Wilkenson, L. (1985) SYSTAT. Evanston, IL: Systat, Inc.Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1977) Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-Of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Wolman, L. (1929) “Consumption and the standard of living.” In President’s Conference on Unemployment, Recent Economics Changes in The United States. New York: McGraw-Hill: 13–76.Google Scholar
Wonbacher, G. F. (1908) “Proper development of the rural telephone.” Western Telephone Journal 12 (July): 242.Google Scholar
Woody, C. H. (1933) “The growth of governmental functions,” in President’s Commission on Recent Social Trends, Recent Social Trends. New York: McGraw-Hill: 1274-1330.Google Scholar