Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:22:39.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterns of Radicalization in Political Activism

An Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Extract

Research on political violence occurs in waves, generally corresponding to the successive swells of violence that in many ways define modern society. Critically, this violence is characterized as much by diversity as by uniformity. As each new spate in research on political violence has shown us, rarely can we generalize about either the aims or the repertoires of action of the purveyors of violence. Some similar mechanisms are in play, however, as violence develops from political conflicts between states and their opponents.

This suggestion comes from social movement studies, whose influence is increasing in the analysis of political violence. These studies developed especially from a critique of ‘terrorism studies,’ which emerged within security studies as a branch of international relations and have traditionally been more oriented toward developing antiterrorist policies than toward a social scientific understanding of political violence.

Type
Special Section: Cultures of Radicalization: Discourse and Practices of Political Violence and Terrorism
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breen Smyth, Marie (2007) “A critical research agenda for the study of political terror.” European Political Science 6 (3): 260–67.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha (2010) Explaining Terrorism: Causes, Processes, and Consequences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella (1995) Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander (1991) “The discipline of terrorology,” in George, Alexander (ed.) Western State Terrorism. Cambridge: Polity: 76101.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff (2004) “What must we explain to explain terrorism?Social Movement Studies 3 (2): 259–65.Google Scholar
Gunning, Jeroen (2009) “Social movement theory and the study of terrorism,” in Jackson, RichardSmyth, Marie BreenGunning, Jeroen (eds.) Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda. London: Routledge: 156–78.Google Scholar
Horgan, John (2005) “The social and psychological characteristics of terrorism and terrorists,” in Bjorgo, Tore (ed.) Root Causes of Terrorism: Myths, Reality, and Ways Forward. London: Routledge: 4453.Google Scholar
Jackson, RichardSmyth, Marie BreenGunning, Jeroen, eds. (2009) “Introduction: The case for critical terrorism studies,” in Jackson, RichardSmyth, Marie BreenGunning, Jeroen (eds.) Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda. London: Routledge: 19.Google Scholar
Ranstorp, Magnus (2009) “Mapping terrorism studies after 9/11,” in Jackson, RichardSmyth, Marie BreenGunning, Jeroen (eds.) Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda. London: Routledge: 1333.Google Scholar
Schmid, Alex P.Jongman, Albert J. (1988) Political Terrorism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Silke, Andrew (2003) “Preface,” in Silke, Andrew (ed.) Terrorists, Victims, and Society: Psychological Perspectives on Terrorism and Its Consequences. Chichester: Wiley: xvxxi.Google Scholar
Waldmann, Peter (2007) Guerra civil, terrorismo y anomia social: El caso colombiano en un contexto globalizado. Bogotá: Norma.Google Scholar
Wiktorowicz, Quentin (2004) “Islamic activism in social movement theory,” in Wiktorowicz, Quentin (ed.) Islamic Activism: A Social Movement Theory Approach. Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 133.Google Scholar