Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:54:29.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Long Road to Recovery: Postcrisis Coordination of Private Charity and Public Relief in Victorian Lancashire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Extract

When an unprecedented and unanticipated downturn strikes a community, resources from disparate sources combine to aid those harmed by the distress. Today as in the past, public and private sources coordinate relief efforts, and the persistence of distress beyond that which had been anticipated and provided for by insurance brings in resources from outside the community. However, it is possible to crowd out a resource when the efforts of one source decrease the efforts of another. Modern research documents public welfare crowding out private charity (see, for example, Abrams and Schmitz 1978), and this also occurred in the past. Exploring this kind of concern, the present article highlights aspects of income assistance that played a role during the Lancashire cotton famine (1861-65).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Burton, and Schmitz, Mark (1978) “The ‘crowding-out’ effects of governmental transfers on private charitable contributions.Public Choice 33: 2939.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. Arthur (1865) The History of the Cotton Famine. London: Sanders, Otley.Google Scholar
Ashton-Staleybridge Reporter (1862).Google Scholar
Bloom Street Relief Committee Minute Book (1862-63) Manchester Central Library Manuscript Archive Misc. 331.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Edwin (1864) Address to the Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 26 Sept. 1864, on the Effect of Manufacturing Distress on Manufacturing Progress, and on the Improvement of the Condition of the Wage Classes, in Agriculture as Well as in Manufactures. London: Robert Hardwick.Google Scholar
Economist (1862-65).Google Scholar
Edsall, Nicholas C. (1986) Richard Cobden, Independent Radical. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Famie, Douglas (1979) The English Cotton Industry and the World Market. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gramlich, Edward M. (1977) “Intergovernmental grants: A review of the empirical literature,” in Oates, Wallace (ed.) The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Henderson, William O. (1969 [1934]) The Lancashire Cotton Famine 1861-1865. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Huberman, Michael (1986) “Invisible handshakes in Lancashire: Cotton spinning in the first half of the nineteenth century.Journal of Economic History 46: 987-98.Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul (1985) Saving and Spending. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
J.|Farnall’s Reports to the Poor Law Board on the Distress in the Cotton Manufacturing Districts: 1862, Vol. 49, part I; 1863, vol. 22; 1864, vol. 25; 1864, vol. 52; 1865, vol. 22.Google Scholar
Kiesling, L. Lynne (1996) “Institutional choice matters: The poor law and implicit labor contracts in Victorian Lancashire.Explorations in Economic History 33: 6585.Google Scholar
Livesey, Joseph (1885) Autobiography. London: National Temperance League.Google Scholar
London Times (1862-63).Google Scholar
Maclure, J. W. (1862-65) Monthly Reports of the Central Executive Committee for the Fund for Relief of Distress in the Manufacturing Districts, December 1862-June 1865. Manchester Central Library Manuscript P2200, P3339.Google Scholar
Manchester and Salford District Provident Society Annual Reports (1861-66) Manchester Central Library Manuscript Archive M294/1/7/1.Google Scholar
Manchester and Salford District Provident Society Minute Book (1861-66) Manchester Central Library Manuscript Archive M294/1/1/6.Google Scholar
Manchester Examiner and Times (1861-64).Google Scholar
Morley, John (1893) The Life of Richard Cobden. London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. A. (1893) Darwen and the Cotton Famine. Darwen: J. J. Riley.Google Scholar
Oddy, Derek (1983) “Urban famine in nineteenth-century Britain: The effect of the Lancashire cotton famine on working-class diet and health.Economic History Review 36: 6886.Google Scholar
Oldham Standard (1861).Google Scholar
Purdy, Frederick (1864) “The cost of the cotton famine in relief to the poor.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 27: 596602.Google Scholar
Reports of the Factory Inspectors: 1860, vol. 34; 1861, vol. 22; 1862, vol. 22; 1863, vol. 18; 1864, vol. 22; 1865, vol. 20.Google Scholar
Rochdale Board of Guardians Annual Reports (1862, 1863) Rochdale Town Library, Greater Manchester.Google Scholar
Rochdale Observer (1861-62).Google Scholar
Rose, Michael E. (1977) “Rochdale man and the Stalybridge riot: The relief and control of the unemployed during the Lancashire cotton famine,” in Donajgrodzki, A. P. (ed.) Social Control in Nineteenth Century Britain. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Slagg, John Jr., (1870) The Cotton Trade of Lancashire and the Anglo-French Commercial Treaty of 1860, Being a Report of the English Evidence at the French Commercial Inquiry of 1870. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.Google Scholar
Torrens, William (1864) Lancashire’s Lesson; or, the Need of a Settled Policy in Times of Exceptional Distress. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Wallis, John J. (1991) “The political economy of New Deal fiscal federalism.Economic Inquiry 29: 510-24.Google Scholar
Walton, John K. (1987) Lancashire: A Social History 1558-1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, John (1968 [1866]) The Facts of the Cotton Famine. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Waugh, Edwin (1867) Home Life of the Lancashire Factory Folk during the Cotton Famine. London: Simpkin, Marshall.Google Scholar