Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-tx7qf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-07T21:36:03.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives on Historical U.S. Census Undercounts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Miriam L. King  and
Diana L. Magnuson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are three sources of information about undercounts in nineteenth-century U.S. censuses: demographic analyses of net undercounts by age, sex, and race at the national level; record-linkage studies of gross undercounts for local communities; and contemporary testimony of the types and bases of underenumeration. This article reviews the strengths and limitations of each of these sources, assesses the extent of their agreement, and discusses the bases of their disagreement.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Winter 1995 , pp. 455 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, John W., and Kasakoff, Alice Bee (1991) “Estimates of census underenumeration based on genealogies.” Social Science History 15: 527-43.Google Scholar
Anderson, Margo (1988) The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Atlanta Constitution (1880a) “The Atlanta census.” 27 June, 4.3.Google Scholar
Atlanta Constitution (1880b) “The census enumerators of New York.” 23 June, 2.3.Google Scholar
Atlanta Constitution (1880c) “The count of heads.” 3 October, 1.4-5.Google Scholar
Baltimore Sun (1880a) “The census work in New York.” 7 June, suppl., 1.7.Google Scholar
Baltimore Sun (1880b) “Police aid in census taking.” 2 June, 4.5.Google Scholar
Baltimore Sun (1880c) “Progress of the census taking.” 3 June, 1.4.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Rives, Norfleet W. (1973) “A statistical reconstruction of the black population of the United States, 1880-1970.” Population Index 39: 3–36.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Zelnik, Melvin (1963) New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States: A Study of Annual White Births from 1855 to 1960 and of Completeness of Enumeration in the Censuses from 1880 to 1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DeBats, Donald A. (1991) “Hide and seek: The historian and nineteenth-century social accounting.” Social Science History 15: 545-63.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, Frank Jr., Strong, Douglas, and Crawford, Albert G. (1979) “What happened when the census was redone.” Sociology and Social Research 63: 475–505.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Caren A. (1988) “Estimates and correlates of enumeration completeness: Censuses and maps in nineteenth-century Massachusetts.” Social Science History 12: 71–86.Google Scholar
Handenberg, G. R. (1880) Letter of 23 April. National Archives, Record Group 48, Box 2, Entry 284.Google Scholar
King, Miriam L., and Magnuson, Diana L. (1993) “A procedural history of the enumeration process in the 1880 U.S. census, Appendix B,” in Ruggles, Steven and Menard, Russell (eds.) 1880 Public Use Sample. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Social History Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Knights, Peter R. (1991) “Potholes in the road of improvement? Estimating census under-enumeration by longitudinal tracing: U.S. censuses, 1850-1880.” Social Science History 15: 517-26.Google Scholar
Mason, Karen, and Cope, Lisa (1987) “Sources of age and date of birth misreporting in the 1900 census.” Demography 24: 563-73.Google Scholar
Minneapolis Tribune (1880) “The census.” 2 June, 7.4.Google Scholar
New York Times (1880a) “Census complaints.” 27 June, 6.5.Google Scholar
New York Times (1880b) “Chinese in California: Difficulty in counting.” 9 August, 2.2.Google Scholar
New York Times (1880c) “Enumerators’ experiences in New York City.” 5 June, 10.1.Google Scholar
New York Times (1880d) “Life on Baxter Street.” 15 June, 8.3.Google Scholar
Parkerson, Donald H. (1985) “How mobile were nineteenth-century Americans?” Historical Methods 18: 5–12.Google Scholar
Parkerson, Donald H. (1991) “Comments on the underenumeration of the U.S. census, 1850-1880.“ Social Science History 15: 509-15.Google Scholar
Philadelphia Public Ledger (1880) “Progress of the census.” 28 June, 1.6.Google Scholar
Porter, R. (1892) Compendium of the Eleventh Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Riche, Martha (1993) “The Riche Report: A new kind of census?” Population Today 21: 3.Google Scholar
Robey, Bryant (1989) “The 1990 U.S. census: How good is good enough?” Asia and Pacific Forum 3: 5.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. Gregory, (1988) “Perspectives on the completeness of coverage of population in the United States decennial censuses.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America.Google Scholar
San Francisco Chronicle (1880a) “The census.” 8 June, 3.4.Google Scholar
San Francisco Chronicle (1880b) “The Chinese census.” 29 May, 3.4.Google Scholar
San Francisco Chronicle (1880c) “The proposed Chinese census.” 7 May, 2.1.Google Scholar
San Francisco Chronicle (1880d) “Taking the census.” 12 June, 2.2.Google Scholar
Schenker, Nathaniel, ed. (1993) “Undercount in 1990 census.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:1044–1166.Google Scholar
St. Louis Post Dispatch (1880a) “The New York census.” 24 June, 2.1.Google Scholar
St. Louis Post Dispatch (1880b) “Taking the census.” 14 June, 8.1.Google Scholar
St. Paul Pioneer Press (1880) “St. Paul's population.” 30 September, 7.3.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. (1988) “Census matching and migration: A research strategy.” Historical Methods 21: 52–60.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. (1991) “The quality of census data for historical inquiry: A research agenda.“ Social Science History 15: 579-99.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1880) Instructions to Enumerators. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. House (1878) Report of Superintendent of Census. 45th Cong., 3d sess. H. Exec. Doc. 1.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1878) Interview with Superintendent of Census by Joint Committee on Provisions for Taking Tenth Census. 45th Cong., 3d sess. S. Misc. Doc. 26.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1881) Letter from Secretary of the Interior. 46th Cong., 3d sess. S. Exec. Doc. 28.Google Scholar
Walker, Francis A. (1870) Compendium of the Ninth Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Walker, Francis A. (1880) Letter to the Secretary of State, 18 June. National Archives, Record Group 48, Box 2, Entry 284.Google Scholar
Washington Post (1880) “The Carolina census.” 1 September, 4.1.Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll D, and Hunt, William C. (1900) The History and Growth of the United States Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar