Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:38:51.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizing Powers in Eventful Times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2015

Elisabeth S. Clemens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Historical and social scientific explanations often rely on major happenings and crises to define the topics of our inquiries or to delineate historical periods. But these models often prove limited and problematic. The challenge is to understand how action unfolds in a crisis and, in the process, reconfigures resources, opportunities, and horizons of possibility for new lines of strategic response. These questions are addressed through a comparison of Herbert Hoover and Harry Hopkins as they dealt with the onset of the Great Depression. Both men had the skills, network ties, and reputational resources that figure centrally in models of effective agency, but the contemporary assessments of their efforts differed dramatically. This pair of lives—Hoover and Hopkins—permits a cross-sectional comparison as both men wrestled with the onset of economic collapse and a sequential comparison as Hopkins inherited responsibility for relieving a crisis that had been shaped and reshaped by Hoover's actions.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Social Science History , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew (2001) Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Edith (1936) “Review of Spending to Save: The complete story of relief by Harry L. Hopkins.” Social Service Review 10 (4): 684–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Julia (1996) “Principals and agents, colonialists and company men: The decay of colonial control in the Dutch East Indies.” American Sociological Review 61 (1): 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, Brian (2003) “‘Mirrors of desires’: Interest groups, elections, and the targeted style in twentieth-century America,” in Jacobs, Meg, Novak, William J., and Zelize, Julian E. (eds.) The Democratic Experiment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 222–49.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian (2009) A Government Out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, Gerald (2009) Louis D. Brandeis and the Making of Regulated Competition, 1900–1932. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, and Verdery, Katherine, eds. (1999) Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Burner, David (1979) Herbert Hoover: A Public Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig (2004) “A world of emergencies: Fear, intervention, and the limits of cosmopolitan order.” Canadian Review of Sociology 14 (4): 373–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapper, Raymond (1937) “Who is Hopkins?” The Forum (December): 283–87.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (1993) “Organizational repertoires and institutional change: Women's groups and the transformation of American politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (4): 755–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (1997) The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (2006) “Logics of history? Agency, multiplicity, and incoherence in the explanation of change,” in Adams, Julia, Clemens, Elisabeth S., and Orloff, Ann Shola (eds.) Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 493–516.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (2010a) “In the shadow of the New Deal: Reconfiguring the roles of government and charity, 1928–1940,” in Clemens, Elisabeth and Guthrie, Doug (eds.) Politics and Partnerships: Voluntary Associations in America's Political Past and Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 79–120.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (2010b) “From city club to nation state: Business networks in American political development.” Theory and Society 39 (3–4): 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis (1955) The Old Regime and the French Revolution. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis (2004) Democracy in America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Dulles, Foster Rhea (1950) The American Red Cross. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Evans, Rhonda, and Kay, Tamara (2008) “How environmentalists ‘greened’ trade policy: Strategic action and the architecture of field overlap.” American Sociological Review 73 (6): 970–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, Neil (2001) “Social skill and the theory of fields.” Sociological Theory 19 (2): 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, Roger, and Alford, Robert (1991) “Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions,” in Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 232–63.Google Scholar
Ganz, Marshall (2000) “Resources and resourcefulness: Strategic capacity in the unionization of California agriculture, 1959–1966.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (4): 1003–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Go, Julian (2008) American Empire and the Politics of Meaning: Elite Political Cultures in the Philippines and Puerto Rico during U.S. Colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David E. (1982) “Herbert Hoover and the great drought of 1930.” Journal of American History 68 (4): 850–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W. (1974) “Herbert Hoover, the commerce secretariat, and the vision of an ‘associative state,’ 1921–28.” Journal of American History 61 (1): 116–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W. (1998) “Herbert Hoover, associationalism, and the Great Depression relief crisis of 1930–1933,” in Critchlow, Donald T. and Parker, Charles H. (eds.) With Us Always: A History of Private Charity and Public Welfare. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Hayes, Erving Paul (1936) Activities of the President's Emergency Committee for Employment. Concord, NH: The Rumford Press.Google Scholar
Hijaya, James A. (1980) “Four ways of looking at a philanthropist: A study of Robert Weeks de Forest.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124 (6): 404–18.Google Scholar
Hoover, Herbert (1952) The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover. London: Hollis and Carter Google Scholar
Hopkins, Harry L. (1936) Spending to Save: The Complete Story of Relief. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hopkins, June (1999) Harry Hopkins: Sudden Hero, Brash Reformer. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Lynn (1984) Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, and Perrow, Charles (1977) “Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972).” American Sociological Review 42 (2): 249–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira (2002) “Flexible capacity: The military and early American state-building,” in Katznelson, Ira and Shefter, Martin (eds.) Shaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 82–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David M. (2005) Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzman, Paul A. (1974) Harry Hopkins and the New Deal. Fairlawn, NJ: R. E. Burdick.Google Scholar
Lowitt, Richard, and Beasley, Maurine, eds. (1981) One Third of a Nation: Lorena Hickok Reports on the Great Depression. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1986) The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne (1998) Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Andrew (2009) The Limits of Voluntarism: Charity and Welfare from the New Deal through the Great Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, James T. (1935) “Home service and its social value” (April 9), 7. NARA, ARC, RGIII, Box 8, 929.1801 News Releases, #44765-7752, 1935–36.Google Scholar
Olson, James S. (1972) “Gifford Pinchot and the politics of hunger, 1932–1933.” The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 96 (4): 508–20.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola (1993) The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880–1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Ansell, Christopher K. (1993) “Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (6): 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, John F., and McLean, Paul D. (2006) “Organizational invention and elite transformation: The birth of partnership systems in Renaissance Florence.” American Journal of Sociology 111 (5): 1463–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Powell, Walter W. (2013) The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, John Barton (1929) “The obligations of leadership in the Red Cross.” Red Cross Courier, September 2, 7.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul (2000) “Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinchot, Gifford (1927) “The State, the Nation, and the People’s Needs.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 129: 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadagno, Jill S. (1994) The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, David L. (2013) The Hopkins Touch: Harry Hopkins and the Forging of the Alliance to Defeat Hitler. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiberg, Marc (2007) “What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity, and the problem of institutional change in the U.S. economy, 1900–1950.” Socio-Economic Review 5 (1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr., (1993) “A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. (2005) Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheingate, Adam D. (2003) “Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development.” Studies in American Political Development 17 (2): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwood, Robert E. (1950) Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Lipsky, Michael (1993) Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in an Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, Bartholomew H. (1996) From the Outside In: World War II on the American State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, James T. (2011) Warfare State: World War II Americans and the Age of Big Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
“State Relief Needs Stressed by Hopkins” (1932) New York Times, October 21.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Steinmo, Sven (1992) “Historical institutionalism in comparative politics,” in Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank (eds.) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press: 1–32.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1995) Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trinitapoli, Jenny, and Weinreb, Alexander (2012) Religion and AIDS in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugwell, Rexford G. (1965) “Transition: Hoover to Roosevelt, 1932–1933.” The Centennial Review 9 (2): 160–91.Google Scholar
Viterna, Jocelyn (2013) Women in War: The Micro-processes of Mobilization in El Salvador. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Voters Urged to Aid Relief Bond Issue” (1932) New York Times, November 7.Google Scholar
Walker, Sydnor H. (1933) “Privately supported social work,” in Mitchell, Wesley Clair (ed.) Recent Social Trends in the United States: Report of the President's Research Committee on Social Trends. Vol. 2. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal (2008) “Rahm Emanuel on the Opportunity of Crisis,” www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mzcbXi1Tkk (accessed June 24, 2015).Google Scholar
Warren, Robert Penn (1946) All the King's Men. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Waugh, Joan (2001) “‘Give this man work!’ Josephine Shaw Lowell, the Charity Organization Society of the city of New York, and the depression of 1893.” Social Science History 25 (2): 217–46.Google Scholar
Wilson, Joan Hoff (1975) Herbert Hoover: Forgotten Progressive. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Woodruff, Nan Elizabeth (1985) As Rare as Rain: Federal Relief in the Great Southern Drought of 1930–31. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar