Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:59:21.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of Unemployment Insurance in Britain

A Cross-Class Alliance Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Timothy T. Hellwig
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Britain’s 1911 National Insurance Act ranks as the world’s first compulsory program of unemployment insurance and was a key element of the Liberal government’s reforms. Yet by failing to incorporate differences in actor preferences toward insurance, existing theories of social policy origins provide incomplete explanations for its timing and scope. The objective of this article is to improve on accounts of the 1911 unemployment insurance scheme using a cross-class alliance approach. It argues that employers and workers in capital-intensive trades formed an alliance in support of the scheme, whereas their counterparts in relatively labor-intensive trades were unable to strike a similar bargain. Unlike other frameworks, this approach is amenable to explaining why the unemployment scheme was designed as a contributory system that excluded many trades. The study’s findings carry implications for social historians, political economists, and sociologists alike.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , spring 2005 , pp. 107 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, W. J (1911) “The National Insurance Bill. Part II: Unemployment.” Economic Journal 21: 266–74.Google Scholar
Askwith, G. R. (1920) Industrial Problems and Disputes. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Beveridge, W. H. (1953) “Foreign schemes of unemployment insurance before 1908,” in Power and Influence. London: Hodder and Stoughton:371.Google Scholar
Block, F. (1977) “The ruling class does not rule: Notes on the Marxist theory of the state.” Socialist Revolution 33:6–28.Google Scholar
Board of Trade, Great Britain (1910) Report on Collective Agreements between Employers and Workpeople in the United Kingdom. Parliament Papers by Command No. 5366. London: Darling and Son.Google Scholar
Board of Trade, Great Britain (1912) Report on Strikes and Lockouts and Conciliation and Arbitration Boards in the United Kingdom in 1912.Parliament Papers by Command No. 7089. London: Darling and Son.Google Scholar
Bruce, M. (1961) The Coming of the Welfare State. London: B. T. Batsford.Google Scholar
Bruce, M. ed. (1973) The Rise of the Welfare State. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L., and Driffill, J. (1988) “Bargaining structure, corporatism, and macroeconomic performance.” Economic Policy 6:13–61.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R. (1978) “The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis.” American Political Science Review 72:1243–61.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. J. (1996) “Payment and participation: Welfare and state-formation in Britain 1900-1951.”Past and Present 150:169–216.Google Scholar
Deane, P., and Cole, W. A. (1962) British Economic Growth 1688-1959. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G., and Friedland, R. (1982)“Class coalitions in the making of West European economies.”Political Power and Social Theory 3:1–52.Google Scholar
Flanders, A. (1954) “Collective bargaining,” in Flanders, A. and Clegg, H. A. (eds.) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain. Oxford: Basil Blackwell:252–322.Google Scholar
Flora, P., and Alber, J. (1981) “Modernization, democratization, and the development of welfare states in Western Europe,” in Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A. J. (eds.) The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. London: Transaction: 37–80.Google Scholar
Flora, P., Klaus, F., and Pfenning, W. (1987)State, Economy, and Society in Western Europe, 1815-1975. Vol.2. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Gibbon, I. G. (1910) “Compulsory insurance against unemployment.” Economic Journal 20: 172–81.Google Scholar
Gilbert, B. B. (1966) “Winston Churchill versus the Webbs: The origins of British unemployment insurance.”American Historical Review 71:846–62.Google Scholar
Great Britain Census Office (1915) Census of England and Wales, 1911; Summary Tables. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001)Varieties of Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. (1998) “Trade and social insurance: The development of national unemployment insurance in advanced industrial democracies.” PhD diss., University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1972) Unemployment and Politics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, J. R. (1975) The Origins of the Liberal Welfare Reforms, 1906-1914. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hay, J. R. (1977) “Employers and social policy in Britain: The evolution of welfare legislation, 1905-14.” Social History 2:435–55.Google Scholar
Hay, J. R. (1981) “The British business community, social insurance and the German example,” in Mommsen, W. J. (ed.)The Emergence of the Welfare State in Britain and Germany, 1850-1950. London: Croom Helm:107–32.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1974) Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. M. (1999) Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. M., Misra, J., and Ng, T. N. (1995) “The programmatic emergence of the social security state.” American Sociological Review 60:329–49.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1949) “General labour unions in Britain, 1850-1914.” Economic History Review 1: 123–42.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1977) “Recent theories of the capitalist state.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 1: 353–73.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985) Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lennard, R. (1911) “The government’s scheme for insurance against unemployment.” Economic Journal 21: 335–45.Google Scholar
Macara, C. (1921) Recollections. London: Cassell and Co.Google Scholar
Mackie, T. T., and Rose, R. (1991) The International Almanac of Electoral History. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1993) The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 2, The Rise of Classes and Nation States, 1760-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, I. (2000) “Strategic alliances and social policy reform: Unemployment insurance in comparative perspective.”Politics and Society 28:223–44.Google Scholar
Mathias, P. (1969) The First Industrial Nation: An Economic History of Britain, 1700-1914. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Melling, J. (1991) “Industrial capitalism and the welfare of the state: The role of employers in the comparative development of welfare states.” Sociology 25:219–39.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1988) British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mommsen, W. J. (ed.) (1981) The Emergence of the Welfare State in Britain and Germany. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S., and Skocpol, T. (1984) “Why not equal protection? Explaining the politics of public social spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880s-1920.” American Sociological Review 49:726–50.Google Scholar
Pelling, H. M. (1963) A History of British Trade Unionism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pelling, H. M. (1968) Popular Politics and Society in Late Victorian Britain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pierson, P., ed. (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1985) Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. F. (1913) The Spirit of Association. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress, Great Britain (1909) Majority Report. Parliament Papers by Command No. 4499. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1935) Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Sherman, P. T. (1931) Some Comments on Unemployment Insurance. New York: National Civic Federation.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. D. (1979) The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Swenson, P. (1991) “Bringing capital back in, or social democracy reconsidered.” World Politics 43: 513–44.Google Scholar
Swenson, P. (1997) “Arranged alliance: Business interests in the New Deal.” Politics and Society 25: 66–116.Google Scholar
Swenson, P. (2001) Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thane, P. (1984) “The working class and state‘welfare’ in Britain, 1880-1914.” Historical Journal 27: 877–900.Google Scholar
Valocchi, S. (1989) “The relative autonomy of the state and the origins of British welfare policy.”Sociological Forum 3:349–65.Google Scholar
Weir, M., and Skocpol, T. (1985) “State structures and the possibilities of ‘Keynesian’ responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States,” in Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T. (eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:107–63.Google Scholar