Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:45:26.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relations Among Large American Corporations, 1904-1974

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Mark S. Mizruchi
Mark S. Mizruchi*
Affiliation:
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The period around the turn of the twentieth century has been called the “era of finance capital” in American history. It was during this period that the first of the great trusts were formed, combining in some cases hundreds of corporations into one. Investment bankers, in particular J. P. Morgan, were the major orchestrators of these schemes, but other leading financiers and industrialists were also active in controlling several corporations apiece. George F. Baker and James Stillman in banking; Edward H. Harriman, James J. Hill, and the Moore brothers in railroads; and John D. and William Rockefeller in oil and other industries were prominent among the leading capitalists of the age, and they dominated much of the business scene at that time.

One of the remarkable aspects of this period is the rare unanimity among scholars and journalists about its main characteristics. There is general agreement that financial corporations were the most powerful of the period, that a relatively small number of individuals dominated the corporate world, and that if it was ever possible to speak of a ruling class in American society, this was the period (e.g., Riesman, 1953; Bell, 1960; Parsons and Smelser, 1957).

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Spring 1983 , pp. 165 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank G. William Domhofffor his encouragement and advice.

References

Allen, F.L. (1935) The Lords of Creation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bavelas, A. (1950) “Communication patterns in task-oriented groups.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 57: 271–282.Google Scholar
Bearden, J., Atwood, W., Freitag, P., Hendricks, C., Mintz, B., and Schwartz, M. (1975) “The nature and extent of bank centrality in corporate networks.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1960) The End of Ideology. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bunting, D. and Barbour, J. (1971) “Interlocking directorates in large American corporations, 1896-1964.” Business History Review 45: 317–335.Google Scholar
Carosso, V.P. (1970) Investment Banking in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, T.C. and Miller, W. (1961) The Age of Enterprise. New York: Harper & Row. (Originally published, 1942.)Google Scholar
Collier, P. and Horowitz, D. (1976) The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Corey, L. (1930) The House of Morgan. New York: G. Howard Watt.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, P.F. (1951) The New Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Elias, C. (1973) The Dollar Barons. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galaskiewicz, J. (1979) Exchange Networks and Community Politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J.K. (1967) The New Industrial State. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Hopkins, T.K. (1964) The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups. Totawa, NJ: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Kotz, D.M. (1978) Bank Control of Large Corporations in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Larner, R.J. (1970) Management Control and the Large Corporation. New York: Dunellen.Google Scholar
Laumann, E.O. and Pappi, F.U. (1976) Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leavitt, H.J. (1951) “Some effects of certain communications patterns on group performance.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46: 38–50.Google Scholar
March, J.G. (1956) “Influence measurement in experimental and semi-experimental groups.” Sociometry 19: 260–271.Google Scholar
Mills, C.W. (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, B. and Schwartz, M. (1981) “Interlocking directorates and interest group formation.” American Sociological Review 46: 851–869.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. (1969) “The concept and use of social networks,” in Mitchell, J. (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester, England: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M.S. (1982) The American Corporate Network: 1904-1974. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M.S. and Bunting, D. (1981) “Influence in corporate networks: an examination of four measures.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 475–489.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. and Smelser, N. (1957) Economy and Society. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.Google Scholar
Perrucci, R. and Pilisuk, M. (1970) “Leaders and ruling elites: the interorganizational bases of community power.” American Sociological Review 35: 1040–1056.Google Scholar
Prewitt, K. and Stone, A. (1973) The Ruling Elites. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Riesman, D. (1953) The Lonely Crowd. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Rogers, D.L. and Maas, M.L. (1979) “Indicators of organizational power: a comparative analysis involving public and private organizations.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Sobel, R. (1965) The Big Board. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Strodtbeck, F.L. (1954) “The family as a three-person group,” American Sociological Review 19: 23–29.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P.M. (1941) “The decline of the investment banker.” Antioch Review 1:63–68.Google Scholar
Tnec [Temporary National Economic Committee] (1940) The Distribution of Ownership in the 200 Largest Nonfinancial Corporations. Monograph No. 29. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar