Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:50:34.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motives and Alignments

Response to Kimeldorf’s, Adut’s, and Hall’s Comments on Ruling Oneself Out

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Ivan Ermakoff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Drawing on multiple perspectives and different analytic takes, Howard Kimeldorf ’s, Ari Adut’s, and John R. Hall’s comments raise three broad issues at the center of the agenda laid out in Ruling Oneself Out. The first issue concerns the motivational underpinnings of decisions reached in conditions of high uncertainty. The second draws the focus on the logic of the argument and its possible connections with models of organizational behaviors. The third points to the explanatory scope of the theory and the indeterminacy of the processes at play. In this article I address these critical remarks and, along the way, stake out claims and implications.

An argument about decisions cannot avoid delving into motivations and subjective perceptions. Several of Ari Adut’s and Howard Kimeldorf ’s comments focus on this issue. Adut draws attention to the possible effects of coercive pressures and pervasive expectations of retaliation in July 1940. In addition, his comments suggest that we should not downplay the significance of opportunism as a motive for endorsement.

Type
Special Section: Politics, Collective Uncertainty, and the Renunciation of Power
Information
Social Science History , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 97 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, Masahiko (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6867.001.0001Google Scholar
Blum, Léon (1955) L’oeuvre de Léon Blum: Mémoires; La prison et le procès; A l’échelle humaine, 1940–1945. Paris: Michel.Google Scholar
Buchwitz, Otto (1950) Fünfzig Jahre Funktionär der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung. East Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall L. (1992) “Leadership and its basis in problems of social coordination.” International Political Science Review 13: 7–24.Google Scholar
Cointet, Michèle (1993) Vichy Capitale, 1940–1944. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar
Ermakoff, Ivan (2001) “Strukturelle Zwänge und zufällige Geschehnisse.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft, special issue, 19: 224–56.Google Scholar
Felder, Josef (1982) “Mein Weg: Buchdrucker—Journalist—SPD Politiker,” in Abgeordnete des Deutschen Bundestages: Aufzeichnungen und Erinnerungen, vol. 1. Boppard: Boldt: 15–79.Google Scholar
Galimand, Lucien (1948) Vive Pétain! Vive de Gaulle! Paris: Couronne.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark (1978) “Threshold models of collective behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 1420–43.10.1086/226707Google Scholar
Hall, John R. (1999) Cultures of Inquiry: From Epistemology to Discourse in Sociohistorical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoegner, Wilhelm (1959) Der schwierige Außenseiter: Erinnerungen eines Abgeordneten, Emigranten und Ministerpräsidenten. Munich: Isar.Google Scholar
Hoegner, Wilhelm (1978) Flucht vor Hitler: Erinnerungen an die Kapitulation der Ersten Deutschen Republik. Munich: Nymphenburger Verlaganstalt.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary J. (1994) Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morsey, Rudolf (1977) Der Untergang des politischen Katholizismus: Die Zentrumspartei zwischen christlichem Selbstverständnis und “Nationaler Erhebung,” 1932–33. Stuttgart: Belser.Google Scholar
Nachlaß August Wegmann (1933) Archiv für Christlich-Demokratische Politik, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (ACDP), Sankt-Augustin, Germany.Google Scholar