No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Marketable Farm Surpluses: Northeastern and Midwestern United States, 1859 and 1860
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Extract
This article examines the extent of the potential market surplus by geographic region in the northern United States from Vermont to Minnesota on the eve of the Civil War. Our interest is in measuring the extensiveness and pervasiveness of market commitment, how dependent it was upon the transport system, and at what stage in the settlement life cycle it emerged. This study is designed to complement a similar one by McInnis (1984) for the area just north of the American border, an area then known as Canada West.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 1984
References
Atack, J. and Bateman, F. (1984) “Self-sufficiency and marketable surplus in the rural North, 1860.” Agricultural History.Google Scholar
Atack, J. and Bateman, F. (1983) American Agriculture in the Antebellum North. University of Illinois and Indiana University, (unpublished)Google Scholar
Bateman, F. and Foust, J. (1974) “A sample of rural households selected from the tive analysis.” J. of Econ. History 28 (June): 255–273.Google Scholar
Bateman, F. and Foust, J. (1974) “A sample of rural household selected from the 1860 manuscript censuses.” Agricultural History 48 (January): 75–93.Google Scholar
Battalio, R. C. and Kagel, J. (1970) “The structure of antebellum southern agriculture: South Carolina, a case study.” Agricultural History 44 (January): 25–37.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. K. and Pierce, R. (1961) “Changes in the American national diet, 1879-1959.” Food Research Institute Studies 2 (May): 95–119.Google Scholar
Berry, T. S. (1943) Western Prices before 1861: A Study of the Cincinnati Market. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, C. and Hutchinson, W. (1980) “Antebellum interregional trade in agricultural goods: preliminary results.” J. of Econ. History 40 (March): 25–31.Google Scholar
Danhof, C. (1979) “The farm enterprise: the northern United States, 1820-1860s.” Research in Econ. History 4: 127–191.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. (1961). ”Regional income trends, 1840-1950,” pp. 525–547 in Harris, S. (ed.) American Economic History. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gallman, R. (1970) “Self-sufficiency of the cotton economy of the antebellum South.” Agricultural History 44 (January): 5–24.Google Scholar
Henretta, J. A. (1978) “Families and farms: mentalité in pre-industrial America.” William and Mary Q. 3rd Series, 35 (January): 3–32.Google Scholar
Herbst, L. A. (1975) “Interregional commodity trade from the North to South, and American economic development in the antebellum period.” J. of Econ. History 35 (March): 264–270Google Scholar
Hutchinson, W. K. and Williamson, S. (1971) “The self-sufficiency of the antebellum South: estimate of the food supply.” J. of Econ. History 31 (September): 591–609.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, D. L. (1949) “The pre-Civil War South’s leading crop: corn.” Agricultural History 23: 236–239.Google Scholar
Lemon, J. T. (1980a) “Comment on James A. Henretta’s ‘Families and Farms: Mentalité in Pre-Industrial America’.” William and Mary Q. 3rd. Series, 37 (October): 688–696.Google Scholar
Lemon, J. T. (1980b) “Early Americans and their social environment.” J. of Historical Geo graphy 6 (April): 115–131.Google Scholar
Lemon, J. T. (1972) The Best Poor Man’s Country. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lemon, J. T. (1967) “Household consumption in eighteenth century America and its relation ship to production and trade: the situation among farmers in southeastern Pennsylva nia.” Agricultural History 41 (January): 59–70.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, D. (1970) “Southern dependence upon interregional grain supplies: a review of the trade flows.” Agricultural History 44 (January): 101–114.Google Scholar
Lloyd, W. A., Falconer, J., and Thorne, C. (1918) “Agriculture of Ohio.” Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 326. Wooster, OH.Google Scholar
McMahon, S. F. (1980) “‘Provisions laid up for the family’: towards a history of diet in New England, 1650-1850.” Brandeis University, (unpublished)Google Scholar
Minnesota Commissioner of Statistics (1860) Minnesota: Its Place Among the States Being the First Annual Report of. . . Hartford: Case, Lockwood.Google Scholar
Primack, M. L. (1966) “Farm capital formation as a use of farm labor in the United States, 1850-1910.” J. of Econ. History 26 (September): 348–362.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, W. C. (1981) “The market and Massachusetts farmers, 1750-1855.” J. of Econ. History 41 (June): 283–314.Google Scholar
Sutch, R. (1976) “Care and feeding of slaves,” pp. 231–301 in David, P. et al., Reckoning with Slavery. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Utter, W.T. (1942) The Frontier State 1803-1825. Columbus: Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Patents (1844-56) Annual Reports, Vol. II, Agriculture. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Labor. (1904) Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor. 1903. Cost of Living and Retail Prices of Food. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Williams, F. M. and Lockwood, J. (1930) “An economic study of food consumed by farm and village families in central New York.” New York Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. No. 502. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar