Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:52:59.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Military Technology and Sample Selection Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2020

Johan Fourie Open the ORCID record for Johan Fourie [Opens in a new window] ,
Kris Inwood Open the ORCID record for Kris Inwood [Opens in a new window]  and
Martine Mariotti Open the ORCID record for Martine Mariotti [Opens in a new window]
Johan Fourie*
Affiliation:
LEAP, Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University
Kris Inwood
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Guelph University
Martine Mariotti
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Australian National University Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Military enlistment is highly selective for reasons of both labor demand and supply. An early-twentieth-century evolution of military technology that shifted the demand for workers of different stature illustrates the importance of labor demand beyond the commonly discussed influences originating with labor supply. English-born soldiers in the Anglo-Boer War (1899–1902) were taller, on average, than those of World War I (1914–18), yet these differences cannot be attributed to standard of living or business cycle influences on the labor market. Rather, we argue, the mechanization and bureaucratization of warfare increased the relative value of shorter people permitting a decline in the average height of soldiers. Technological change over the period of these two wars affected labor demand in a way that must be recognized before using this evidence to test hypotheses about changes in population health.

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 44 , Special Issue 3: Selection Bias and Social Science History , Fall 2020 , pp. 485 - 500
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A’Hearn, B. (2004) “A restricted maximum likelihood estimator for truncated height samples.” Economics and Human Biology (2): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badsey, S. (2007) “The Boer War (1899–1902) and British Cavalry doctrine: A re-evaluation.” Journal of Military History (71): 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R., Hatton, T., and Inwood, K. (2016) “Health, height and the household at the turn of the 20th century.” Economic History Review (69): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, H., Guinanne, T., and Mroz, T. (2017) “Sample-selection biases and the industrialization puzzle.” Journal of Economic History (77): 171–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, H., Guinanne, T., and Mroz, T. (2019) “Diagnosing sample-selection bias in historical heights: A reply to Komlos and A’Hearn.” Journal of Economic History (79): 1154–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, M. (2006) War Made New: Technology, Warfare and the Course of History, 1500 to Today. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
Boshoff, W. H., and Fourie, J. (2020) “The South African economy in the twentieth century,” in Boshoff, Willem H. (ed.) Business Cycles and Structural Change in South Africa: An Integrated View. New York: Springer: 49–70.Google Scholar
Castaldi, C., Fontana, R., and Nuvolari, A. (2009) “‘Chariots of fire’: The evolution of tank technology, 1915–1945.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics (19): 545–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A.D. Jr. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, A.D. Jr. (1977) The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap.Google Scholar
Citino, R. (2002) Decisive Victory: From Stalemate to Blitzkrieg in Europe, 1899–1940. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, N., Cranfield, J., and Inwood, K. (2014) “Fighting fit? Diet, disease, and disability in the Canadian Expeditionary Force, 1914–18.” War and Society (33): 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., and Mills, Terence C. (1994) “Trends in real wages in Britain, 1750–1813.” Explorations in Economic History (31): 176–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, J., and Inwood, K. (2015) “A tale of two armies: Australian and Canadian soldiers in World War One.” Australian Economic History Review (55): 212–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourie, J., Grundlingh, A., and Mariotti, M. (2017) “‘Poor South Africa! Will no nice English people ever come out here?’—The South African Constabulary of the Anglo-Boer War.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History (45): 580–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundlingh, A. (1991) “‘Protectors and friends of the people’? The South African Constabulary in the Transvaal and Orange River Colony, 1900–1908,” in Andereson, M. D. and Killingray, D. (eds.) Policing the Empire: Government, Authority and Control, 1830–1940. Manchester: Manchester University Press: 168–82.Google Scholar
Haig, B. (2001) “New estimates of Australian GDP: 1861–1948/49.” Australian Economic History Review (41): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, M. R. (2004) “Growing incomes, shrinking people: Can economic development be hazardous to your health?” Social Science History (28): 249–70.Google Scholar
Inwood, K., and Masakure, O. (2013) “Poverty and physical well-being among the coloured population in South Africa.” Economic History of Developing Regions (28) 56–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, J. (1998) “Shrinking in a growing economy? The mystery of physical stature during the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History (58): 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, J. (2004) “How to (and how not to) analyze deficient height samples: An introduction.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History (37): 160–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, J., and A’Hearn, B. (2019) “Clarifications of a puzzle: The decline in nutritional status at the onset of modern economic growth in the United States.” Journal of Economic History (79): 1129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krusell, P., Ohanian, L. E., Ríos-Rull, J. V., and Violante, G. L. (2000) “Capital-skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis” Econometrica 68(5): 1029–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liaropoulos, A. N. (2006) “Revolutions in warfare: Theoretical paradigms and historical evidence: The Napoleonic and First World War revolutions in military affairs.” Journal of Military History (70): 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, I. W., and Pincus, J. (1983) “Did Australian living standards stagnate between 1890 and 1940?” Journal of Economic History (43): 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mironov, B., and A’Hearn, B. (2008) “Russian living standards under the tsars: Anthropometric evidence from the Volga.” Journal of Economic History (68): 900–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, G. (2007) “Scapegoat arm: Twentieth-century cavalry in anglophone historiography.” Journal of Military History (71): 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudzens, G. (1990) “War-winning weapons: The measurement of technological determinism in military history.” Journal of Military History (54): 403–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safarian, A. E. (1970) The Canadian Economy in the Great Depression. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Shlomowitz, R. (2007) “Did the mean height of Australian-born men decline in the late nineteenth century? A comment.” Economics and Human Biology (5): 484–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steckel, R. H. (1995) “Stature and the standard of living.” Journal of Economic Literature (33): 1903–40.Google Scholar
Swart, S. (2010) “Horses in the South African War, c. 1899–1902.” Society and Animals (18): 348–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urquhart, M. C. (1993) Gross national product, Canada 1879–1927. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, M., Maas, I., and Miles, A. (2004) “Creating a historical international standard classification of occupations: An exercise in multinational interdisciplinary cooperation.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History (37): 186–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimran, A. (2019) “Sample-selection bias and height trends in the nineteenth-century United States.” Journal of Economic History (79): 99–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Fourie et al. supplementary material

Fourie et al. supplementary material

Download Fourie et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 112.1 KB