Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:25:19.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeking Female Sexual Emancipation and the Writing of Women's History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Elizabeth H. Pleck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of Louise Tilly's most widely cited articles was “Women's Work and European Fertility Patterns” (1976), coauthored with Joan Scott and Miriam Cohen. The subject of the article was a major increase in female illegitimacy at the time of the Industrial Revolution, which Tilly regarded as an instance of female vulnerability caused by isolation and urban migration. Surveys of recent writings by American and British historians about this subject suggest the impact of contemporary attitudes toward female sexual autonomy. This literature offers a far more positive portrait of the causes and consequences of female illegitimacy than Tilly provided.

Type
Special Section: Louise Tilly in Intergenerational Perspective
Information
Social Science History , Volume 38 , Issue 1-2 , Spring/Summer 2014 , pp. 105 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelove, Henry (1989) “Some speculations on the history of sexual intercourse during the long eighteenth century in England.” Genders 6 (3): 125–30.Google Scholar
Abrahamson, Mark (2000) “Case Studies of Surges in Nonmarital Births.” Marriage and Family Review 31 (1–2): 127–51.Google Scholar
Adair, Richard (1996) Courtship, Illegitimacy, and Marriage in Early Modern England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, George (1988) Family and The Female Life Course: The Women of Verviers, Belgium, 1849–1880. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Banner, James, and Gillis, John (2009) Becoming Historians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blaikie, Andrew (1998) “Scottish illegitimacy: Social adjustment or moral economy?” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29 (2): 221–41.Google Scholar
Evans, Tanya (2005) “‘Unfortunate objects’: London's unmarried mothers in the eighteenth century.” Gender and History 17 (1): 127–53.Google Scholar
Fairchilds, Cissie (1978) “Female sexual attitudes and the rise of illegitimacy: A case study.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8 (4): 627–67.Google Scholar
Frykman, Jonas (1975) “Sexual intercourse and social norms: A study of illegitimate births in Sweden, 1831–1933.” Ethnologia Scandinavica 5: 110–50.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Rachel G., and Moch, Leslie Page (1990) “Pregnant, single, and far from home: Migrant women in nineteenth-century Paris.” American Historical Review 95 (4): 1007–31.Google Scholar
Griffin, Emma (2012) “A conundrum resolved? Rethinking courtship, marriage and population growth in eighteenth-century England.” Past and Present 215 (1): 125–64.Google Scholar
Griffin, Emma (2013a) “Sex, illegitimacy and social change in industrializing Britain.” Social History 38 (2): 139–61.Google Scholar
Griffin, Emma (2013b) Liberty's Dawn: A People's History of the Industrial Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heywood, Colin (2007) “Innocence and experience: Sexuality among young people in modern France, c. 1750–1950.” French History 21 (1): 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim (1996) “Sex and gender: Redefining sex in eighteenth-century England.” History Workshop Journal (41): 72–90.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas (1993) “Sex and desire in the Industrial Revolution,” in O'Brien, Patrick and Quinault, Roland (eds.) The Industrial Revolution and British Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 100–123.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter (1980) “The bastardy-prone sub-society,” in Laslett, Peter, Oosterveen, Karla, and Smith, Richard M. (eds.) Bastardy and Its Comparative History. London: Arnold: 217–39.Google Scholar
Lee, W. R. (1977) “Bastardy and the socioeconomic structure of south Germany.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7 (3): 403–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, Alysa, Nutt, Thomas, and Williams, Samantha (2005) Illegitimacy in Britain, 1700–1920. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lyons, Clare A. (2006) Sex among the Rabble: An Intimate History of Gender and Power in the Age of Revolution, Philadelphia, 1730–1830. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Maynes, Mary Jo (1992) “Adolescent sexuality and social identity in French and German lower-class autobiography.” Journal of Family History 17 (4): 397–418.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Reto, Ryczkowzka, Grazyna, and Perroix, Olivier (2007) “Unwed mothers in the city: Illegitimate fertility in 19th century Geneva.” History of the Family 12 (3): 189–202.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (2014) “Writing Women, Work, and Family: The Tilly-Scott Collaboration.” Social Science History 38 (2): 113–20.Google Scholar
Scully, Pamela (2009) “Vulnerable Women: A critical reflection on human rights discourse and sexual violence.” Emory International Law Review 23 (1): 113–23.Google Scholar
Shorter, Edward (1973) “Female emancipation, birth control, and fertility in European history.” American Historical Review 78 (3): 605–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilly, Louise A, Scott, Joan W., and Cohen, Miriam (1976) “Women's work and European fertility patterns.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 6 (3): 447–76.Google Scholar
Tomasson, Richard F. (1976) “Premarital sexual permissiveness and illegitimacy in the Nordic countries.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 18 (2): 252–70.Google Scholar
Trumbach, Randolph (1998) Sex and the Gender Revolution, Volume 1: Heterosexuality and the Third Gender in Enlightenment London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, Jan (2001) “Family control, bridal pregnancy, and illegitimacy—An event history analysis in Leuven, Belgium, 1846–1856.” Social Science History 25 (3): 449–79.Google Scholar